Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Odum Fundamentals of Ecology
Odum Fundamentals of Ecology
of Ecology
FIFTI{ EDITION
EugeneP.Odum,Ph.D.
oJEcologt
LateoJUniversity
oJGeorglaInstitute
GaryW.Barrett,Ph.D.
of Ecolog4UniversityoJGeor$aInstituteof Ecologt
OdumProJessor
-rHorvlsoN
=+-*
BROOKS/COLE
TheScopeof Ecology
Ecology:Historyand Relevanceto
Humankind
Levels-of.OrganizationHierarchy
The EmergentPropertyPrinciple
TranscendingFunctionsand Control
Pro@sses
EcologicalIntertacing
About Models
DisciplinaryReductionismto Transdisciplinary
Holism
rl
1 Ecology:
HistoryandRelevance
to llumankind
The word ecologiis derived from rhe Greek oihos,meaning "household,"and logos,
meaning "study."Thus, the study of the environmentalhouseincludes all the organisms in it and all the functional processesthat make the house habitable. Literally,
then, ecology is the study o[ "life at home" with emphasison "the totality or pattern of relationsbetween organismsand their environment," to cite a standarddictionary definition of the word (Merriam-Webster's
CollegiateDictionory,1Othedition,
s.v. "ecology").
The word economics
is also derived from the Greek root oikos.As nom[s means
"management,"economicstranslatesas "the managementof the household" and, accordingly, ecology and economicsshould be companion disciplines.Unfortunately,
many people view ecologistsand economistsas advercarieswith antitheticalvisions.
Table 1-1 attempts to illustrate perceiveddifferencesbetween economicsand ecology. l-ater, this book will considerthe confrontation that resuhsbcauseeach discipline takesa narrow view of its subjectand, more important, the rapid development
of a new interfacediscipline, ecoiogical
economics,
that is begnmng to bridge the gap
betweenecologyand economics(Costanza,Cumberland,et al. I997; Barrettand Farina 2000;L. R. Brown 2001).
Ecologlrwas of practical interestearly in human history. In primitive society,all
individuals neededto know their environment-that is, to understandthe forcesof
nature and the plants and animals around them-to survive. The beginning of civilization, in fact, coincided with the use of fire and other tools to modify the environment. Becauseo[ technologicalachievements,humans seem to depend less on the
natural environment for their daily needs;many of us lorget our continuing dependence on nature for air, water, and indirectly, food, not to mention wasteassimilation, rccreation,and many other srvicessupplied by nature.Also, economicsystems,
of whatever political ideology, value things made by human beings that primarily
benefit the individual, but they placelittle monetary value on the goodsand services
of nature that benefit us as a society.Until there is a cdsis, humans tend to uke nat-
Iable 1-1
l"
t-
Economics
Ecologl
Schoolof thought
Cornucopian
Neo-Malthusian
Currency
Money
Energy
GroMh form
J-shaped
S-shaped
Selectionpressure
r-selected
K-selected
Technological
approach
Hightechnology
Appropriatetechnology
Systemservices
Resourceuse
Servicesprovided
by economiccapital
Linear(disposal)
Servicesprovided
by naturalcapital
Circular(recycling)
Systemregulation
Exponential
expansion
Carryingcapacity
Futuristicgoal
Exploration
and expansion
Sustainability
and stability
SECTION1
Ecology:Historyand Relevance
to Humankind 3
ps,
1n-
lry,
ictn,
ac:l)',
n5.
!rlcllnt
lap
rlL
of
ti-
,nhe
tnla:ts,
rl)
ies
.1t-
dy
ural goods and servicesfor granted; we assumethey are unlimited or somehow replaceableby technologicalinnovations, even though we know rhar life necessities
such as oxygen and water may be recyclablebut nor replaceable.As long as the lifesupport seruicesare consideredfree, they have no value in current market systems
(seeH. T. Odum and E. P Odum 2000).
Like all phasesof learning, the scienceof ecologyhas had a gradual if spasmodic
development during recorded history. The writings of Hippocrates,Aristotle, and
other philosophersol ancient Greececlearly contain referencesto ecologicaltopics.
However, the Greeksdid not have a word for ecology.The word ecolog,,is o[ recenr
origin, having been frrst proposed by the Grman biologist Ernst Haeckel in 1869.
Haeckel defined ecolosl as "the study of the natural environmem including rhe relations of organismsto one another and to their surroundings" (Haeckel 1869). Before this, during a biological renaissancein the eighteenthand nineteenthcenturies,
many scholarshad contributed to the subject,even though the word ecologrwas not
in use. For example,in the early 1700s,Antoni van Leeuwenhoek,best known as a
premier microscopist,also pioneeredthe study of food chains and population reguIation, and the writings of the English botanist Richard Bradley revealedhis understanding of biological productivity. All three of thesesubjectsare important areasof
modern ecology.
As a recognized,distinct field ofscience,ecologydatesfrom about 1900, but only
in the past few decadeshas the word becomepart of the generalvocabulary.At first,
the field was rather sharply divided along taxonomic lines (such asplant ecologyand
animal ecologl), but the biotic community concept of Frederick E. Clementsand
Victor E. Shelford,the food chain and material cycling conceptsof Ra1'rnondLindeman and G. Evelyn Hutchinson, and the whole iake studles o[ Edward A. Birge and
ChauncyJuday,amongothers,helped establishbasictheory for a unified 6eld ofgeneral ecology.The work of thesepioneerswill be cited often in subsequentchapters.
What can best be describedas a worldwide environmentalawarenessmovement
burst upon the sceneduing two years, 1968 lo 1970, as astronautstook the first
photographsof Earth as seen from outer space.For the first time in human history,
we were able to seeEanh as a whole and to realizehow alone and fragile Earth hovers in space(Fig. I-1). Suddenly,during the 1970s,almosteveryonebecamecon-
C H A P T E R1
cemed about pollution, natural areas,population growrh, food and energ/ consumption, and biotic diversity, as indicated by the wide coverageof environmental
concernsin the popular press.The 1970swere frequently referred to as the "decade
of the enyironment,"initiated by the first "Earth Day" on 22 April 1970. Then, in the
1980s and 1990s, environmental issueswere pushed into the political background
by concerns for human relations-problems such as crime, the cold war, government budgets,and welfare.As we enter the early stagesof the twenty-first century,
environmental concelns are again coming to rhe forefront becausehuman abuseo[
Earth continuesto escalate.We hope that this time, to usea medical analogy,our emphasiswill be on prevntionrather than on treatment,and ecologyas outlined in this
book, can contibute a great deal to prevention technology and ecosystemhealth
(Barrett2001).
The increasein public attention had a profound effecton academicecology.Before the 1970s, ecologywas viewed largely as a subdiscipline of bioiogy. Ecologisrs
were staffedin biology depanmenrc,and ecologycourseswere generallyfound only
in the biological sciencecurricula. Although ecology remains strongly rooted in biology, it has emergedfrom biologr as an essemiallynew, inregrarivediscipline thar
links physical and biological processesand forms a bridge berweenrhe natural sciencesand the social sciences(E. P Odum 1977). Most collegesnow offer campuswide coursesand haveseparatemajors,departments,schools,centers,or inslitutes of
ecology.While the scope of ecology is expanding, the study of how individual organismsand speciesinterfaceand useresourcesintensifies.The multilevel approach,
as outlined in the next section,brings together "evolutionary" and "systems"thinking, two approachesthat have tended to divide the field in recentyears.
2 levels-of-0rganizationHierarchy
Perhapsthe best way to delimit modern ecologyis to consider the concept o[ levels
of organization, visualizedas an ecologicalspectrum (Fig. 1-2) and as an extended
ecologicalhierarchy (Fig. 1-3). Hierarchy means "an arrangementinto a graded
setes" (Merriam-Webster's
CollegieteDicfionary,10th edition, s.v. "hierarchy"). Interaction with the physical environment (energy and matter) at each level produces
characteristicfunctional systems.A system, accordingto a standarddefrmuon, consists of "regularly interacting and interdependent components forming a unified
BIOTICCOMPONENTS
plus
Genes
t{
ABIOTICCOMPONENTS
Cells
++
t+
Organisms
t+
Matter
equals
BIOSYSTEMS
Organs
Genetic
systems
Cell
syslems
Populations
t+
Communities
r{
Energy
[||
Organ Organismic
systems
systems
Population
systems
Ecosystems
r
SECIION2
ntal
de
he
rd
Energetics
Evolution
Development
Regulation
Levets-of.Organization
Hierarchy 5
Behavior
Diversity
Integration
of
Tl'll5
rh
letli..
ut
;l-
ts..f
:h.
.k-
:ls
ed
ed
es
d
C HAPTER 1
Ecosphere
Biomes
Lanoscapes
t
t
Communities
t
Populations
t
OFGANISM
Ecosystems
No sefpointcontrols
(+ and -)
feedback
maantaanjng
pulsingstates
withinlimits
HOMEORHESIS
Organsystems
I
I
Tissues
.t
Sel-pointcontrols
(+ and-)
feedback
maintaining
steadystates
withinlimits
HOMEOSTASIS
Cells
Molecules
Atoms
SECTION 3
re
:o
tts
.n
'l-
.d
l;'
a
tl-
a
i-
t.
LE
te
tl-
(l-
3 TheEmergent
Propefi Principte
Al important consequenceof hierarchical organization is that as componems, or
subsets,are combined to produce larger functional wholes, new propenies emerge
that were not preseni at the level below Accordingly, an emergent property of in
ecologicallevel or unit cannot be predicted from the study of the componentsof that
level or unit. Another way to expressrhe sameconcept rs nonreducibie propenythat is, a property ofthe whole not reducibleto the sum ofrhe propeniesof the parts.
Though findings at any one level aid in the study of the next level, they never com_
pletely explain the phenomenaoccurring ar the nexr level,which musr itselfbe studied to complete rhe picrure.
Two examples,one from the physical realm and one from rhe ecologicalrealm,
will sufficeto illusrrate emergentproperries.When hydrogen and oxygen are combined in a certain molecular configuration, water is formed-a liquid wirh properties utterly different from those of its gaseouscomponents.When certain algaeand
coelenterateanimals evolvetogetherto produce a coral, an efficientnutrientiycling
mechanismis createdthat enablesthe comblned system to maintain a high rate of
productivity in watercwith a very low nutrient content. Thus, the fabulousproduc-
CHAPTER 1
tivity and diversity of coral reefsare emergentpropenies only at the level of the reef
community.
Salt (1979) suggestedthat a distinction be made betweenemergempropeties, as
defined previously,and collective properties, which are summationsof the behavior of components.Both are propertiesof the whole, but the collectivepropertiesdo
not lnvolve new or unique characteristicsresuking from the functioning of the whole
lniL Birth rateis an exampleof a population level collectiveproperty, as it is merely
a sum of the individual births in a designaiedtime period, expressedas a lraction or
percentof the total number of individuals in the population. New propertiesemerge
becausethe componentsinteract, not becausethe basic nature of the componentsis
changed.Partsare not "melted down," as it were, but integratedto produce unique
new properties. lt can be demonstratedmathematicallythat integrativehierarchies
evolvemore rapidly from their constituentsthan nonhierarchicalsystemswith the
same number of elements;they are also more resilient in responseto disturbance.
Theoretically,when hierarchiesare decomposedto theirvarious levelsoIsubsysrems,
the latter can still interac[ and reorganizeto achievea higher level of complexity.
Someattributes,obviously,becomemore complex and variableas one proceeds
to higher levelsof organization,but often other attributesbecomelesscomplex and
lessvariableas one goesfrom the smaller to the larger unit. Becausefeedbackmechanisms(checksand balances,forcesand counterforces)operatethroughout, the amplitude ol oscillations tends to be reduced as smaller units function within larger
units. Statistically,the va ance of the whole system level property is less than the
sum of the varianceof the parts. For example,the rate of photosynthesisof a foresr
community is lessvariablethan that of individual leavesor treeswithin the community, becausewhen one component siows down, another component may speedup
to compensate.When one considersboth the emergentpropenies and the increasing
homeostasisthat develop at each level, not all component parts must be known before the whole can be understood.This is an important point, becausesome contend
that it is uselessto try to work on complex populations and communitieswhen the
smaller units are not yet fully understood. Quite the contrary, one may begin study
at any point in the spectrum, provided that adjacentlevels, as well as the level in
question,are considered,because,as alreadynoted, some attributes are predictable
from parts (collectiveproperties),but others are no[ (emergentproperties).ldeally, a
system-levelstudyis itselfa threefoldhierarchy:system,subsystem(next levelbelow),
and suprasystem(nextlevelabove).Formore on emergenlproperties,seef. F. H. AIIen
and Starr(1982),T. F. H. Allen and Hoekstra(1992),and Ahl and Allen (1996).
Each biosystemlevel has emergentproperties and reduced varianceas well as a
summation of attributes of its subsystemcomponents.The folk wisdom about the
forest being more than just a collection of treesis, indeed, a first working principle
of ecology.Although the philosophy of sciencehas alwaysbeenholistic in seekingto
understandphenomenaasa whole, in recentyearsthe practiceof sciencehasbecome
increasinglyreductionist in seekingto understand phenomenaby detailed study of
smallerand smaller componenls.LaszLoand Margenau(1972) describedwithin the
history o[ sciencean alternation of reductionist and hoiistic thinking (redi{ctiorxism
constructionism
and atomism-holism
are other pairs of words used to contrast these
philosophicalapproaches).The law of diminishing retums may very well be involved
here, as excessiveellort in any one direction eventuallynecessitates
taking the other
(or another) direction.
The reductionistapproachthat hasdominatedscienceand technologysincelsaac
r
SECTION 4
ref
as
lc-t
rle
:\'
Llf
is
ue
e5
he
te.
1S,
rd
'r'the
Newton hasmade major contdbutions. For example,researchat the cellular and molecular levelshas establisheda firm basis for the future cure and prevention of cancersat the level of the organism.However,celllevel sciencewiil contribute very little
to the well-being or survival of human civilization if we understandthe higher levels
of organization so inadequatelythat we can hnd no solutions to population overgrowth, pollution, and other forms ofsocietal and environmentaldisorders.Both holism and reductionism must be accordedequal value-and simultaneously,not altematively (E. P Odum 1977; Barrett 1994). Ecologyseek slnthesis, not separation.
The revival of the holistic disciplinesmay be due at leastpartly to citizen dissatisfaction with the specializedscientistwho cannot respond to the large-scaleproblems
that need urgent attention. (Histodan L),nn White's 1980 essay"The Ecology of Our
Science"is recommendedreadlng on this viewpoint.) Accordingly, we shall discuss
ecologicalprinciples at the ecosystemlevel, with appropiate attention to organism,
population, and community subsetsand to landscape,biome, and ecospheresuprasets.This is the philosophical basisfor the organizationo[ the chaptersin this book.
Fortunately,in the past I0 years,technologicaladvanceshaveallowed humans to
deal quantitativelywith large,complex systemssuch as ecosystemsand landscapes.
Tracer methodology,masschemistry (spectrometry,colorimetry, chromatography),
remotesensing,automadcmonitoring, mathematicmodeling, geographicalinformation systems(GlS), and computer technologyare providing the tools. Technologyis,
of course,a double-edgedsword: it can be the means of underctandingthe wholenessof humans and nature or of destroyingit.
rp
le-
rd
he
lv
in
rle
.a
..),
an
ia
he
rle
to
ne
oI
ne
n5e
:d
ET
4 Transcending
Functionsand ContrulProeesses
Whereaseachlevel in the ecologicalhierarchy can be expectedto haveunique emergent and collectiveprope ies, there arc basic functions that operateat a]l levels.Examplesof such transcending functions are behavior,development,diversity, energetics,evolution, integration,and regulation (seeFig. l-3 for details).Someo[these
(energetics,for example)operatethe samethroughout the hierarchy,but others differ in modusoperandiat differentlevels.Natural selectionevolulion, for example,involvesmutations and other direct geneticinteractionsat the organismlevel but indlrect coevolutionaryand group selectionprocessesat higher levels.
It is especiallyimpoftant to emphasizethat although positive and negativefeedback controls are universal,from the organismdom, control is sel?oirlf,in that it involvesvery exactinggenetic,hormonal, and neural controls on growth and development, Ieadingto what is often called homeostasis. As noted on the right-hand side
of Figure 1-4, there are no set-pointcontrolsabovethe organismlevel (no chemostats
or thermostatsin nature). Accordingly, feedbackcontrol is much looser,resulting in
pulsing rather than sieady states.The term homeorhesis, from the Greek meaning
"maintaining the floq" has been suggestedfor this pulsing control. ln other words,
there are no equilibriums at the ecosystemand ecospherelevels,but there arepulsing
bclances,such asbetweenproduction and respirationor betweenoxygenand carbon
(the scidioxide in the atmosphere.Failure to recognizethis differencein cybernetics
encedealingwith mechanismsof control or regulation)has resultedin much confusion about the realitiesof the so-called"balanceof nature."
10 CHAPTER1
TheScopeot Ecology
5 Ecologicallnterfacing
Becauseecology is a broad, muLtileveldiscipline, it inrerfaceswell with lraditional
disciplinesthat tend to have more narrow focus. During the past decade,there has
been a rapid rise of interfacefields of study accompaniedby new societies,journals,
symposium volumes, books-and new careers.Ecological economics,one of the
most important, was mentionedin the frrst sectionin this chapter.Others that are receiving a greatdeal oI attention,especiallyin resourcemanagement,are agroecology,
biodiversity,conservationecology,ecologlcalengineering,ecosystemhealth, ecotoxicology,environmentalerhics,and restorationecology.
In the beginning, an interface effort enriches the disciplines being interfaced.
Lines of communication are established,and the experliseo[ narrowly trained "experts" in each field is expanded.However, for an interfacefield ro becomea new discipline, somethingnew hasto emerge,such asa new conceptor technology.The concept oInonmarket goodsand services,for example,was a new concept that emerged
in ecologicaleconomics,but that inidally neither rraditional ecologistsnor economists would put in their textbook (Daily 1997; Mooney and Ehrlich 1997).
Throughout lhis book, we will reler to natural capital and economiccapital. Natural capital is defined as the benefits and servicessupplied to human societiesby
natural ecosystems,or provided "free of cosf'by unmanagednatural systems.These
benehtsand servicesinclude purificadon oI water and air by natural processes,decomposition of wastes,maintenanceof biodiversity, control of insect pests,pollination o[ crops, mitigation of floods, and provision o[ natural beauty and recreation,
amongothers(Daily 1997).
Economic capital is defined as the goods and servicesprovided by humankind,
or the human workforce, tlpically expressedas the gross national product (GNP).
Gross national product is the total monetary value o[ all goods and serl,rcesprovided in a country during one year. Natural capital is typically quantifred and expressedin units of energy,whereaseconomic capital is expressedin monetary units
(Table 1-1). Only in recent years has there been an attempt to value the world's
ecosystemservicesand natural capital in moneury terms. Costanza,d'Arge, et al.
(1997) estimatedthis value to be in the rangeof 16 to 54 trillion U.S.dollarsper year
for rhe enrire biosphere,with an averageof 33 triliion U.S. dollars per year. Thus it is
wise to protect natural ecosystems,both ecologicallyand economically,becauseof
the benehtsand servicesthey provide to human societies,aswill be illustrated in the
chantersthat follow.
6 AboutModels
Ifecology is to be discussedat the ecosystemlevel, for reasonsalreadyindicated,how
can this complex and formidable systemlevel be dealt with? We begn by describing
simplifred versionsthat encompassonly the most important, or basic,propertiesand
functions. Because,in science,simplified versionsof the real world are called models,
it is appropriatenow to introduce this concept.
A model (by definition) is a formulation that mimics a real-world phenomenon
S E C T I O N6
^l
15
le
e-
),
\d.
xt5-
ed
o-
rtbt
:5e
letarn,
rd,
P).
:o:x.rt5
d's
aL.
tar
of
.he
rn8
.nd
ais,
AboutModels 11
1 2 C H A P T E R]
eitherthe herbivores
or rhe plants.ln rhiscase,the interactionfunction,I, could representseveralpossibilities.
Ir could be a no_preference
swirchi[ observntron
in the
realwotld showecL
that the omnivorep, eatseitherpr or pr, accordingto availability.
Or I could be specifiedto be a constantpercentage
valuei[ it wasfound that rhe dier
o[ P, rvascomposeclof, say, 80 percent plant and 20 percent animal narrer, rrre_
specrivco[ the srateo[ p, or pr. Or I cou]d be a seasonai
switchi[ pr feedson plants
during one part of the yearancLon animalsduring anorherseason.Or I could be
a
thresholdswitch il P, greatlyprelcrsanimalfood and switchesto plantsonly when
P, is rcducedto a low level.
Fccclbcrch
loopsare imporLant learuresoI ecologicalmodels becausethey repre_
sentcontrolmechanisms.
Figure l-6 is a simplilieddiagramoIa systemth fearures
a feedbackloop in which "downstream,,
ourput,or so;e part o[ ii. is fed backor .e
cycleciro affector perhapsconrrol"upstream.,
.o.pon.nrs. For exrmple,the feed_
back loop could representpredalion by 'downsrream',organisms,C, that reduceand
thereby rend to control the grouth o[,,upstream,'herbivoresor plants B and A in the
fooclchain. Often. such a feedbackacruallypromotesthe growth or survivalof
a
downstrcamcol]tponent,such as a grazerenhancingfhe growth of plants (a .,reward
feedback."
asit rvere).
Figure 1-6. Compartmentmodelwith afeedbackorcontrol loop that transformsa linear system into a partiallycyclical one.
Feedback loop
SECTI0N 6
AboutModels 13
-->
trn
:phe
t\''
let
re'lt5
la
c'n
Negative
14 CHAPTER
1 The Scope of Ecology
Energy
circuit
(A pathwayor
flowof energy)
Energy
source
(Sourceol energyfrom
outsidethesystem)
Consumer
(Usesproducer
energy
for self-maintenance)
-\
t--_r
-Y
----\.
-.L
--:
Heatsink
(Degradedenergy
afterusein work)
Producer
(Converts
and concentrates
sorarener9yl
t-
Slorage
{A compartmentoJ
energy storage)
-v-*
$.-.,.4\--
lnteraclron
(Twoor moreflows
of energyto producea
high-quality
energy)
Capitaltransaction
(Fow of moneyto
payfor flowof energy)
Heatsink(usedenergy)
SECIION 7
DisciplinaryReductionismto Transdisciptinary
Hotism 1O
7 llisciplinarylieductionismto Tlansdisciptinary
Holism
a gaper entltled "The Emergenceof Ecologr as a New lmegrarive Discipline,,,
ln
E. P Odum (1977) noted that ecologyhad becomea new holistii discipline, having
roots in the biologicai, physical,and social sciences,rather than jusr a iubdiscipline
ofbiology. Thus, a goal of ecoiogyis to link the natural and sociaisciences.It should
be noted that most disciplinesand disciplinary approachesare basedon increased
specializationin isolation (Fig. l-10). The early evoiution and developmentofecol_
DISCIPLINARY
specialzingin isolation
tI
MULTIDISCIPLINARY
no cooperation
CROSSDISCIPLINARY
rigid polarizationtoward
specific monodisciplinary
concepl
INTERDISCIPLINARY
coordination
by higher
levelconcept
TRANSDISCIPLINARY
multi-levelcoordinationof
entire education/ innovation
systern
16 CHAPTER 1