You are on page 1of 3

Universidad del Norte Instituto de Idiomas

Exigencia Ingls V Speaking Rubric for Integrated Speaking


Assessment:
Relating Knowledge, Personal Experience and Views to
Listenings
Criteria and
Standards
Relation of
Knowledge,
Personal
Experience and
Views to
Listenings

x2

Excellent response to
selected question,
referencing their
knowledge, personal
experience and
views. Speaker does
an excellent job of
relating these to
listening(s).

Good response to
selected question,
referencing their
knowledge, personal
experience and
views.
Speaker does a good
job of relating these
to the listening(s).

Includes enough
information to last 23 min.

Includes enough
information to last 23 min.

Name: _________________________________________

Adequate response to
selected question,
referencing their
knowledge, personal
experience and
views. Speaker does
an adequate job of
relating these to the
listening(s); it could
be more focused.
Includes enough
information to last 23 min.

Limited response to
selected question,
lacking reference to
their knowledge,
personal experience
and views. These
may have little or no
connection to the
listening, and/or the
speaker does a poor
job of relating them
to the listening(s).
May not include
enough information
to last 2-3 min.

Total = ( ____
5) = _____

Very limited response


to selected question,
severely lacking
reference to their
knowledge, personal
experience and
views.
These may have little
or no connection to
the listening, and/or
the speaker does a
very poor job of
relating them to the
listening(s).
May not include
enough information
to last 2-3 min.

Vocabulary

Accurate use of
vocabulary. Excellent
range of vocabulary.

Mostly accurate use


of vocabulary.
Appropriate range of
vocabulary.

Occasionally
inaccurate use of
vocabulary. Limited
range of vocabulary.

Frequently inaccurate
use of vocabulary.
Very limited range of
vocabulary.

Many vocabulary
errors. Extremely
limited range of
vocabulary.

Accuracy

Few grammatical
errors but no
interference with
communication.

Occasional
grammatical errors
but no interference
with communication.

Occasional
grammatical errors
that interfere slightly
with communication.

Some grammatical
errors that interfere
slightly with
communication.

Frequent grammatical
errors that often
interfere with
communication.

Fluency

Speaker sounds very


comfortable

Speaker sounds
comfortable

Speaker shows ability


to maintain flow of

Speaker shows weak


ability to maintain

Speaker shows weak


ability to maintain

speaking. Minimal
pausing, minimal use
of filler words, and
accurate selfcorrection. No effect
on communication.

speaking. Minimal
pausing, minimal use
of filler words, and
accurate selfcorrection. No effect
on communication.

No perceived
memorization or use
of notes.

No perceived
memorization or use
of notes.

speech. Some
pausing and/or some
inappropriate use of
filler words. No effect
on communication.
Moments of perceived
memorization. No use
of notes.

flow of speech.
Moderate pausing
and/or inappropriate
use of filler words.
Minimal effect on
communication.

flow of speech.
Moderate pausing
and/or inappropriate
use of filler words.
Some effect on
communication.

Moments of perceived
memorization and/or
some use of notes.

Obvious
memorization and/or
regular use of notes

Pronunciation Deduction (-0.5): Significant pronunciation problems make many of the speakers ideas completely incomprehensible.
Universidad del Norte Instituto de Idiomas
Name: _________________________________________
Total = ( ____
Exigencia Idiomas VII Speaking Rubric for Integrated
5) = _____
Speaking Assessment:
Relating Knowledge, Personal Experience and Views to
Listenings
Criteria and
Standards
Relation of
Knowledge,
Personal
Experience and
Views to
Listenings

x2

Vocabulary

100

85

Excellent response to
selected question,
referencing their
knowledge, personal
experience and
views. Speaker does
an excellent job of
relating these to
listening(s).

Good response to
selected question,
referencing their
knowledge, personal
experience and
views.
Speaker does a good
job of relating these
to the listening(s).

Includes enough
information to last 23 min.

Includes enough
information to last 23 min.

Accurate use of

Mostly accurate use

70

Adequate response to
selected question,
referencing their
knowledge, personal
experience and
views. Speaker does
an adequate job of
relating these to the
listening(s); it could
be more focused.
Includes enough
information to last 23 min.

Occasionally

50

Limited response to
selected question,
lacking reference to
their knowledge,
personal experience
and views. These
may have little or no
connection to the
listening, and/or the
speaker does a poor
job of relating them
to the listening(s).
May not include
enough information
to last 2-3 min.

Frequently inaccurate

20

Very limited response


to selected question,
severely lacking
reference to their
knowledge, personal
experience and
views.
These may have little
or no connection to
the listening, and/or
the speaker does a
very poor job of
relating them to the
listening(s).
May not include
enough information
to last 2-3 min.
Many vocabulary

vocabulary. Excellent
range of vocabulary.

of vocabulary.
Appropriate range of
vocabulary.

inaccurate use of
vocabulary. Limited
range of vocabulary.

use of vocabulary.
Very limited range of
vocabulary.

errors. Extremely
limited range of
vocabulary.

Accuracy

Few grammatical
errors but no
interference with
communication.

Occasional
grammatical errors
but no interference
with communication.

Occasional
grammatical errors
that interfere slightly
with communication.

Some grammatical
errors that interfere
slightly with
communication.

Frequent grammatical
errors that often
interfere with
communication.

Fluency

Speaker sounds very


comfortable
speaking. Minimal
pausing, minimal use
of filler words, and
accurate selfcorrection. No effect
on communication.

Speaker sounds
comfortable
speaking. Minimal
pausing, minimal use
of filler words, and
accurate selfcorrection. No effect
on communication.

Speaker shows ability


to maintain flow of
speech. Some
pausing and/or some
inappropriate use of
filler words. No effect
on communication.

Speaker shows weak


ability to maintain
flow of speech.
Moderate pausing
and/or inappropriate
use of filler words.
Minimal effect on
communication.

Speaker shows weak


ability to maintain
flow of speech.
Moderate pausing
and/or inappropriate
use of filler words.
Some effect on
communication.

No perceived
memorization or use
of notes.

No perceived
memorization or use
of notes.

Moments of perceived
memorization and/or
some use of notes.

Obvious
memorization and/or
regular use of notes

Moments of perceived
memorization. No use
of notes.

Pronunciation Deduction (-0.5): Significant pronunciation problems make many of the speakers ideas completely incomprehensible.

You might also like