Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Centimetre Gram Second System
Centimetre Gram Second System
1 of 12
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centimetre_gram_second_system_of_units
The centimetre-gram-second system (abbreviated CGS or cgs) is a metric system of physical units based on
centimetre as the unit of length, gram as a unit of mass, and second as a unit of time. All CGS mechanical units
are unambiguously derived from these three base units, but there are several different ways of extending the
CGS system to cover electromagnetism.
The CGS system has been largely supplanted by the MKS system, based on metre, kilogram, and second. MKS
was in turn extended and replaced by the International System of Units (SI). The latter adopts the three base
units of MKS, plus the ampere, mole, candela and kelvin. In many fields of science and engineering, SI is the
only system of units in use. However, there remain certain subfields where CGS is prevalent.
In measurements of purely mechanical systems (involving units of length, mass, force, energy, pressure, etc.),
the differences between CGS and SI are straightforward and rather trivial; the unit-conversion factors are all
powers of 10 arising from the relations 100 cm = 1 m and 1000 g = 1 kg. For example, the CGS derived unit of
force is the dyne, equal to 1 gcm/s2, while the SI derived unit of force is the newton, 1 kgm/s2. Thus it is
straightforward to show that 1 dyne=105 newton.
On the other hand, in measurements of electromagnetic phenomena (involving units of charge, electric and
magnetic fields, voltage, etc.), converting between CGS and SI is much more subtle and involved. In fact,
formulas for physical laws of electromagnetism (such as Maxwell's equations) need to be adjusted depending on
what system of units one uses. This is because there is no one-to-one correspondence between electromagnetic
units in SI and those in CGS, as there are for mechanical units. Furthermore, within CGS, there are several
plausible choices of electromagnetic units, leading to different unit "sub-systems", including Gaussian, "ESU",
"EMU", and Heaviside-Lorentz. Among these choices, Gaussian units are the most common today, and in fact
the phrase "CGS units" is often used to refer specifically to CGS-Gaussian units.
Contents
1 History
2 Definition of CGS units in mechanics
2.1 Definitions and conversion factors of CGS units in mechanics
3 Derivation of CGS units in electromagnetism
3.1 CGS approach to electromagnetic units
3.2 Alternate derivations of CGS units in electromagnetism
3.3 Various extensions of the CGS system to electromagnetism
3.4 Electrostatic units (ESU)
3.4.1 ESU notation
3.5 Electromagnetic units (EMU)
3.5.1 EMU notation
3.6 Relations between ESU and EMU units
3.7 Other variants
8/6/2010 3:01 PM
2 of 12
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centimetre_gram_second_system_of_units
History
The CGS system goes back to a proposal made in 1832 by the German mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss.[1]
In 1874, it was extended by the British physicists James Clerk Maxwell and William Thomson with a set of
electromagnetic units.
The values (by order of magnitude) of many CGS units turned out to be inconvenient for practical purposes. For
example, many everyday length measurements yield hundreds or thousands of centimetres, such as those of
human height and sizes of rooms and buildings. Thus the CGS system never gained wide general use outside the
field of electrodynamics and laboratory science. Starting in the 1880s, and more significantly by the mid-20th
century, CGS was gradually superseded internationally by the MKS (metre-kilogram-second) system, which in
turn became the modern SI standard.
From the international adoption of the MKS standard in the 1940s and the SI standard in the 1960s, the
technical use of CGS units has gradually declined worldwide, in the United States more slowly than elsewhere.
CGS units are today no longer accepted by the house styles of most scientific journals, textbook publishers, or
standards bodies, although they are commonly used in astronomical journals such as the Astrophysical Journal.
CGS units are still occasionally encountered in technical literature, especially in the United States in the fields of
material science, electrodynamics and astronomy.
The units gram and centimetre remain useful as prefixed units within the SI system, especially for instructional
physics and chemistry experiments, where they match the small scale of table-top setups. However, where
derived units are needed, the SI ones are generally used and taught instead of the CGS ones today. For example,
a physics lab course might ask students to record lengths in centimeters, and masses in grams, but force (a
derived unit) in newtons, a usage consistent with the SI system.
8/6/2010 3:01 PM
3 of 12
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centimetre_gram_second_system_of_units
CGS unit
CGS unit
abbreviation
Symbol
length, position
L, x
mass
gram
time
second
1 second
=1s
velocity
cm/s
cm/s
= 102 m/s
force
dyne
dyn
g cm / s2
= 105 N
energy
erg
erg
g cm2 / s2
= 107 J
power
erg/s
g cm2 / s3
= 107 W
pressure
barye
Ba
g / (cm s2)
= 101 Pa
dynamic viscosity
poise
g / (cm s)
= 101 Pas
wavenumber
kayser
cm1
cm1
= 100 m1
centimetre
cm
Definition
Equivalent
in SI units
Quantity
1/100 of metre
= 102 m
8/6/2010 3:01 PM
4 of 12
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centimetre_gram_second_system_of_units
much so that formulas for physical laws of electromagnetism are adjusted depending on what system of units
one uses. This illustrates the fundamental difference in the ways the two systems are built:
In SI, the unit of electric current is chosen[2] to be 1 ampere (A). It is a base unit of the SI system, along
with meter, kilogram, and second. The ampere is not dimensionally equivalent to any combination of
other base units, so electromagnetic laws written in SI require an additional constant of proportionality
(see Vacuum permittivity) to bridge electromagnetic units to kinematic units. All other electric and
magnetic units are derived from these four base units using the most basic common definitions: for
example, electric charge q is defined as current I multiplied by time t,
,
therefore unit of electric charge, coulomb (C), is defined as 1 C = 1 As.
CGS system avoids introducing new base units and instead derives all electric and magnetic units from
centimeter, gram, and second based on the physics laws that relate electromagnetic phenomena to
mechanics.
charges q and , separated by distance d. Here kC is a constant which depends on how exactly the unit
of charge is derived from the CGS base units.
The second is Ampre's force law,
length L between currents I and I' flowing in two long parallel wires, separated by distance d. Since
I = q / t and
, the constant kA also depends on how the unit of charge is derived from the
Indeed, both of these mutually-exclusive approaches have been practiced by the users of CGS system, leading
to the two independent and mutually-exclusive branches of CGS, described in the subsections below. However,
the freedom of choice in deriving electromagnetic units from the units of length, mass, and time is not limited to
the definition of charge. While the electric field can be related to the work performed by it on a moving electric
charge, the magnetic force is always perpendicular to the velocity of the moving charge, and thus the work
performed by the magnetic field on any charge is always zero. This leads to a choice between two laws of
8/6/2010 3:01 PM
5 of 12
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centimetre_gram_second_system_of_units
magnetism, each relating magnetic field to mechanical quantities and electric charge:
The first law describes the Lorentz force produced by a magnetic field B on a charge q moving with
velocity v:
The second describes the creation of a static magnetic field B by an electric current I of finite length dl at
a point displaced by a vector r, known as Biot-Savart law:
where r and
are the length and the unit vector in the direction of vector r.
These two laws can be used to derive Ampre's force law, resulting in the relationship:
Therefore, if the unit of charge is based on the Ampre's force law such that kA = 1, it is natural to derive the
unit of magnetic field by setting
. However, if it is not the case, a choice has to be made as to
which of the two laws above is a more convenient basis for deriving the unit of magnetic field.
Furthermore, if we wish to describe the electric displacement field D and the magnetic field H in a medium
other than a vacuum, we need to also define the constants 0 and 0, which are the vacuum permittivity and
and
, where
permeability, respectively. Then we have[3] (generally)
P and M are polarization density and magnetization vectors. The factors and are rationalization constants,
which are usually chosen to be 4kC0, a dimensionless quantity. If = = 1, the system is said to be
"rationalized":[4] the laws for systems of spherical geometry contain factors of 4 (e.g. point charges), those of
cylindrical geometry factors of 2 (e.g. wires), and those of planar geometry contain no factors of (e.g.
parallel-plate capacitors). However, the original CGS system used = = 4, or, equivalently, kC0 = 1.
Therefore, Gaussian, ESU, and EMU subsystems of CGS (described below) are not rationalized.
kC
Electrostatic[3]
CGS
(ESU, esu, or
stat-)
c2
c2
c2
Electromagnetic[3]
CGS
(EMU, emu, or
ab-)
c2
c2
Gaussian[3] CGS
c1
c2
c1
c1
system
HeavisideLorentz[3] CGS
'
8/6/2010 3:01 PM
6 of 12
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centimetre_gram_second_system_of_units
SI
kC = k1 = kE
kA = k2 = kE / c2
L = k3 = kF
In system-independent form, Maxwell's equations in vacuum can be written as:[3][5]
1
Note that of all these variants, only in Gaussian and Heaviside-Lorentz systems L equals c
rather than 1.
As a result, vectors and
of an electromagnetic wave propagating in vacuum have the same units and are
equal in magnitude in these two variants of CGS.
8/6/2010 3:01 PM
7 of 12
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centimetre_gram_second_system_of_units
8/6/2010 3:01 PM
8 of 12
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centimetre_gram_second_system_of_units
The ESU and EMU subsystems of CGS are connected by the fundamental relationship kC
/ kA = c2 (see
above), where c = 29,979,245,800 31010 is the speed of light in vacuum in cm/s. Therefore, the ratio of the
corresponding primary electrical and magnetic units (e.g. current, charge, voltage, etc. quantities
proportional to those that enter directly into Coulomb's law or Ampre's force law) is equal either to c-1 or c:[6]
and
.
Units derived from these may have ratios equal to higher powers of c, for example:
.
Other variants
There were at various points in time about half a dozen systems of electromagnetic units in use, most based on
the CGS system.[7] These also include Gaussian units, and Heaviside-Lorentz units.
Further complicating matters is the fact that some physicists and engineers in the United States use hybrid units,
such as volts per centimetre for electric field. In fact, this is essentially the same as the SI unit system, by the
variant to translate all lengths used into cm, e.g. 1 m = 100 cm.
8/6/2010 3:01 PM
9 of 12
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centimetre_gram_second_system_of_units
1C
= (10-1 c) statC
= (10-1) abC
= (10-1 c) Fr
electric current
1A
= (10-1 c) statA
= (10-1) abA
= (10-1 c) Frs-1
electric potential
voltage
1V
= (108) abV
electric field
magnetic induction
1T
1 Am = (103 c) statAcm
magnetic flux
resistance
= (104) G
= (4 10-3) Oe
1 Wb
= (108) Mw
= (108) Gcm
= (109) ab
resistivity
1 m = (1011 c-2) s
capacitance
1F
= (10-9 c2) cm
= (10-9) abF
= (10-9 c2) cm
inductance
1H
= (109) abH
8/6/2010 3:01 PM
10 of 12
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centimetre_gram_second_system_of_units
In this table, c = 29,979,245,800 31010 is the speed of light in vacuum in the CGS units of cm/s.
One can think of the SI value of the Coulomb constant kC as:
This explains why SI to ESU conversions involving factors of c2 lead to significant simplifications of the ESU
units, such as 1 statF = 1 cm and 1 stat = 1 s/cm: this is the consequence of the fact that in ESU system kC=1.
For example, a centimetre of capacitance is the capacitance between a sphere of radius 1 cm in vacuum and
infinity. The capacitance C between two concentric spheres of radii R and r in ESU CGS system is:
.
By taking the limit as R goes to infinity we see C equals r.
Bohr magneton
Bohr radius
a0
Boltzmann constant
Electron mass
me
Elementary charge
Planck constant
Speed of light in vacuum
8/6/2010 3:01 PM
11 of 12
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centimetre_gram_second_system_of_units
While the absence of explicit prefactors in some CGS subsystems simplifies some theoretical calculations, it has
the disadvantage that sometimes the units in CGS are hard to define through experiment. Also, lack of unique
unit names leads to a great confusion: thus 15 emu may mean either 15 abvolt, or 15 emu units of electric
dipole moment, or 15 emu units of magnetic susceptibility, sometimes (but not always) per gram or per mole. On
the other hand, SI starts with a unit of current, the ampere, which is easier to determine through experiment, but
which requires extra prefactors in the electromagnetic equations. With its system of unique named units, SI also
removes any confusion in usage: 1 ampere is a fixed quantity of a specific variable, and so are 1 henry and 1
ohm.
A key virtue of the Gaussian CGS system is that electric and magnetic fields have the same units, 40 is
replaced by 1, and the only dimensional constant appearing in the equations is c, the speed of light. The
Heaviside-Lorentz system has these desirable properties as well (with 0 equaling 1), but it is a "rationalized"
system (as is SI) in which the charges and fields are defined in such a way that there are many fewer factors of
4 appearing in the formulas, and it is in Heaviside-Lorentz units that the Maxwell equations take their simplest
form.
In SI, and other rationalized systems (e.g. Heaviside-Lorentz), the unit of current was chosen such that
electromagnetic equations concerning charged spheres contain 4, those concerning coils of current and straight
wires contain 2 and those dealing with charged surfaces lack entirely, which was the most convenient choice
for electrical-engineering applications. In those fields where formulas concerning spheres dominate (for
example, astronomy), it has been argued that the non-rationalized CGS system can be somewhat more
convenient notationally.
In fact, in certain fields, specialized unit systems are used to simplify formulas even further than either SI or
CGS, by using some system of natural units. For example, the particle physics community uses a system where
every quantity is expressed by only one unit, the eV, with lengths, times, etc. all converted into eV's by inserting
factors of c and . This unit system is very convenient for particle-physics calculations, but would be
impractical in other contexts.
See also
Scientific units named after people
SI electromagnetism units
SI units
Units of measurement
8/6/2010 3:01 PM
12 of 12
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centimetre_gram_second_system_of_units
4. ^ Cardarelli, F. (2004). Encyclopaedia of Scientific Units, Weights and Measures: Their SI Equivalences
and Origins (http://books.google.com/?id=6KCx8Ww75VkC) (2nd ed.). Springer. p. 20.
ISBN 1-8523-3682-X. http://books.google.com/?id=6KCx8Ww75VkC.
5. ^ a b Leung, P. T. (2004). "A note on the 'system-free' expressions of Maxwell's equations". European
Journal of Physics 25 (2): N1N4. doi:10.1088/0143-0807/25/2/N01 (http://dx.doi.org
/10.1088%2F0143-0807%2F25%2F2%2FN01) .
6. ^ a b c d e f Cardarelli, F. (2004). Encyclopaedia of Scientific Units, Weights and Measures: Their SI
Equivalences and Origins (http://books.google.com/?id=6KCx8Ww75VkC) (2nd ed.). Springer.
pp. 2025. ISBN 1-8523-3682-X. http://books.google.com/?id=6KCx8Ww75VkC.
7. ^ Bennett, L. H.; Page, C. H.; and Swartzendruber, L. J. (1978). "Comments on units in magnetism".
Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards 83 (1): 912.
8. ^ A.P. French, Edwind F. Taylor (1978). An Introduction to Quantum Physics. W.W. Norton &
Company.
General literature
Griffiths, David J. (1999). "Appendix C: Units". Introduction to Electrodynamics (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
ISBN 0-13-805326-X.
Jackson, John D. (1999). "Appendix on Units and Dimensions". Classical Electrodynamics (3rd ed.).
Wiley. ISBN 0-471-30932-X.
Littlejohn, Robert (Fall 2007). "Gaussian, SI and Other Systems of Units in Electromagnetic Theory"
(http://bohr.physics.berkeley.edu/classes/221/0708/notes/emunits.pdf) (pdf). Physics 221A, University of
California, Berkeley lecture notes. http://bohr.physics.berkeley.edu/classes/221/0708/notes/emunits.pdf.
Retrieved 2008-05-06.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centimetre_gram_second_system_of_units"
Categories: Systems of units | Centimetre gram second system of units
This page was last modified on 30 July 2010 at 18:44.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may
apply. See Terms of Use for details.
Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
8/6/2010 3:01 PM