Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Considerations in Pig Trap Design: by Duncan Warriner, North Yorkshire, UK
Considerations in Pig Trap Design: by Duncan Warriner, North Yorkshire, UK
By Duncan Warriner,
Pipeline Engineering,
North Yorkshire, UK
68
opening can take the form of a simple flangeblind flange arrangement or a more complex
quick opening hub-door arrangement more
commonly known as a quick opening closure.
For subsea applications, the same basic
principles apply. However, the trap may
require additional protection for the valves
and pipework in the form of a shielding frame
70
71
Mechanical Design
Considerations
In the first instance we need to understand
the applicable design code. As pig traps are
pressure vessels, pressure vessel design parameters must apply. However, unlike pressure
vessels, pig traps must be capable of retaining
pressure while allowing tools to be launched
and received. It is these tools which determine
the overall trap dimensions. Certain tools such
as the metal-bodied intelligent pigs are both
heavy and long and must be considered, along
with the internal pressure requirements, when
designing supports, lifting lugs and assessing
foundation loadings.
Trap design must also satisfy applicable
codes, whether it be PD5500, EN13445,
ASME VIII (Div 1 or 2), ASME B31.4,
72
Process Design
Considerations
As specialist pigging designers we look at
the requirements from several angles. In addition to an examination of pipeline configurations, pressures and diameters, the product and
its temperature and flow rates, we will seek to
define precisely what the systems have to do.
Will the tool(s) travel in one direction only,
forward or backward, or is two-way motion
needed? Other questions include: Is propul-
74
Practical Design
Considerations
In addition to mechanical and process considerations, the trap designer must consider
practical issues such as location, layout, environment and logistics.
Trap Components
The basic trap components are barrel,
reducer, neck pipe, branch nozzles, kicker,
drain, vent, blowdown, balance line, pressurizing line, thermal relief valve, pressure
indicator (pressure gauge), supports, lifting
lugs, earthing (grounding) lugs, end closure
and pig signaller.
Barrel. This is the major section of the
trap and the means by which the loading and
unloading of pigs can be carried out with comparative ease and safety. It is usually equipped
with an opening closure at one end while its
other end is welded to a reducer. For conventional pigging its diameter is usually a nominal
50 mm above the line size, while for intelligenttype pigs it is recommended that it be at least a
nominal 100 mm above the line-pipe diameter.
The barrel length is dependent upon the operating procedures, service, type of pigs, available
space, etc., but in general for launchers deploying conventional pigs - 2 x pig length, while for
receivers - 3/3.5 x pig length.
76
77
Generic Types
A pig trap can take a number of forms but
generally falls into the generic types such as bidirectional, vertical launcher, vertical receiver,
horizontal launcher, and horizontal receiver.
Innovations
Clearly at the forefront of any design considerations is the issue of health, safety and environment. Any reduction in manual intervention
or potential environmental risks is advantageous and we should look to achieve this where
possible for very frequent pigging operations or
those in very remote/hazardous locations. This
reduction in the number of times the vessel
needs to be opened can be achieved by the use
of multiple launching/receiving capabilities.
There are four main systems available:
Valve type Pig Launcher.
Vertical Multiple Pig Launcher.
Automatic Sphere Launcher.
Automatic Multiple Pig Launching (AMPL).
78
Pig launcher
80
Vertical Multiple Pig Launcher. This system is based around the space-saving solution
of a vertical pig launcher used on many
offshore installations. It is basically an
extended standard launcher, but with the
addition of hydraulically operated launch
pins that protrude into the oversize barrel
of the launcher. The f irst pig is loaded into
the throat of the launcher, and then the f irst
or lowest launch pin is extended. Another
pig is then loaded
that is held
up by the launch
pin.
Subsequent
pins and pigs are
then inserted until
the traps capacity
is reached.
The f irst pig
is launched in the
normal way. When
another pigging run
is required, the lowest launch pin is
retracted, and the pig
above it falls into the
throat of the launch-
Sphere Launcher
Inspection
into the pipeline. When the downstream signaller indicates the sphere has been successfully
launched, the front pin extends, the rear pin
retracts, the remaining spheres roll forward and
the system resets itself for the next launch.
Although widely used, this system is predominantly used for fluid removal and not for
physical line cleaning due to the sphere only
having one sealing face, and therefore a tendency to ride over solid residue in the pipe.
Automatic Multiple Pig Launching System
(AMPL). This system has been developed by
82
Having made all the necessary considerations during the design phase and ensured