Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Report Case Study 1 Honda Yamaha War
Full Report Case Study 1 Honda Yamaha War
CASE SUMARY
In early 1950, there were 50 competitor fighting position in the Japanese
motorcycle market. Tohatsu was the first market share In Japanese motorcycle
compared to the Honda was number two market share different 20% to 22%. Other
different between these two manufacture between Honda and Tohatsu were debt in
equity with ratio 6 to 1 for Honda and 1.5 to 1 for Tohatsu. In 5 years short, Honda
undisputed leader of Japanese motorcycle because Tohatsu was grow at slow rate
and controlled rate. Then, Honda increase their share market at 66% per year and
was establish winner competitive strategy. It is because of rise in revenue and
lower the cost. In 1960, Honda was reported 10.3% after tax of sales and Tohatsu
loses 8% of sales where balanced sheet for Honda in debt of equity with ratio 1 to 1
and Tohatsu 7 to 1. It shows that Honda financial flow more efficiency than Tohatsu.
In 1964, Honda enemy was destroyed because of Tohatsu filled to bankrupt. It is
form the sales was decline, fund exhausted and bill unpaid. Therefore, from 50
manufacture motorcycle to 30 by 1960, 8 by 1995 and shrunk to 4 in 1965(Honda,
Yamaha, Suzuki and Kawasaki). Moreover, over the ten years, Japanese interested in
purchasing luxury good over durable good. Honda diversified into automobile cars. It
is to reduce of failure risk, company deployed its strongest forces in the automobile
venture and become the best troops. End of 1960, Honda share of the Japanese
motorcycle reach 65% and Ministry of the International Trade (MINIT) persuade
Honda to get out of the automobile business and merge with much larger car such as
Toyota and Nissan ignored this administrative guidance and by 1975, was obtained
more revenue from auto than motorcycles.
In 1981, Honda focusing on the automobile front and then Yamaha saw an
opportunity to attack and take territory in the motorcycle troops. Yamaha borrowed a
chapter from the ancient Ninja Warrior and lunch a sneak attack. Yamaha took
advantage when the enemy focuses on the automobile away at Honda market
shared. Therefore, Honda production was drop 65% to 40% by 1981. On that Yamaha
rise share by 25% in 1981. Then, Yamaha and Honda had nearly equal shared
motorcycle landscape which Honda Company was drop and Yamaha rise 38%. From
the R&D, Honda approximate 2% to 5% of sales than Honda more than 1% of sales.in
second phase, Yamaha do frontal attack which is Yamaha provide 18 model by 1981
rather than Honda only 17 model. So, Honda investing large scale automobile
production to U.S. besides that, Yamaha announced plan to construct a new
motorcycle factory with annual capacity one million unit exceeding Honda 200,000
unit and makes Yamaha the world largest motorcycle manufacture.
In 1982, Yamaha enjoyed rise in sales by 20% and ratio debt of equity was 3 to 1
rather than Honda 1 to 1. Over eighteen month Yamaha war raged and Honda share
increase 40% to 47% and Yamaha was drop 35% to 27%. This is because of massive
price cut and increase promotion fund and field inventories. Summer in 1982, there
were possible to buy 50cc motorcycle which 10 speed bicycle. Yamaha motor
plummeted which having over 50% heavy lose. Early 1983, Yamaha unsold stock
which half estimated of industry total unsold stock and then Yamaha cut in price.
April 1983, Harvey Davidson persuaded the US international trade commission and
give initial import by give tariff from 4.4% to 47.4%. In 1984, Yamaha parent with
Nippon Gakki which stake 39.1% for called emergency board meeting.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
1. AGGRESSIVE COMPETITIONS
To become the top producer of motorcycle market between Honda and Yamaha
worldwide. Yamaha try to attack Honda using battle plan Ninja like sneak attack
of quietly by increasing their capacity and dealing to produce more faster.
2. FINANCIAL BURDEN
Yamaha and its affiliated companies had a debt-to-equity ratio of almost 3 to 1. This
is because of ineffective strategic where they produce too much quantity of product
which is 4 million a year. Yamaha try to invest more than their cash.
3. LAUNCH SNEAK ATTACK
While Honda focusing on automobile, Yamaha took advantages of the fact that
Honda attention was focused on its automobile business by quietly increasing
motorcycle production capacity.
4. AGGRESSIVE PRODUCTION
Yamaha produces too much quantity of product in order to compete with Honda
which lead to increase production costs.
ALTERNATIVE STRATERGY
1. THE COMPANY NEED TO SET THEY OWN TARGET.
As in this case study, Yamaha and Honda is the big company that compete with each
other. So, they need to set the strategy target for the produced the product. Other
than that, if this company want to set a target they able to stop and see if company
on track at any point. If they cannot doing it, the company can analyse where the
problem is. They should be able to identify areas that are flourishing and present
greater opportunity more quickly. In here, Honda has own strategy target. In the
study case the Honda had strategy to included massive price cuts and increase in
promotional funds and field inventories. This is because if this company make this
strategy, they had a lot opportunity to compete with the Toyota. For example in the
case study, Honda was able to provide products to its dealers at costs that enabled
the dealers to earn profit that were 10% higher than the profit they could earn by
selling Yamaha motorcycles. The others example in this case study is the innovative
element of Hondas counterattack was the use of product variety as a competitive
weapon. So it will devote considerable resources toward new modal design and
production.
design new vehicle models and features an in designing new vehicle models and
features and in conceiving fresh techniques for building them faster and better. For
example in the case study,
other manufacturing to build their own brand to become more competitive in market
places and market shared.
4. Diversification.
Every manufacturing and any company will have to face risk and uncertainty
problem. So, it will depend on the management manufacturing to settle this thing
before it is happen such as happen to the Yamaha that was mistaken by thinking
their challenge when unnoticed by Honda. Hearing Koike's statement, Honda's
president, Kawashima was annoyed. Honda rapidly redeployed its forces. Over the
next 18 months, as the Honda-Yamaha War raged on, Honda's production share
increased to 47% while Yamaha's declined to 27%. The effects on Honda's attack of
new model proliferation and price cutting were overwhelming for Yamaha. By 1984,
Yamaha's losses were estimated to be 19 billion. Therefore, it need to some
alternative
to
solve
it
such
as
doing
diversification
yahama
investment.
producer, you cannot expect us to remain in the present number two position
forever.
EVALUATIONS
IMPLEMENTED