'_.

\ ......

'~

No.: 14536

2nd Floor, High Court Extension, Fort, Mumbai - 400 032. (() : 2267 33 71

RECEIPT

Date: 19-Mar·201Q

DC.FEESNC.

DC POSTAGE RECPT Ne

j Cash

700.00 150.00

, ,

.. CASH REeD FROM .. JAVED RAMZAN SHAIKH FOR DC FEES AND PQSTAGE

Rs, Eight HundredPitty Only

850.00

._.

PRESCRIBED FORM FOR COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 35 OF THE ADVOCATES ACT, 1961

DISCIPLINARY CASE NO. OF 2010

Javed Ramzan Shaikh

.. Complainant

Versus

Balkrishna G. Tangsali

.. Respondent

INDEX.

Sr. Particulars Page Nos.
No.
i - g
01. Disciplinary Case
02. EXHIBIT 'A' _:j
Copy of the letter dated 28.04.2009.
~.
03. EXHIBIT 'B'
Copy of the Affidavit submitted on
13.04.2009 on behalf of abovesaid Case No. 10 - IrZ
4740 of 2009.
04. EXHIBIT 'c'
Copy of the Affidavit notarized on 13 IS--
13.04.2009. ~
05. EXHIBIT'D' Ib
Copy of the Affidavit dated 13.04.2009. ~ 18
06. EXHIBIT 'E' 13
Copy of the order passed by the Hon'ble .- .!2...D
High Court dated 25.06.2009.
o!'f; c..ol'~ 0+ <;fe.a ... rftJ..- L L~Lr ol- ·Rlj P6>'n4el-1k;- .QJ - :2L
r LASTPAGE: 22..."
-'i.;;:j':m<rTM<l ~i.

I .; .

.fii~Jl J "At.:~f~r;:ft

r.n ;m~ ll::_r-;_,r.; r.. _

~

CV 884244

~~f)f;:rihm ~3r~~.~

,PRESCRIBED Fd~M"'FO:it"COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 35 OF THE ADVOCATES ACT, 1961

DISCIPLINARY CASE NO. OF 2010

1. Name, age, profession and address of the

Complainant (with telephone No. if any, of residence I office)

Javed Ramzan Shaikh Age 39 years

Cable Business & Social Work Hasan Papa House

Vithalwadi, Akurdi

Pune - 411 035.

Mobile # 9922501648

Phone: 020 - 27651313

B/3, Puskar Co-op. Housing Society, Opp. Vastu Anand Complex Parsiknagar, Kharigaon

Thane - 400 605

Mobile # 9833531220

Phone # 022-25392619

High Court: C/o AAWI, Room No. 18 Appellate Side, Bar Room

Fort, Mumbai - 400 032.

Tel # 022-22672880 / 22673153 Telefax # 022-22632498

2.

Full name and address of Balkrishna G. Tangsali

the Respondent ~ B.Com. LL.B.

Advocate with telephone number, if any.

3.

Date and year of alleged misconduct:

Whether the Respondent/ s

was engaged as an

Advocate of the

Complainant in any matter, if so give particulars, year, suit number or action number?

4.

5.

Whether the Complainant has approached any other

Forum

or

remedy

exercised?

6.

Whether

any

Court

proceedings are adopted or pending connected with the alleged misconduct?

7. Amount, if any, involved

8. Documents, if any, relied upon by the Complainant (annex copies)

13.04.2009

Yes, Writ Petition No. 4740 of 2009

No

Yes, Writ Petition No .. 4740 of 2009.

Cash Rs. 40,000/-

List of given document to Respondent

Advocate are mentioned below as :

1. Received order letter moved from

Chamber of Hon'ble President of

India, behalf on proper inquiry to

Ministry of Home Affairs, Government

of India. Hereto annexed and marked

as EXHIBIT 'A' is the copy of the said

letter dated 28.04.2009.

2. Documents of various Department

regarding matter of Case No. 4740 of

2009 of Brahma Residency & Vedas

Family Restaurant Penn it Room &

Beer Bar includes with document

collected under Right to Information

Act of 2005, from various concerned

Department. Hereto annexed and

marked as EXHIBIT 'B' is the copy of ,

the Affidavit submitted on 13.04.2009

on behalf of abovesaid Case No. 4740

of 2009.

3. Spiral widening file regarding IMP

Proofs collected under Right to

Information Act of 2005 of Savali

Hotel situated at Nigdi. This property

is of PCMC Municipal Corporation.

Therefore, the owner of said Hotel

Savali is Mr. Jagdish Shetty, PC.!C

Corporator and Smt. Prafulla han.ka:-

Shetty (widow and mother 0:

Corporator Ulhaas Shankar She _;-

and Corporator J agdish Shankar

Shetty).

According to

Act

Municipality it IS totally illegal.

Notarized Affidavit on 13.04.2009,

behalf on above mentioned proofs to

file proper case in High Court. Hereto

annexed and marked as EXHIBIT 'C'

is the copy of the Affidavit notarized

on 13.04.2009.

4. Total proofs

created

of bogus

documents by Shashikala Gade,

owner of Nilesh Beer Shoppe. This

Beer Shoppe Licensee is seized by

concerned

behalf of

authorities

granting

au thorization

under

regarding

of

Liquor

Act

misrepresentation, fake and fraud

documents.

Therefore, Competent

Authority of State Excise, Pune had

intensively not filed criminal case of

forgery because some pu blic servant

may implead for issuing authorization

on illegal and fake documents.

Notarized Affidavit behalf of filing case

for necessary action on abovesaid

forgery dated 13.04.2009.

Hereto

annexed and marked as EXHlBIT 'D'

is the copy of the Affidavit dated

13.04.2009.

4. The order copy dated 25th January

of

on

9.

Whether the Applicant has any witness in support of his allegations? If so, give their names and address.

10. Brief facts with regard to alleged misconduct:

2009 passed by this Hori'ble Court in Writ Petition No. 4740 of 2009,

Hereto annexed and marked as

EXHIBIT 'E' is the copy of the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court dated 25.06.2009.

Yes, Mr. Alankar Karlekar, Advocate

of Pune Sessions Court, was a

Mediator for consulting Respondent

Advocate. Therefore, My. Meenakant

Shinde,

gf

Dattawadi,

resident

Akurdi, Pune - 411 035 at time of

filing notarized Affidavit at High Court

in front of Notary Mr. Vishwajit N,

Sagare,

of

India,

Government

Advocate

,

of

High

Court

on

13.04.2009. My. Nana Saheb Pisaal,

resident of Dattawadi, behind Nan a

Smruti Mangal Karylaya, Akurdi,

Pune - 411 035 at the time of filing

notarized Affidavit at High Court in

front of concerned Notary of High

Court. Smt. Reshma Munir Shaikh,

resident of

Sonigara Heights, Flat

No, 101, near Keshaw Managal

Karyalaya, Tr iverii Nagar, Talawde,

Nigdi.

Respondent

Advocate

had

not

annexed notarized Affidavit, which

was prepared on 13.04.2009 in order

annex with the Writ Petition No. 4740

of 2009 before Hon'ble High Court.

Therefore, the Hon'ble High Court

observed that the Petitioner had not

produced any sufficient material for

their perusal. Therefore, the Honble

Court dismissed the Petition for want

of

merit.

The

Complainant

respectfully further states that the

Complainant has glven

other

information regarding material m

above said Case No. 4740 of 2009

belong to graphed public use land

under local Government policy, which

had

collected

under

Right

to

Information Act, 2005 from various

proper

care

of the

abovesaid

concerned Department to produce

before the Hon'ble High Court. But

Respondent Advocate not taking

submitted same fake and fraud

documents. Complainant respectfully

further states that the Respondent

Advocate had even not submitted

order copy issued for necessary action

on abovesaid matter including two

other matters from the Chamber of

first citizen i.e. Hon'ble President of

India dated 28/04/2009 behalf on

:~~

~

..

~

j~) <I

--"

documents.

Complainant further

states that the Respondent Advocate

had intensively not submitted IMP

Contempt to Court of Pune Sessions

Court and fake created documents of

City Survey Office of PCMC City,

regarding to Case No. 4740 collected

under concerned Court procedure and

under Right to Information Act of

2005.

Therefore, Complainant had

submitted notarized Affidavit filed in

front of abovesaid Notary Advocate of

High Court, in cause of dangerous to

his life, behalf of above said three

matters

13.04.2009.

on

Respondent Advocate had proceeded

only one matter, that also not

producing Petitioner's Affidavit, on

very late after three months on

19.06.2009

with

proceeding

incomplete material and missing

essential fact of Case No. 4740 of

2009, which is required to produce

before the Hon'ble High Court to get

justice.

But unfortunately willfully

and intensively abovesaid documents

not produced by the Respondent

Advocate. Therefore, he is liable to

punish under Section 35 of the

But

Advocates Act, 1961.

11. Explanation for delay in filing Complaint, if any.

There is no delay m filing the Complaint.

12. Any

other

relevant

Yes. Complainant respectfully states,

information with regard to the alleged misconduct.

of two more Affidavit regarding forgery

by' owner of Mis. Nilesh Beer Shappe

and violated terms and conditions of

Municipality

Maharashtra

under

Government regarding property of

PCMC Municipal Corporation of

Savali Hotel, under Constitution of

India.

Solemnly affirmed at Mumbai

.sc:

This /{day of March 2010.

_@_

Before me,

Identified by. me, Pttzr+>j _~:t1 r ~"Y)'

~

. {_ ~vt.d fZ. a,t1..7~

SEFORE Me

rs)~/V~~~

•• 8. CH!TK/U~ . .'J, M A.LL.fl. .-.C;:.H./OCP, Hi: Er ['40T ARV {QO"iT. O~ iNDIA}

2, A '{ un IH~Fi"CES

UlA, CW;r.E PARuDE. COL~

~UK~r~Ti0

Serial Number: Pi-B /5969

PRESIDENT'S SECRETARIAT (PUBLIC SECTION) RASHTRAPATIBHAVAN NEW DELHI - 11 0004

Dated: 28-Apr-2009

Enclosed please find for appropriate attention a petition dated 15/04/'.2009

received from SHRI JAVED SEKH, HASSAN PAPA CHAWL, DUTTBARI AKUD1. PUNE. Maharashtra

Action taken in the matter-may please be communicated to the petitioner directly under

intimation to this Secretariat. . ,

-,

-,

To,

[KC. Jayarajan) Add1. Comptroller

SECRETARY TO THE. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY ..oF-HOME AFFAIRS

NORTH BLOCK

NEW IHLm

JAVED SEKH

HASE:AN PAPA CHAWL, DUITBARI AKUDI

PUNE:

Maharashtra

Requested to liaise with the aforementioned addressee directly for further information 10 the m atter

" .. ~~: ..... ~:~' .. --'\

~-,-. __ .-l.~J. .... tV .

{K.C. Jayara::Janr--~' Adrii. Comptroller

Serial Npmber :

PI-B /5969

BOOK POST

. ON INDIA GOVERNMENT SERVICE

TO ..

SHRl JAVED SEKH

HASSAN PAPA CHAWL, DUTTBARI AKUDI

PONE

Mahllrashtra

FROM:

President's Secretariat Uuht,rapati Bhavan

Ii NEW:DELm· 110004.

\D

necessar'y

directior,

1'r'Jm th i 5

HOf")'ble

to

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBH:

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDJ ~TION

WRIT PETITION NO.

Javed Ramjuf") Shaikh Ver15US

01 Maharashtra L Ors.

.) •• Respondents

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF WRIT PETITION

Javed Ramjan Shaikh

inDIan

inhabit vn t ,

ay p.d 37

years,

re-;;idinC)

at Hu s a n Papa Cha,l.il,

Datta

f-\kurdi,

state as under :-

1. SaY ~hat I am filing present p~tition ~eekin9

i n i b a a t e proper e n qu i r-v trom the competent a u t ri o r Lrv

in·th~ mattmr of Brahmas Regency ~ Vedas Parmit Room

r\! • ..'rl!'.!-·-:::'~I z s, MI-~·i_\'!l.·iv~~ lJlhas Slletty, ur i te of

:uld

con d i t i on c (1.1' 1~1.lrH.inlj o-f said hotl:!1

n I'~!:::'C r .. j b. d

in

l·lat1.~r'2.;;t, l" ,'a F.ey i ana 1

TOl..Jfl

F'lannin9 (~c:t~

I h a v e p o t ri te d O'.lt tel the various a u t o o r-i ti e s

.af i;hf~ Co:,p_,r'atioll but n ob oo v c on s i o e r-o o ti1e sarne L{\

per s p e c t i v e ,

fl:rthe:' ';.0.,:/ that

the

,s a i rj

is

l.,~ i th i:) th eo r' ad '\ (,II L~ D f /~5 met e r s \.II'1!! I~ ~

11,(,

of n~ticle-2:L of

Conl'ititut'-m

of

\ \

2

situatad

In

thp

p s r-m i a er or :

h a v e

bee n g!' an t e cj to

said

I have ra~5ed said p~ints b~fure

State L<cis~

ALj1:hol~i ties

h a v I!

oy·'r'lOClk~d

the

same.

have no othur alternate ~ut ·to approach this

Hrrn • h 1 "

Court

beirg .ocal Cor~cr~~Dr

and

gener~1

;.1 lib J i r;

th~

demanding

any

ac t ion

~. inst lhp said hotel.

:.'.; . say t hat t h to: .:1 ~Jn t- r- Cl f the s aid hot eli 5 LJ 5 i n 9

permiss.i.on

"1",..":,, f'lunie: i p a l Cf..JrpnrEl t ion.

,) z: r 1 (Jl.ll,:'j

competent

,;Iri 11!,j ti:~\; ',:,,\"f" ct'it= 3tat'C! t:ut: ',,0 v a i ri h~nt'.:e-

ha.ve no

\J n d e r

(~nqu.l ;'p

i "I 1.1 \ ~ 1:_ '; I ~ (.I

c.:i

h o t,' 1

~.'. '0;' .. '.

!' . .'<, ••

~. say that cert~in anti ~o~i~l rlements who are

in

S;.fJC 1 a 1

a c t i v i Li e s

m~y

far

a c t i tlf)

BJ"alimas H~~...'t;;tf!'nc'.l &: V~diJ5 Po-rmi t Ro oru ,~ 8al~r

5Uy

thilt

i;he

said

clements

may

,1 I s [)

me

p o t i t i c e Ll v

r o r-

the

purpose

or

t his pet i t i on f ilL d 0 n 1" Lv i t h i..

soc i 2. ~

',' i P\ .. , J

am jU3t brin~ing this fact to the notice at

this HOfl'ble Court.

3

am ~J('ll c o n va r-e s ri t. with the facts

was p!rsonally knowing t~e same and

. .:.' ... i; ......

arn aff i r'mi:09

this affiMnvit in supporr of my

petition.

:t. I J·i!p .. at, ,·<!iter<.te and confirm "he ~.\I~rments,

~·.~(';nte!'-~ti()n~,;, st"a.J:F:(j .in th~ oetition as if the same

'·'i."I'l': '~jpf"CJ fil.:;;:a!,l'/ St~l (lU::': h.(~f'(·.j,i'i and if t l i e 53-me be

.. inr.1 L(_fi"'rP.'C t.

XEROX iRUE copy Vt.SHw~;r N. SA~~.~~ .

N ,1j~\-{\6(1 tGov . ~~i~h~b !J

p.~,ffI3 APR 200q

t113 APR 2009

8 e f C' J' e IT> ~ I

..... i 1r\~", '

-:L" h."""'-- s« u,"" A'~"4_ tE-. -::. li.g·t'-<....DI

l. a """";; .... ~ b"""""_ .. I

tl'-~. \~ ~ ... '-rry~ (\...Jy.__~.\"'~~

fI'-tL.~~~~ ~ ~.\ ~ "\ -\~'O l! '1.... ~;l\._\I.f •. "\ \~\\M,·IA"' .<!,\, ...... ...',\:.\.,. 'M-L~\I'

, C.L

i.'J.~: tv'.JN"'-.t.t.M.1~ .. \. tt..u.V. \...G "'. I

BEFORE ~_.

. E~+----\S\V\ \ ()~

VISH'W.6J T N. tB~~~.

N TA r;_

Or. fvlumt?ai ! .... 1fJharas1rn~

Covt.of I nrjia

NOT1::0 a ReGISTERED 1 3 APR ZUD9 Sr. No 10.5" Page No.? tl

.rate 11 r V) - ~

t3

~. ~.,

H!GH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMSt1\Y ~i~"/'

cr~IL APPELLAT~ JURISDICTION \,

. \((?:7'

WRIT PETITION ~IO_

IN THE

OF 2009

) •. Petiti~ne,..

Rl'ffi.i an Shai kh Vere;l.ls

of Msharash~ra & OrH,

) .. t1espondents

AFFID~VIT IN SUPPORT OF WqIl PE1ITIGN

I, Ja,';od Ramjan Shaikh .nd

n 'nhabitant, aged 37

r a a Ld ing

u t H '] S:If: Pap a C h a ~il ,

Dat fa

A":Uf'd i I

.~

J, I uay that I am fili~g present ~~tition s~e~ing

ne~e5.ary dif'8ction

from

this

HrJf1 . b 1 e

Court

to

a n t t i a c e p r-op e r e n qu t r-v '~I'om the competent authori':\'

in

matter of Savli Hot~l,

by

th I~

Shankar Shetty, situated ~t Snetar 24. S~nt TU~3ram

I.'yapar Sank:oal, Niydi, PLlne-4~.1 l~44, .~s Shri. Jat.,dish

!,hankar

She tty

in it: i ill

·i.alated

hElS

.c e r ... t.a i n

recl'..L i I'ed

'far'

tender

from

Chi')(:h",ad Municipal CCJrpo,'atian for hu'·drl9

;o_;airl

land. or whieh hotel Savli 5itu~ted

on

1 o a s ~

hS!5ilSLi

I s av t h a t initial a m a r i r b i u e a l s o not

to ~~f'li.d 1''1-':)\;(.'1 and .:h~ ~;:'lme- is. detrimental

th e

I further S3Y that said Jagdish

Shetty

Lln~"luttlor"i5~:..Il),J tH~inl_)

f 10QI'

b a5emef~ t t :. ........ d

and

t e r-ra ce

of

th~ bu\ld,ng as he w~s h~Ylng 19as~

ot

only ~round floor and first floor.

SFty

said

hutel h~s

tl'le

structur'e

o f th"

building

without obtaining any permission

, i th e r from

M'JI'I ic ipa 1

Corporation or fro~ Nav Nagar Pradhikaran

Vikas Committee.

4. GJIY that bei·ng Co r-p c r a t o r' ~.: li.Jar'd No.52 \.Ijhl;::·~

tlof!

said

h o t e 1

is unauthorisedlv run

by

Jagdl;;h

requested various comp!tent authorities of

b

in

vain

henc~

h a v e

riD

o t L, e r

alternate

but

under

th e

provisions

of AI'ticllt-226. at Constitution o f

India

.auking necessary 'directiGn~ from thi5 Hon"blq CGurt

~\. say that ""rtain anti aocial element" ",ho are

c r-s a b i v e

social

activities

may

p f"'8S5Ur'i s e

m"

, Dr

not t al~ in9 n o v

a c t ion

a q a i r. s t

furthur say that tho said

eo 1 f!'lne r1 t S

III a ~.'

also pres5Llris" me p'~litical.ly for the

purpose

til i s

pf!tition filed

only

I~ i th

a

y .1 el~J I

~m just bringing this ,act

to

t h e

nQtice of this Han'bie Court.

~m woli conv~r~ant with th&

7 a c ts

,.'3.5 p e r-s o o aLl v knol~in') the s a m e 31\d

.-3;.:1

th'B affidavit in

support

OT

rriv

!'i ,.' ; I, I ~ '). 1 _

ave r·n..:?n t'.:_""

\,: I.i~: '.: ~~.J It; ion ':-"l

ill UIC' CEi'; 1 t lDIl as if the

I.' ,':, r- ti'

specifically ~et ou~ ~erein and if th~ same be

r_; .

stat~d hereinabove is I say that what&v~r

a e to be and I b~l!ve the s m

to my own knowl~dge

8,

true

t "U ~

and c o rr-e c t

, 'f i' i r'lI1ed at Murnb i! i

"'0-- Eiolemnly a ,

~-;;-:.::.~~ 01.~ of Apr'i 1- 2i?iI!i9)

r~~;.~ .. 'i ated this ~.1 dAy

I ''''':4~"''

\ ,,' '.'

" .-. /_t>;' ~~~)~ ~ li;?-"

'~~::::.7'.,.-

Bei'o"c me,

.J:. ~ ~ -hN-l7rirn\" ••. ,A

u:..:._ .... VN (('JI'll~\ .••

"J.- .- c.., '"'"6 If """'-Y\ . 6 ~~~/

~f~ LW~~J. ~ .. ~ ~~ ~ ~4_o{~ p..a_\N..~VI J: ~ \rfv... I ~

~-, j\o.-l~"-J-"'1-"c" {k;..~\a.L ,

VISHWAJ

N Gr. MUG'g

r1' 3 APR 2009

NOTED & REGISTERED s. to-'o to} Page No,~~ \"-Vl-tJ9.

Date_ -- _

XEROX TRUE COpy V,S HWA.JI N. SAGARE B .LL.B.

Ib

IN THE

I.JRIT PETITllJN NO.

OF 2009

Javed ~Bmjan Shaikh

) .. Peti t i o n e r-

Ver~u£

at MBharashtra ~ 01'5.

) .. Responr!ent,-.

C?ttil

~I~.d i .

PL.lil'f?-lJll l?t:~5, (\n i':~rvb~/ s o l c rnn Lv a r f i r-.» and

:,t.21I";e .'\s und,._',·

I ~,"',' th~.1; I arn filing p r-c-s e n t petition c:eel'il1:;1

oe c o s s a r-v

direction

from this Hon'bl~

to

Court

eil,lti;;lI;e p r-c-p e i- .enquil'", f~om the c omo e t e n t authority

.s f t e r- carvc e Ll a c i ort of li.cf!·n:=;", no.FL/8R-2 in the name

D'f Nilesh Bt~ef' Shoppy, ~;\..tr\ley NO ... 3t?H) , Ne2.f"' Vtandai\

(Ia ku I'd i. ,

Pur·f! ,

t h our.h there

a c t i on

as

f-' I"C~FjC I" i 1.1 ed

has

in

not

" f .flcted.

r fiBY t rs a t b o i n q loco.l [._11'1' -a t o r- of \lIard NI .. S2

of Pimp l' i

Ch i o c lvur a.d >~l...l1icipal Corporation, as

per'son ...

affect~d from the area where the said

[:e e:-

E,hop

ai tuated h av e

c ompLa Lri e d "itn Pi'1prl

ell il1c'h~Jad

Municipal

CQr'~c r'~ t i on

the

CUl'poratrJl' of the' s a i d u r e a til? said people o e rn a n o c cr

f." (' r t OI,i n

by me.

H['nce, in the capacity 0"

Co r-p o r- a. t o r-

anj beinq tbe mass leadnr of 0ublic rD~idin9 there,

am fiJ.ing ~llls petition i;<o.kin9 ~'"Ito consideration

\.

'_'

s

aOI

1\ f f i I' i'l i r"~

this nffidLvit in

sup,:Jort

my

ere H t .: '.' e

in keepinq hUI~d,e In m,' social

activities

Ijlay

p r- e ~~ j.u r' i ~:; e m ~ fa (' I) (.:1

tak'ing .;:ny act on 8.93 i ri s "

ftlrther sa:/

t" e

sa i d

I:.' 1 (~lne n t 5

pre 5 S Lt f"' i ~") ~

me

for

the

purpos~

at

'" i thtJ J' ""J i n,~

this petitIon filed onl;, with a

soclal

vi. (:IVlJ.

\,1 i' 1 I n D t vI; t h d r i\ OJ t his pet i t i o f'\

unless

this Hon'ble Court directs me regarding

sa/ that e~~n while iHsuing li~ense for

.,.:;.

·'10·'

.:.'

Nilesh Beer ShDper there ~re v~riDus fDrm~litiys

c e r-t a in Ic c urt a a in isslnng said t t c an s s .

have-

taken most of the information regarding the S3me by

"I,i../ of seekin'd t n t o r-ma c ton uriu e r- "Right to

Inro{"r,)ation Act".

say tha'~ 1 am ~,.l ~ 1 c on v e r-s arv r "Ii th the

facts

of the case as I waw personally knowing the same and

pet i: e t.on .

I" •

!'epeat, !'aiterate and confirm t n e

a;\,lermvntO:::l

"t:LJntllntions

in the petitlon as if the

5 an. E"

specifically 5Ut out her~in ~~d if the same be

1n~mad part of thia affidavit.

·.

!)Jh",- t ':tv Elf'

j 1 8 r t: i Ii a b a v e i s

t ru ~

to ~v own ~nowledge

+;rue

\ c\ 1'1\ ~~ ~ {l~ hJ ~.I!.

"'""00",,, ~'u~~~l~~q

)<~ .

• • ~i 3 APR 2009

Petitioner

Sefore m a ,

: .. :

HOTEr.) & REGISTERED 81. No~~ "10,30 D<:lle_jJ,..:.__l:c_0.:1

IN TI-IE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT B01VrBAY

Javed Ramjan Shaikh.

Versus

Superintendent of State Excise, Pune & Ors.

Petitioner.

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO. 4740 OF 2009

Resporiderus.

Mr. 13. G. Tangsali for the: Petitioner. Mr. V. A. Sonpal, AGP for the State.

CORAM:

BILAL NAZKI and MRS.V.KTAHILRAMANI, JJ.

DATED:

25TH JUNE, 2009.

Admittedly, respondent NO.5 is running a lodge after obtaining the

licence from the concerned authority. The petitioner wants thar this Court

should hold an inquiry and.direcr.respondent.No.Lto c8.Il.C£'_Lc]Jf', Li.cf..o.{:;e_Qf ...

respondent NO.5. We do not find there is sufficient material for us [0

proceed in the matter and hold an inquiry. The petitioner has other

himself.

!2_o

2

2. 00" this reason, we do not find (1 ny merit in the writ petition, which

is hereby dismissed.

. ~..

. ~''''

. '

r.

.d_ )

.....

I vIsa;wAJIT N. SAGARE I B.A. LL. B I I I I I I I I I I . 1 1 J 1

I I I I

I

;.DVQCATE, HIGH COURT

219/8571. Kannamwar Nagar, No.1, Vikhroli (East),

Mumbai - 400 083.

Mob.: 9819017640 ) 3.- L1""~

[NOTARY FEE RECEIPT)

Received Rs. 1 ~ t ~ .

In words {) v.L ~ £\~ ~

byCash/C~ ~ .

From:::S dr\~. - ~2>\M?.!1I\.. s.\NA \¢.!A •

on Account of Notaries work .f\H\~\ \lcv\ h 'uJJy)QtI af Affi'dw\ 1-

\v,_S~ rt-W'jl'''' ~ :h'~ w. .-\v.L~

VISRWAJ .

X . B ' r"

AOVOCA ,HIGH OURT

Cllen _ 9 ature Regd. No. 7618

No.3

Date:~

!~ ~ ..... :""; ~ ~ ;::-\- ~1 c:"\?

",_,I ..._ '.._ ........ ~ r ..._ ... '.... f - l) I

1< .. >:~ ::0 '~-'Y) • '7 ~ .,l'(\..) J (lJ;,," ~"'7~

.J oN (~~ J ~'h\ \<. h. ,

.........

O?HONE ;2267 'LOloU, TELt::FAX:22e~ ~"GBJ

o PHONE :25392619

'----------------------------------------

B. G. TANGSALI ac.-.u_£ ADVOCATE HIGH COURT

:i :

OFF. 1 A.AW.l., ROOM NO.1 S, HIGH COURT, f'QRT, MUM~I ~ 400 032. RES!. : 813, PUSHKAR CHS., OEp. VASYU A1\ANOCOMP(E\ PARSIKNAGAR, KHARIGAON - KALWA.. iHANE - ~OO 505.

t)'tJ

)

.-snv \. ~'H JR. Sht./I.c\

\\) ~ \..: tJ.cyo,'l') ?,~ pC>. U .... ,Y"J \) D~Y~\N~t~ ~

1't\(V\YCt\; ~ '~"t\~

~\\O~j-

-p-~ JJ )~O'Y) Lo\l\J~)