Effectiveness and Efficiency are elusive and confusing, but if you take a second, you'll realize that both

are important, but

you have to have a bit of both to really be the best teacher that you can be.
Efficiency is the ability to get through lesson plans, stay on target, keep control of the class, etc. It's the ability to get things
done in an organized matter. It also hints at a bit of consistency which is crucial for teacher.
Effectiveness is the ability to reach out to the students. The ability to take what they know...link it to what they don't
know...and then apply it to their lives in such a way that requires them to think and learn on a higher level. Effectiveness is
simply making the knowledge relevant to them, and really inspiring them to learn in ways that more teachers need to.
These two concepts go hand-in-hand, but if I had to pick one that was more important, it would be effectiveness. The
ability to reach the minds of students is a bit more important than having a perfectly organized classroom in my opinion.
Because sometimes the most organized teachers never come to the level of the students to really reach them. It's the
students that are important...not the textbooks and the lesson plans.
As a teacher, the students don't care what you know (efficiency) until they know that you care (effectiveness). I know it's a
trite saying, but it's true. I've put that to use in my teaching, and it's made such a difference in the classroom setting. Take
the time to reach out to them in the way that you teach.

Effective and efficient are very common business/marketing terms. However, most of us tend to mix their meanings
and usage occasionally (including myself), and that is why I decided to write on the topic.
First of all if you look for both terms in most dictionaries youll find very similar definitions (which makes the matter
even more confusing). Some dictionaries get it right, however. Here is the definition from Dictionary.com, which I
like:
Effective (adj.): Adequate to accomplish a purpose; producing the intended or expected result.
Efficient (adj.) Performing or functioning in the best possible manner with the least waste of time and effort.
If you want an easier way to memorize the difference, remember this sentence: Being effective is about doing the
right things, while being efficient is about doing the things in the right manner.
Lets use a practical example to illustrate the concepts. Suppose that two guys, Mark and John, are trying to change
a flat tire on their cars (each one has his own car).
Mark starts by taking out the jack and placing it under the car. He quite doesnt know where to position it, so he goes
by trial and error and wastes a lot of time doing it. After 20 minutes he finally manages to fix it, so he proceeds to lift
the car and change the tire.
As you can see Mark was doing the right thing, but he was doing it poorly. We can say that he was being effective,
but not efficient.
John, on the other hand, starts by grabbing a towel and cleaning the tire. He wants to make the thing shiny before
he changes it. And mind you he is very good and fast at cleaning every little detail of the tire.
We can say that John is being efficient, because he is cleaning the tire fast and throughly, but he is not being
effective, because cleaning is a step that is not required at all when changing a flat tire.
Now if we had a third person, Peter, who could change the flat tire using the right steps and doing it quickly, we
could say that he was both effective and efficient.

UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCES: LEADERSHIP VS.

MANAGEMENT
Is a good manager automatically a good leader? What is the difference between
leadership and management?

The main difference between leaders and managers is that leaders have people follow them while
managers have people who work for them.
A successful business owner needs to be both a strong leader and manager to get their team on
board to follow them towards their vision of success. Leadership is about getting people to
understand and believe in your vision and to work with you to achieve your goals while managing is
more about administering and making sure the day-to-day things are happening as they should.

WHILE THERE ARE MANY TRAITS THAT MAKE UP A STRONG LEADER, SOME OF THE KEY
CHARACTERISTICS ARE:

Honesty & Integrity: are crucial to get your people to believe you and buy in to the journey you
are taking them on
Vision: know where you are, where you want to go and enroll your team in charting a path for
the future
Inspiration: inspire your team to be all they can by making sure they understand their role in
the bigger picture
Ability to Challenge: do not be afraid to challenge the status quo, do things differently and
have the courage to think outside the box
Communication Skills: keep your team informed of the journey, where you are, where you are
heading and share any roadblocks you may encounter along the way

SOME OF THE COMMON TRAITS SHARED BY STRONG MANAGERS ARE:

Being Able to Execute a Vision: take a strategic vision and break it down into a roadmap to be
followed by the team

Ability to Direct: day-to-day work efforts, review resources needed and anticipate needs along
the way

Process Management: establish work rules, processes, standards and operating procedures

People Focused: look after your people, their needs, listen to them and involve them
In order for you to engage your staff in providing the best service to your guests, clients or partners,
you must enroll them in your vision and align their perceptions and behaviours. You need to get them
excited about where you are taking them while making sure they know whats in it for them. With
smaller organizations, the challenge lies in making sure you are both leading your team as well as
managing your day to day operation. Those who are able to do both, will create a competitive

5 Different Types of Leadership Styles

by Rose Johnson , Demand Media

Laissez-Faire
A laissez-faire leader lacks direct supervision of employees and fails to provide regular feedback to those
under his supervision. Highly experienced and trained employees requiring little supervision fall under the
laissez-faire leadership style. However, not all employees possess those characteristics. This leadership
style hinders the production of employees needing supervision. The laissez-faire style produces no
leadership or supervision efforts from managers, which can lead to poor production, lack of control and
increasing costs.

Autocratic
The autocratic leadership style allows managers to make decisions alone without the input of others.
Managers possess total authority and impose their will on employees. No one challenges the decisions of
autocratic leaders. Countries such as Cuba and North Korea operate under the autocratic leadership style.
This leadership style benefits employees who require close supervision. Creative employees who thrive in
group functions detest this leadership style.

Participative
Often called the democratic leadership style, participative leadership values the input of team members
and peers, but the responsibility of making the final decision rests with the participative leader.
Participative leadership boosts employee morale because employees make contributions to the decisionmaking process. It causes them to feel as if their opinions matter. When a company needs to make
changes within the organization, the participative leadership style helps employees accept changes easily
because they play a role in the process. This style meets challenges when companies need to make a
decision in a short period.

Transactional
Managers using the transactional leadership style receive certain tasks to perform and provide rewards or
punishments to team members based on performance results. Managers and team members set
predetermined goals together, and employees agree to follow the direction and leadership of the manager
to accomplish those goals. The manager possesses power to review results and train or correct employees
when team members fail to meet goals. Employees receive rewards, such as bonuses, when they
accomplish goals.

Transformational
The transformational leadership style depends on high levels of communication from management to meet
goals. Leaders motivate employees and enhance productivity and efficiency through communication and
high visibility. This style of leadership requires the involvement of management to meet goals. Leaders
focus on the big picture within an organization and delegate smaller tasks to the team to accomplish goals.

TYPES OF LEADERSHIP STYLES

1. The Autocratic Leadership Style
One leadership style dimension has to do with control and ones perception of how much control one
should give to others. For example, the laissez faire style implies low control, the autocratic style
requires high control while the participative one lies somewhere in between. Kurt Lewin (1939) called
these styles:authoritative, participative (democratic) or delegative (Laissez Faire).
Take an on-line Quiz on these Leadership Styles
Partly, your style choice on the control dimension is a matter of personal choice. The style has its
advocates, but it is falling out of favor due to the many weaknesses of autocratic

leadership. Some people have argued that the style is popular with todays CEOs, who have much
in common with the feudal lords of Medieval Europe.
2. Bureaucratic Leadership
An autocrat doesnt require a bureaucracy, but the autocrat and the bureaucracy goes together like a
hand and glove. One reason has be do with obedience to authority. In fact, one can make an
argument that in large groups such as the multinational corporations and government
agencies authority is the most common type of influence used.
3. The Coaching Style
A groom used to spend whole days in currycombing and rubbing down his Horse, but at
the same time stole his oats and sold them for his own profit. Alas! said the Horse, if
you really wish me to be in good condition, you should groom me less, and feed me
more. Aesops Fables.
A great coach is definitely a leader who also possess a unique gifts ability to teach and
train.They groom people to improve both knowledge and skill.
4. Cross-Cultural Leadership
Not all individuals can adapt to the leadership styles expected in a different culture whether that
culture is organizational or national. In fact, there is some evidence that American and Asian
Leadership Styles are very different, primarily due to cultural factors.
5. Emergent Leadership
The superior man understands what is right; the inferior man understands what will sell. Confucius
Contrary to the belief of many, groups dont automatically accept a new boss as leader. Emergent
leadership is what you must do when one taking over a new group.
6. The Leader Exchange Style
Sometimes known as leader-member exchange, the style involves the exchange of favors between
two individuals. An exchange can be hierarchical between the boss and subordinate or occur
between two individuals of equal status. For this leadership style to work, you need to know how to
develop, maintain and repair relationships.
7. The Laissez Faire Leadership Style
The style is largely a hands off view that tends to minimize the amount of direction and face time
required. Works well if you have highly trained, highly motivated direct reports.
8. Situational Leadership
In the 1950s, management theorists from Ohio State University and the University of Michigan
published a series of studies to determine whether leaders should be more task or relationship
(people) oriented. The importance of the research cannot be over estimated since leaders tend to
have a dominant style; a leadership style they use in a wide variety of situations.
Surprisingly, the research discovered that there is no one best style: leaders must adjust their
leadership style to the situation as well as to the people being led. Hershey and Blanchards Model
of Situational Leadership. Going back to the 1970s, the model primarily focuses on the nature of
the task as the major variable in choosing your style. In this model, there are four options: telling,
selling, participating and delegating.
9 Strategic Leadership
This is practiced by the military services such as the US Army, US Air Force, and many large
corporations. It stresses the competitive nature of running an organization and being able to out fox
and out wit the competition.
10. Team Leadership
A few years ago, a large corporation decided that supervisors were no longer needed and those in
charge were suddenly made team leaders. Today, companies have gotten smarter about how to
exert effective team leadership, but it still takes leadership to transition a group into a team.

11. Facilitative Leadership

This is a special style that anyone who runs a meeting can employ. Rather than being directive, one
using the facilitative leadership style uses a number of indirect communication patterns to help the
group reach consensus.
12. Influence Leadership Styles
Legacees Nine Spheres Model: The Elements of Social Influence
Here one looks at the behaviors associated how one exercises influence. For example, does the
person mostly punish? Do they know how to reward?
13. The Participative Leadership Style
Its hard to order and demand someone to be creative, perform as a team, solve complex problems,
improve quality, and provide outstanding customer service. The participative style presents a happy
medium between over controlling (micromanaging) and not being engaged and tends to be seen in
organizations that must innovate to prosper.
14. The Servant Leadership Style
The Roots Of Our Problems Are: Wealth Without Work, Pleasure Without Conscience, Knowledge Without
Character, Commerce Without Morality, Science Without Humanity, Worship Without Sacrifice, Politics Without
Principles. Mohandas K. Gandhi
Some leaders have put the needs of their followers first. For example, the motto of the Los Angeles
Police Department, To Protect and Serve. reflects this philosophy of service. But one
suspects servant leadership are relatively rare in business. Its hard to imagine a CEO who puts
the needs of employees first before the needs of the stockholders and the bankers.
Since transformational leaders to take their followers into the light or into the darkness, its helpful to
have a set of values that uplift, rather than destroy. One such set of values known as servant
leadership. While this leadership style has been around for thousands of years, the American Robert
Greenleaf coined the term servant leader in 1970 in his book The Servant as Leader.
This style rests on a set of assumptions (Greenleaf, 1983). In this case, it is not the leader who
benefits most, it is the followers. We have leaders not acting selfishly, but socially. A second aspect to
this is an orientation toward service with a primary orientation toward using moral authority. Finally,
the approach emphasizes certain positive values such as trust, honestly, fairness and so on.
15. The Transformational Leadership Style
Nothing so needs reforming as other peoples habits Mark Twain
The primary focus of the transformational leadership style is to make change happen in:

Our Self,

Others,

Groups, and

Organizations
The transformational style requires a number of different skills and is closely associated with two
other leadership styles: charismatic and visionary leadership.
16. The Charismatic Style
Throw away those books and cassettes on inspirational leadership. Send those consultants packing. Know
your job, set a good example for the people under you and put results over politics. Thats all the charisma
youll really need to succeed. Dyan Machan.
Do You Need Charisma? So do you need the charismatic leadership style? The answer is
no. One can be a small cog in the great machine. However, it you want to be a leader, if you want to
have followers, if you want to do anything great, you better have it.Transformational leaders need a
bit of charisma. But if you are in a large bureaucratic organization, you can use your authority and the
power associated with the position. Indeed, most people in large organizations lack charisma.

17. The Visionary Leadership Style

A symbol of the concept of Manifest Destinya strong held national belief (at the time) that opportunity lay on
the West coastprimarily to California. It become a vision for many.
Visionary leader often are able to capture the yearnings of the in statements such as the example
below:
Washington Is Not A Place To Live In. The Rents Are High, The Food Is Bad, The Dust Is Disgusting And The
Morals Are Deplorable. Go West, Young Man, Go West And Grow Up With The Country. July 1865, Horace
Greely Concerning Americas Expansion To The West .

The vision thing is something all great leaders have. It was seen through out history in
the great ones. For example, Alexander the Great clearly had a vision of how to make an
empire work.Visionary leadership has many different elements to it.
Its surprising how few leaders really have a clear view of what is happening socially or
economically in their industry, nation or globally. In one respect, you might say they are
blind. Leaders need a vision, but great leadership turns that vision into reality. So
remember:
If the blind shall lead the blind, both with fall into the ditch. The Bible, Matthew 15:14
18. Transactional Leadership
The approach emphasizes getting things done within the umbrella of the status quo;
almost in opposition to the goals of the transformational leadership. Its considered to be
a by the book approach in which the person works within the rules. As such, its more
commonly seen in large, bureaucratic organizations where political considerations are
part of daily life.
19. Level 5 Leadership
This term was coined by Jim Collins in his book Good to Great: Why Some Companys Make the Leap and
Other Dont. As Collins says in his book, We were surprised, shocked really, to discover the types of
leadership required for turning a good company into a great one. What he seems to have found is
what The Economist calls, The Cult of the Faceless Boss.
20. Primal Leadership Style
It would seem that just when you have it all sorted out, someone invents a new set of labels.
Golemans model of leadership is a relatively recent addition to the pantheon of leadership style. In
this case, it is Danel Goleman. A psychologist who can write in more scholar English, he was one of
the major people who popularized Emotional Intelligence and then followed it up with a book called
Primal Leadership. Worth taking a look at. Its based on the application of emotional intelligence to
leadership. The six leadership styles one can use are:

coaching,
pace setting,
democratic,
affinitive,
authoritative and
coercive.