Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Checklist 2

    Uploaded by

    api-298276026
    54 views1 page
    This document provides a checklist for evaluating radio programs with sections to provide feedback on the music, technical aspects, presenter, content, and room for suggested improvements. The aim is to give constructive feedback to help presenters improve. Key areas covered include how the music suits the audience, any technical or microphone issues, whether the presenter properly introduced themselves and maintained a good pace and voice levels, and if the content was clear on the station and program and at an appropriate length.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    checklist2

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document provides a checklist for evaluating radio programs with sections to provide feedback on the music, technical aspects, presenter, content, and room for suggested improvements. The aim is to give constructive feedback to help presenters improve. Key areas covered include how the music suits the audience, any technical or microphone issues, whether the presenter properly introduced themselves and maintained a good pace and voice levels, and if the content was clear on the station and program and at an appropriate length.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    54 views1 page

    Checklist 2

    Uploaded by

    api-298276026
    This document provides a checklist for evaluating radio programs with sections to provide feedback on the music, technical aspects, presenter, content, and room for suggested improvements. The aim is to give constructive feedback to help presenters improve. Key areas covered include how the music suits the audience, any technical or microphone issues, whether the presenter properly introduced themselves and maintained a good pace and voice levels, and if the content was clear on the station and program and at an appropriate length.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Program Evaluation Checklist

    For use during Part 3 of Radio Adelaide Basic Radio Skills Course
    This may be shown to the presenter, so REMEMBER the aim is CONSTRUCTIVE feedback.

    Program Name ............................ Date .............. Time ..


    What audience is it aimed at?.......................................................................................
    Presenters Name(s.YOUR name: ..

    MUSIC
    What did you like or not like about the music?
    How did it suit or not suit the shows audience?
    Did you hear enough information about the music?
    Were there any problems with music levels?
    Suggested improvements?

    TECHNICAL
    Were there any microphone problems?
    If so, what do you think was the cause?
    Was there any studio noise from papers etc?
    Were there any mistakes or silences?
    If so, were they handled well?
    Suggested improvements?

    PRESENTER
    Did they tell you who they are?
    Were the voice levels OK?
    Did you like their voice? Why? Or why not?
    Comment on the pace of the speaking:
    Could you tell if they were reading a script?
    Did it sound OK?
    Did they do a live subscriber call?
    Suggested improvements?

    CONTENT
    Could you tell which station and program you were listening to? How?
    What did you hear apart from the music?
    Were you told about it in advance?
    Was it interesting to you? Why?
    Did you hear anything which you think should NOT have been broadcast?
    Was the length of the content too long or too short?
    Suggested improvements?

    C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\uploads\sarah.tomlinson@adelaide.edu.au\20090304T183719\UPDATED 3 Program Evaluation ch'list 2008.doc

    You might also like