Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Topic: - Is the criticism Indian tribes merely gaud and albatross to countries economic
development justified?
Tribe forms a major portion with 8.2% of countries total population and sharing 15% of total
countrys land. They live in distinct climatic, hilly and forest land condition called as area of
isolation and people of fourth world.
The north eastern region (NER):-Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram,
Nagaland, Sikkim and Tripura.
The central tribal belt :- Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Dadar & Nagar Haveli, Daman
& Diu, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Rajasthan, and West
Bengal.
Other States and Union Territories: - Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu
& Kashmir, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu.
Inadequate infrastructure and development facilities in tribal areas for education, roads,
healthcare, communication, drinking water and sanitation.
Characteristic of Tribes
Government of India has National Commission, 5th and 6th Schedule for the protection and
administrative dispensation of tribals in the Central Indian States and North-Eastern Region
States providing them with special provisions for their welfare and development.
The Provision of Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 which confers
special powers to Gramsabha in 5th Scheduled Areas.
The National Tribal Policy covering various issues like alienation of tribal land,
rehabilitation, displacement, tribal forest interface, resettlement etc.
Tribal research institute providing planning inputs to state related to problem of tribes in
respective states.
The Tribal Sub-Plan (TSP) to raise economic and social status of tribals via integrated
development effort to develop their agriculture, animal husbandry, irrigation, forestry,
education, health and employment- Policy framework and administrative implementation
strategy.
To manifest the need of economic development planning commission in India initiated big
development projects. Majority of them fall up in tribal areas and on the lands owned by
tribals. Number of projects often called as economic development projects are as follows:(i)
Irrigation and Power Projects
(ii)
Industries Projects
(iii)
Mining Projects
(iv)
Forest and Wildlife Projects
These projects are taken up in areas rich in natural resources like water, minerals and ores
and forests. These areas mostly inhibited by tribal people who called them a whammy to their
society.
Vast tracts of minerals wealth in India lie in tribal areas and on the lands owned by tribals but
govt. complain that they rarely reap any benefit due to difficulties in acquiring land and
tribals susceptible nature towards their land.
Recent example a project in a joint venture between Sterlite Industries, a unit of Vedanta, and
the Orissa Mining Corp, a state government enterprise wants to begin mining in Niyamgiri
Hill, Orissa to feed Lanjigarh Aluminium refinery located in mineral rich state of Orissa
which has stop its operating due to a shortage of bauxite.
Niyamgiri Hill and its adjoining forest area, the house of the 8,000-strong Dongria Kondh
tribal group who opposed this step to mine their land.
Govt. stand
Want to create jobs in an improvised region and bring tribal people into the economic
mainstream.
Promised to fund school, clinics and engage in income generation projects in the area.
Mine would destroy the forest and disrupt the rivers in the Niyamgiri hills which are central
to the livelihood and identity of 8000 strong tribes.
Extensive displacement of tribals, loss of livelihood and identity and turn them to destitute.
With the hope to benefit economic growth it would only trickle down to the poor community.
It merely disturbed the traditional resource-utilization pattern and existing mode of
production with an advanced mode of production.
Process of acquiring land by govt. is an inevitable process leads to mass displacement of poor
tribals.
Land Rehabilitation & Resettlement Policy of govt. takes years for resettling displaced tribals
lead to bulk migration of these communities towards states for searching small- small jobs.
Govt. must stand for rather than provocative measure like eminent domain.
Help them by creating infrastructure necessary for agriculture growth.
Knowledge them to participate in agriculture growth and thereby increasing countrys GDP.
Creating market for tribes who are engaged with fishing, horticulture activities.
Policy making is rather simpler task than execution and implementation; govt. must take
several measures to successfully implement her policies.
Displacement of tribals from their land leads to disturbance of their life, livelihood and
destruction of their social, cultural, religious and economic traditions.
Various international organizations taking advantage their vulnerable nature might try to
seditious them, handling over illegal arms which lead to formation of new naxalism or
mujahidin groups. Putting them back in the backwardness of economic development.
Conclusion
In short post-independence period various measures govt. has initiated for their up-liftment
which are very well appreciated but some important factors are overlooked.
It is no harm to accept that we are wrong somewhere in the line that is why Supreme Court
and our acts are not accepted internationally. Govt. should reconsider her act and not criticize
tribals by words like gaud and albatross to countries economic development and helps
nation to build spirit of togetherness.
References:1. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/10253003/Indian-tribals-rejectVedantas-mining-proposal-in-sacred-hills.html
2. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/10234593/Tribal-peoples-victoryover-Vedanta-historic-moment.html
3. http://tribesindia.com/
4. http://www.downtoearth.org.in/content/has-government-weakened-its-case-againstvedanta
5. http://www.cseindia.org/
6. http://www.survivalinternational.org/news/5546
7. Geography of India Majid Husain, Chapter 13 Culture Setting
8. Creation of essay title- Taken help from UPSC CS 2012 Essay Paper
9. http://tribal.nic.in/Content/IntroductionScheduledTribes.aspx
10. Factors Influencing Socio-Economic Status of the Primitive Tribal Groups (PTGs) and
Plain Tribes in Andhra Pradesh (A Logistic Regression Analysis) by M. Sundara Rao and
2B. Lakshmana Rao,Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, A.P., India, Dr. B.R Ambedkar
University, Etcherla, A.P., India.
11. Development, Displacement and Rehabilitation of Tribal People: A Case Study of Orissa
by Sujit Kumar Mishra, Department of Economics, School of Social Science, University
of Hyderabad 500 046, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Name