Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Obesity Independent Effects ART 2011
Obesity Independent Effects ART 2011
doi: 10.4183/aeb.2011.451
INTRODUCTION
Published data sustain that high-fat
diet (HFD) could have important
detrimental effects on arterial function.
Saturated fat intake has been linked to a
higher risk of cardiovascular disease by
increasing concentrations of LDL
cholesterol (1) and uptake of cholesterol
in the arterial wall (2). Moreover, high-fat
meals could lead to exaggerated
cardiovascular reactivity in healthy,
normotensive
individuals
(3).
Furthermore, leading to excessive
452
Figure 2. Effects of high fat diet on pulmonary arteries structure in non-sensitized (nonSR) orovalbumin
sensitized (OSR) rats. (A): Muscularized pulmonary arteries (with an external diameter lower than
150 m) from standard chow diet (Std)/ high fat diet (HFD) fed non-sensitized (nonSR)/ovalbumin
sensitized (OSR) rats. Histological examination reveals increase in muscularization of small pulmonary
arteries and perivascular inflammatory infiltrate induced by HFD feeding and /orovalbumine
sensitization. Scale bars represent 75M. (B): The wall thickness (%) was calculated as described in the
text (meanSEM). Both, HFD and ovalbumin sensitization increased the wall thickness of pulmonary
arteries as compared with standard chow fed non sensitized rats.Std_nonSR =standard fed non sensitized
rats (green bar); HFD_nonSR = high fat diet fed nonsensitized rats (yellow bar); Std_OSR = standard fed
ovalbumine sensitized rats (red bar);HFD_OSR = high fat diet fed ovalbumine sensitized rats (blue
bar).*: p<0.05 when compared HFD fed non sensitized rats with Standard chow fed non sensitized rats
(HFD_nonSR vs. Std_nonSR). #: p<0.05 when compared standard chow fed ovalbumin sensitized rats
with non sensitized rats (Std_OSR vs. Std_nonSR). $: p<0.05 when compared HFD fed ovalbumin
sensitized rats with non sensitized rats (HFD_OSR vs. HFD_nonSR).
453
internal
diameter)/external diameter x 100.
Leptin, angiotensinogen, losartan,
phenylephrine were all obtained from
Sigma-Aldrich Inc. (St Luis, MO, US).
Apelin 13 and the antagonist Apelin13[Ala13] were purchased from Phoenix
Europe GmbH (Germany). All the other
compounds used were of analytical grade.
RESULTS
Lung histological examination
revealed that HFD increased the
sensitization induced remodelling of
pulmonary arteries (Fig. 2A and 2B).
Both HFD feeding or ovalbumine
sensitization increased the wall thickness
and perivascular inflammatory infiltrate
(Fig. 2A) as compared with standard
chow fed non-sensitized rats. There was
a significant increase of the wall
thickness on HDF fed rats as compared
with standard chow fed rats (51.49
6.54% vs. 29.52 7.11%; (Fig 2B and
Table 1) only on non sensitized rats
(Fig. 2B). The ovalbumin sensitization
increased the wall thickness rats fed
with either standard chow (56.33
7.78% vs. 29.52 6.11%) or HFD
(73.08 5.39% vs. 51.49 6.54%). The
HFD increased the Phe -induced
vasoconstriction only on non sensitized
rats (83.96 3.01% vs. 69.27 4.43%).
On the other hand, the sensitization
amplified the Phe effects in pulmonary
arteries of rats fed with either standard
chow (86.25 2.90% vs. 69.27
4.43%) or HFD (93.08 1.88% vs.
83.96 3.01%) (Fig. 3A). In pulmonary
artery rings pre-treated with LEP the
HFD increased the Phe -induced
vasoconstriction on both non sensitized
(88.48 4.80% vs. 68.57 4.60%) and
sensitized rats (115.58 9.39% vs.
90.33 5.59) (Fig. 3B).
The LEP pre-treatment did not induce
any significant variation of Phe
induced
contraction
on
our
experimental conditions. Phe alone had
higher contractile effects on HFD fed as
compared with standard chow fed rats
non-sensitized rats; sensitization
Figure 3. Phenylephrine (Phe)-. induced contraction of pulmonary arteries rings from non sensitized
(nonSR) or ovalbumin sensitized (OSR) rats fed with standard chow diet (Std) or high fat diet (HFD).
Contractile effects of Phe were recorded in the absence (A) or in the presence (B-F) of leptin (B),
angiotensinogen (C), losartan (D), apelin 13 (E) and apelin-13[Ala13] (F). Results were expressed as
percentage from control contraction elicited by 40 mM KCl (average SEM). Std_nonSR =standard
fed non sensitized rats (green bar); HFD_nonSR = high fat diet fed non sensitized rats (yellow bar);
Std_OSR = standard fed ovalbumine sensitized rats (red bar); HFD_OSR = high fat diet fed
ovalbumine sensitized rats (blue bar).
*: p<0.05 when compared HFD fed non sensitized rats with Standard chow fed non sensitized rats
(HFD_nonSR vs. Std_nonSR).
^: p<0.05 when compared HFD fed ovalbumin sensitized rats with Standard chow fed ovalbumin
sensitized rats (HFD_OSR vs. Std_OSR).
#: p<0.05 when compared standard chow fed ovalbumin sensitized rats with non sensitized rats
(Std_OSR vs. Std_nonSR).
$: p<0.05 when compared HFD fed ovalbumin sensitized rats with non sensitized rats (HFD_OSR vs.
HFD_nonSR).
$^: p< 0.05 when compared the phenylephrine (Phe). induced contraction alone with results obtained
in the same diet group, with the same sensitization protocol, but in the presence of studied substances
(leptin, angiotensinogen, losartan, apelin 13 and Apelin-13[Ala13]).
456
Std_nonSR
Weight (g)
HFD_nonSR
Std_ OSR
HFD_ OSR
51.49 6.54*
83.96 3.01*
88.48 4.80*
80.76 4.83
81.59 4.66
92.76 4.64*
94.16 1.99$
Std_nonSR =standard fed non sensitized rats; HFD_nonSR = high fat diet fed non sensitized rats;
Std_OSR = standard fed ovalbumine sensitized rats; HFD_OSR = high fat diet fed ovalbumine
sensitized rats.
Phe = phenylephrine; LEP = leptin; AOGEN = angiotensinogen; LOS = losartan; AP13 = apelin 13;
F13A = apelin-13[Ala13]
*: p<0.05 when compared HFD fed non sensitized rats with Standard chow fed non sensitized rats
(HFD_nonSR vs. Std_nonSR).
^: p<0.05 when compared HFD fed ovalbumin sensitized rats with Standard chow fed ovalbumin
sensitized rats (HFD_OSR vs. Std_OSR).
#: p<0.05 when compared standard chow fed ovalbumin sensitized rats with non sensitized rats
(Std_OSR vs. Std_nonSR).
$: p<0.05 when compared HFD fed ovalbumin sensitized rats with non sensitized rats (HFD_OSR
vs. HFD_nonSR).
?: p< 0.05 when compared the phenylephrine (Phe) - induced contraction alone with results obtained
in the same diet group, with the same sensitization protocol, but in the presence of studied
substances (leptin, angiotensinogen, losartan, apelin 13 and Apelin-13[Ala13]).
457
DISCUSSION
Our data suggested that HFD
stimulated both the remodelling (Fig. 2)
and the vasoconstrictor responses
(Fig. 3a) of pulmonary arteries. The
obtained results were in agreement with
published data showing that dietary fat
intake could modulate vascular
reactivity
in
response
to
vasoconstrictors and vasodilators, as
well as expression of receptors for
vasomotor substances (13, 14). But the
majority of experimental studies about
impact of HFD on vascular function
used experimental models that
associated obesity and /or diabetes
mellitus and analysed only systemic
arteries.
The present study has demonstrated
for the first time that HFD could increase
the reactivity of pulmonary arteries on
alpha 1 adrenergic agonists on rats even
in the absence of obesity. In Fig. 1 there
are presented the body weights of study
groups and there was no significant
difference between standard chow fed
group and HFD fed group.
The
ovalbumin
induced
sensitization is an experimental model
which allows study of inflammation
dependent alteration of vascular function
(15). In Fig. 3A there are comparatively
presented the sensitization effects on
standard chow fed and HFD fed rats. In
both groups the sensitization induced an
increase of contractile responses to Phe
but, after sensitization there was no
significantly difference between study
groups suggesting an inflammatory
component of HFD dependent changes
of vascular reactivity. Actually, the
histological examination indicated an
458
459
References
1. Siri-Tarino PW, Sun Q, Hu FB, Krauss
RM. Meta-analysis of prospective cohort
studies evaluating the association of
saturated fat with cardiovascular disease.
Am J Clin Nutr 2010;91:535 ;546.
2. Seo T, Qi K, Chang C, Liu Y, Worgall
TS, Ramakrishnan R, Deckelbaum RJ.
Saturated fat-rich diet enhances selective
uptake of LDL cholesteryl esters in the
arterial
wall.
J
Clin
Invest.
2005;115(8):2214 -2222.
3. Jakulj F, Zernicke K, Bacon SL, van
Wielingen LE, Key BL, West SG, Campbell
TS.
A
high-fat
meal
increases
cardiovascular reactivity to psychological
stress in healthy young adults. J Nutr.
2007;137(4):935 - 939.
4. Lichtenstein AH, Kennedy E, Barrier P,
Danford D, Ernst ND, Grundy SM, Leveille
GA, Van Horn L, Williams CL, Booth SL.
Dietary fat consumption and health. Nutr
Rev. 1998;56(5 Pt 2):S3-19.
5. Hariri N, Thibault L. High-fat dietinduced obesity in animal models. Nutr Res
Rev. 2010;23(2):270-299.
6. Athyros VG, Tziomalos K, Karagiannis
A, Anagnostis P, Mikhailidis DP. Should
adipokines be considered in the choice of
the treatment of obesity-related health
problems?
Curr
Drug
Targets.
2010;11(1):122-135.
7. de Divitiis O, Fazio S, Petitto M,
Maddalena G, Contaldo F, Mancini M.
Obesity and cardiac function. Circulation.
1981;64(3):477 -482.
8. McQuillan BM, Picard MH, Leavitt M,
Weyman AE. Clinical correlates and
reference intervals for pulmonary artery
systolic
pressure
among
echocardiographically normal subjects.
Circulation. 2001;104(23):2797 -2802.
460
461