Professional Documents
Culture Documents
research@televisionpost.com
April 2014
April 2014
April 2014
When the matter finally came up for hearing on 17 July 2012, the TRAI counsel
stated that the regulator was inclined to consider the issues raised by the
broadcasters in the appeal and, in the meantime, TRAI would not take any coercive
action.
Taking into consideration the issues raised by the broadcasters in the TDSAT, the
authority decided to amend the said regulations by dropping contentious clauses
like ads only during natural breaks in live sporting events, time gap between two
consecutive ads and no part screen ads.
A draft of amended regulations was uploaded on TRAIs website on 27 August
2012, calling for the comments of the stakeholders. The draft had a provision
regarding enforcement of the prescribed restriction on duration of
advertisements on the clock-hour basis.
Following an extensive consultation process, the authority notified the amended
ad cap regulation on 22 March 2013, once again drawing protest from broadcasters.
The authority under its crusading chairman Rahul Khullar was firm in
implementing the ad regulation from 1 October 2013.
After some tough talking by the authority, the broadcasters agreed to follow the
12-minute ad cap from 1 October beginning with a phase-wise cut-down in ad
duration from July. In fact, the News Broadcasters Association (NBA) and Indian
Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) had communicated to its members to implement
ad cap in letter and spirit.
Meanwhile, the authority took the extreme step of taking the broadcasters to
court over violation in ad cap. The regulator filed complaints against 14 channels
at the Patiala House courts in Delhi on 16 August for not adhering to the ad cap
duration.
Rattled by the regulators move, the NBA rushed to the TDSAT in order to protect
its members from getting prosecuted by TRAI. The NBA in its plea alleged that
TRAI had filed cases against channels despite the matter being pending before
the tribunal.
The tribunal offered relief to NBA members by asking TRAI not to take coercive
action. The matter was put up for hearing on 11 November 2013. Buoyed by the
relief granted to the NBA, other broadcasters, particularly the regional ones,
also rushed to the TDSAT as the 1 October deadline for implementing the 12minute ad cap arrived.
The tribunal granted relief to one broadcaster after another and clubbed all the
cases for hearing on 11 November. The hearing in the case began on 11 November
and each of the petitioners presented its arguments in the case including the
lead petitioner, the NBA. The tribunal completed the hearing in the matter on 29
November and reserved its judgment.
April 2014
Even as the TDSAT was preparing itself to pronounce judgment in the case, the
Supreme Court issued a landmark order that would have major repercussions for
the broadcast sector. The apex court ruled that the TDSAT does not have
jurisdiction to examine TRAI regulations.
In the wake of the apex court ruling, the TDSAT dismissed the ad cap case on 11
December and asked the broadcasters to move the High Court. The NBA, along
with other broadcasters, moved the Delhi HC on 16 December and got interim
relief till 13 March.
In a jolt to the broadcasters, the Delhi High Court, while hearing a petition filed
by Hyderabad-based Maa Television Network against the sector regulators 12minute ad cap regulation, observed on 19 February that the cap on advertisements
is a reasonable exercise. The matter was posted for hearing along with the
other ad cap cases.
When the matter finally came up for hearing on 13 March, the Delhi High Court,
however, adjourned it till 6 May. As a result, the interim order preventing TRAI
from taking coercive action against petitioners remains in effect.
April 2014
Hindi GEC Primetime (19002300 hrs) ad duration per hour
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Month
Jun 12 Sep 12 Dec 12 Mar 13 Jun 13 Sep 13 Dec 13 Jan 14
Star Plus
16.8
15.5
16.8
17.0
16.3
15.8
13.9
13.8
Life OK
12.7
14.1
15.0
15.2
15.0
15.7
13.7
13.9
Zee TV
15.6
15.9
16.2
15.9
16.0
15.8
14.0
14.0
15.4
15.4
15.9
16.1
15.0
13.3
13.6
Sony
13.7
Entertainment TV
13.3
14.7
13.5
13.5
13.9
15.5
14.1
Sony Sab
15.9
15.8
15.7
15.4
15.6
15.7
14.2
16.2
As is evident from the table above, the major Hindi GECs (top 6 channels)
complied with the 16-minute ad cap during the quarter. However, none of the
major GECs (top 6 channels) had the right-sized haircut capping their ad time to
12 minutes in the beginning of October.
Star Plus, Life OK, Zee TV and Colors are following a 12+2 norm (12 minutes of
commercial time and two minutes of self-promotion) rather than the prescribed
10+2 regulation (10 minutes of commercial time and two minutes of selfpromotion). For the quarter beginning October, the MSM channels (Sony
Entertainment Television and SAB) have an overrun by 34 minutes during
primetime. However, since January, the MSM twain have also started following
the genre norm of 12+2 minutes.
If we analyse the average ad duration per hour vis--vis the full-day period, all major
GECs followed the 16-minute ad cap during the quarter ended September 2013. Even
in the following quarter (when the ad cap was implemented), all major GECs
(excluding Life OK and Sony TV) across the day fell in line with the 12-minute diktat.
In the month of January 2014, Sony also started following the 12-minute ad ceiling
(over the 24-hour period). Life OK, however, continued to sell inventory upwards of
12 minutes (at 13.6 minutes per hour average in the month of January 2014).
Hindi GEC - Full day (0000-2400 hrs) ad duration per hour
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Month
Jun 12 Sep 12 Dec 12 Mar 13 Jun 13 Sep 13 Dec 13 Jan 14
Star Plus
17.0
15.9
16.8
16.5
16.2
14.2
12.6
12.8
Life OK
13.5
14.8
15.5
15.7
15.5
16.0
13.6
13.6
Zee TV
13.4
13.5
13.4
13.2
12.8
11.3
9.7
9.7
14.5
14.8
15.2
15.2
12.8
11.7
12.2
Sony
13.6
Entertainment TV
13.5
14.3
13.5
13.0
12.1
13.1
11.8
Sony Sab
13.0
14.0
13.7
13.5
11.1
10.9
10.4
13.3
April 2014
So, how much will the discipline cost the Hindi GECs? Mapping out the average
ad inventory consumption for FY13, we have worked out a rate hike which the
GECs will have to impose to mitigate any revenue loss.
Star Plus and Colors are recommended to get hikes of 38 per cent and 25 per cent
respectively to guard their old revenues while Zee TV and SET will need to up
their ad rates by 1214 per cent.
Hindi GEC
Average
rates required to
FY13 (minutes
12-minute ad cap
neutralise the
per hour)
is followed (%)
impact of loss in
inventory (%)
Star Plus
16.5
(27.4)
37.7
Zee TV
13.4
(10.3)
11.5
Colors Viacom18
15.0
(19.8)
24.7
Sony Entertainment TV
13.7
(12.6)
14.4
So, how have the channels been impacted? Digging into the financial figures of
the listed entertainment broadcasters, we have found that ZEEL has been insular
to the ad time haircut while Sun TV Network has been negatively impacted. We
are looking at regional-language broadcaster Sun TV Network to understand how
the impact will be on regional GECs as well.
Ad growth of select listed broadcasters (%)
Listed entities
Zee Entertainment
10.5
34.3
Sun TV Network
(4.5)
(7.1)
TV Today
30+
20+
NDTV
0-2
0-2
20.5
3.1
Zee News
ZEEL has sustained its above-industry ad growth rate (20 per cent plus YoY in its
ex-sports portfolio), led by its flagship channel Zee TVs gain in primetime market
share and stronger performance of its regional portfolio. Launch of new channels
(Zee Anmol and &pictures) in the fiscal second quarter also helped by providing
higher saleable inventory.
Sun TV Network, however, found the climate harsh and the advertisers were less
receptive to its steep rate hikes. The strategy of hiking average primetime ad
rates beginning July by a steep 19 per cent did not work with the advertisers. Ad
8
April 2014
inventory was left unfilled and revenue fell by 4.5 per cent to Rs 234 crore (Rs
2.34 billion) in the fiscal second quarter ended 30 September and by 7 per cent in
the December quarter. The ad revenue contraction over the earlier-year quarter
was due to a decline in ad volumes.
Sun TV, which charges a broadcast fee from its content providers, has a problem
peculiar to itself. The company allocates eight minutes of ad time to its content
providers while reserving the remaining 1012 minutes of commercial time for
its own sales team to exploit. Bringing such high level of inventory down to 12
minutes would mean hefty ad rate hikes of 5060 per cent across the network.
In the short run, there will be trouble negotiating fruitfully with the advertisers
and Hindi GECs may find their growth rates moderated by the inventory they
have to shed due to the ad cap regulation. However, they are not against ad cap
as this will give them an opportunity to raise rates in the medium term by limiting
supply of inventory. Some of them have already hiked rates in bouts. Another
pertinent point to note is that Hindi GECs are part of bigger networks and hence
their strategic needs are more long-term so that they can get higher pricing for
their content.
The average ad consumption pricing for the genre is set to climb, making life
difficult for the bottom-of-the-pyramid advertisers. As for broadcasters, the
strategy will be to launch second GECs to create more space for advertisers to
consume.
April 2014
Hindi movie channels - Primetime (1900-2300 hrs) ad duration per hour
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Month
Jun 12 Sep 12 Dec 12 Mar 13 Jun 13 Sep 13 Dec 13 Jan 14
Zee Cinema
14.2
14.2
14.7
14.8
15.0
15.6
14.0
14.2
Star Gold
15.2
15.1
16.8
16.7
15.9
15.9
13.9
13.5
Sony Max
12.7
14.7
13.2
12.8
13.5
16.0
15.4
13.6
Movies OK
9.4
15.2
18.6
17.7
17.4
16.2
13.9
13.5
0.0
5.0
13.8
14.1
UTV Action
19.4
16.2
15.7
14.7
15.4
15.4
12.6
12.2
UTV Movies
20.0
15.9
15.7
15.9
15.5
15.7
13.1
13.8
Zee Action
5.6
6.1
7.0
8.3
8.3
7.4
7.9
8.9
Zee Classic
7.7
6.7
6.5
8.6
10.3
10.8
13.1
13.7
Zee Premiere
6.9
6.3
6.3
7.9
7.7
7.6
7.5
7.7
&Pictures
Hindi movie channels - Full day (0000-2400 hrs) ad duration per hour
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Month
Jun 12 Sep 12 Dec 12 Mar 13 Jun 13 Sep 13 Dec 13 Jan 14
Zee Cinema
14.7
14.2
15.3
14.6
15.4
14.6
11.6
11.9
Star Gold
12.9
13.5
15.8
16.0
16.3
13.3
11.3
10.9
Sony Max
14.8
14.9
15.1
15.2
13.7
14.2
13.6
10.6
Movies OK
7.9
13.0
15.4
15.3
15.8
13.4
11.2
10.9
0.0
4.6
10.6
11.3
UTV Action
12.7
11.1
11.1
10.4
11.1
11.0
10.1
8.8
UTV Movies
13.6
11.9
11.6
11.6
11.6
11.3
11.0
10.7
Zee Action
5.4
4.6
4.7
6.1
5.5
4.8
5.0
5.7
Zee Classic
5.5
4.9
5.1
6.7
9.3
8.9
10.0
10.5
Zee Premiere
5.7
4.5
4.5
5.9
5.8
5.5
5.2
5.3
&Pictures
The rate hike across the top three channels has to be in the range of 2125 per
cent. The argument that movie channels can up their ad rates to that extent as
they are the second most-watched genre just doesnt fly. The problem is that
they have had rate increases over the past few years and a correction of the
pricing has already taken place. As a strategy, major networks have launched
second movie channels to make inventory available to advertisers and consolidate
their revenues.
10
April 2014
Hindi movie channels - Average ad rate hike
Average
inventory FY13
(minutes
per hour)
Drop in average
inventory assuming
12-minute ad cap
is followed (%)
Average hike in ad
rates required to
neutralise the
impact of loss in
inventory (%)
Zee Cinema
14.7
(18.3)
22.4
Star Gold
14.5
(17.5)
21.2
Sony Max
15.0
(20.1)
25.2
Movies OK
12.9
(7.0)
7.6
20.2
18.5
24.7
22.0
22.9
22.9
24.4
20.3
Abp News
22.7
20.6
25.4
23.7
21.5
20.6
24.0
23.4
NDTV India
17.9
14.2
19.1
20.0
18.0
19.4
21.6
18.3
India TV
23.9
22.2
26.4
22.5
22.0
21.3
24.9
23.4
IBN 7
21.2
19.7
20.3
16.5
19.1
17.9
20.1
15.3
Zee News
18.3
18.6
23.8
22.9
22.5
20.1
21.6
19.7
News 24
18.7
18.1
22.4
19.0
18.9
20.4
19.4
15.8
DD News
7.1
7.8
9.2
13.0
9.3
8.3
9.1
10.8
13.5
13.4
15.4
18.5
17.7
16.2
18.0
15.2
Tez
11.9
13.1
17.0
18.1
20.6
18.6
20.8
18.0
Samay
11.0
12.1
13.2
16.1
8.1
8.6
10.4
12.5
11
April 2014
Even in the full-day cycle, there is no dramatic shift. The top-end consumption
has fallen, but only marginally. This, however, does not signal a positive trend
but only emphasises the fact that news channels have been unable to find takers
in thin viewing hours.
Hindi news - Full day (0000-2400 hrs) ad duration per hour
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Month
Jun - 12 Sep - 12 Dec - 12Mar - 13 Jun - 13 Sep - 13 Dec-13 Jan-14
Aaj Tak
18.1
17.0
20.8
19.1
19.4
19.8
21.1
17.9
Abp News
17.6
15.7
19.7
18.4
16.5
16.7
19.6
18.4
NDTV India
17.1
14.3
18.7
18.3
18.3
18.2
19.9
16.5
India TV
20.1
19.1
22.9
19.8
19.4
18.3
20.7
19.7
IBN 7
19.6
19.1
20.2
16.4
17.9
15.9
17.3
13.9
Zee News
15.8
15.5
20.1
19.3
19.9
17.5
19.2
15.9
News 24
14.5
15.1
17.2
14.1
14.9
15.5
15.5
12.9
DD News
5.3
5.2
6.1
8.2
6.5
6.7
6.9
6.9
13.5
11.4
13.2
15.1
15.1
14.4
14.4
12.4
Tez
12.0
11.9
14.6
14.8
16.2
15.4
16.4
14.5
5.5
7.1
6.9
9.2
5.6
6.0
7.1
9.3
Samay
rates required to
FY13 (minutes
12-minute ad cap
neutralise the
per hour)
is followed (%)
impact of loss in
inventory (%)
Aaj Tak
18.8
(36.1)
56.4
ABP News
17.9
(32.8)
48.8
India TV
20.5
(41.5)
70.8
IBN 7
18.8
(36.2)
56.8
12
April 2014
A small part of the loss can be absorbed by the sale of non-FCT properties such as
ticker, activation, digital and events. Hindi news broadcasters have already started
working on this revenue tap. But sitting at a very low level, this can go up at best
to 15 per cent of the revenues. The end result is that they will not be able to stop
from bleeding red ink.
Low in confidence, news broadcasters are not taking any steps to control the ad
time on their channels. The fate of commercial airtime is decided by seasonality
and availability of advertisers. Any shrinkage in inventory will impact revenues
and hit the bottom line hard, which is not even 10 per cent of the turnover.
The top three are not prepared to take the lead in fighting the price war against
the advertisers. They feel that advertisers will migrate to other news channels
and that there are too many of them waiting in the queue. A view running in the
industry is that an ad ceiling of 20-minute per clock hour would be reasonable.
By allowing their inventory to grow, Hindi news channels have pulled down their
effective ad rates to a very low level. This linkage impairs good content and the
consumer proposition is harmed. There is, thus, a business need to progressively
cut down on ad time, build better audience profile, and progressively jack up ad
rates. Unlike the GECs which target females, these channels, having a male skew,
will be able to get value in the medium term if they play their cards properly.
English news channels
The general English news channels are not so extravagant when it comes to consuming
ad time. They have adhered to the 16-minute per hour advertising schedule during
the two quarters through September 2013. They are, however, not in compliance
with the 12-minute limit and during the quarter ended 31 December 2013, have
actually upped their consumption due to elections across five major states in India.
Interestingly, CNN IBN is the heaviest consumer of ad time in the quarters
examined by TelevisionPost.com. Moreover, the last two channels are consuming
less than the permissible time, indicating that they are not able to evince
advertiser interest at the rates they want to sell. No wonder that they earn much
less than the other three.
English news channels are better behaved in the prime viewing hours stretching
from 711 pm. They, in fact, have stayed within the 16-minute mark for two
consecutive quarters ended September 2013. Even in the next quarter involving
elections, only Headlines Today crossed 16 minutes of ad duration per hour in
prime time. The TV Today English general news channel, in fact, has a better ad
uptake in this time zone, sending forth the message that anchor-driven shows
work for the genre. The top three revenue earnersTimes Now, NDTV 24x7 and
CNN IBNhave more popular anchors and command higher rates.
Headlines Today can be in the reckoning, making it a four-channel battle. News X
is clearly at the bottom of the heap and can be left on the sidelines.
13
April 2014
English news - Primetime (1900-2300 hrs) ad duration per hour
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Month
Jun 12 Sep 12 Dec 12 Mar 13 Jun 13 Sep 13 Dec 13 Jan 14
NDTV 24x7
11.9
12.3
13.6
14.0
12.2
12.0
14.0
12.6
Times Now
15.0
14.2
16.4
16.8
13.4
12.8
15.8
12.6
CNN IBN
16.4
15.7
16.1
15.8
14.0
14.1
16.0
15.3
13.8
15.1
15.0
13.0
13.0
17.7
13.0
9.2
8.1
5.6
5.0
6.8
6.7
6.9
News X
9.4
Even during the 24-hour period, English news channels were non-compliant to
ad cap during the December 2013 quarter. In fact, ad inventory has increased
sequentially in the quarter ended December 2013 (in the range of 1218 minutes)
because of elections in five states in India. English news broadcasters are also
opposing the ad cap in the Delhi HC. Inventory consumption in January 2013 is
lower and could be due to overall softness in the ad market.
English news - Full day (0000-2400 hrs) ad duration per hour
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Month
Jun 12 Sep 12 Dec 12 Mar 13 Jun 13 Sep 13 Dec 13 Jan 14
NDTV 24x7
13.7
13.8
15.4
16.3
14.2
12.8
15.8
14.2
Times Now
15.1
15.0
16.8
17.9
13.8
13.6
16.0
13.1
CNN IBN
19.0
18.9
18.8
18.3
15.8
15.4
18.2
17.0
9.7
11.6
12.0
11.3
10.3
12.2
10.8
News X
9.7
8.3
5.7
4.6
6.3
6.4
5.7
9.9
In case of a 12-minute ad cap regime, the equations among the top three channels
will come into play. They will have room to up rates substantially when they
together decide to choke the inventory. The fear, perhaps, is that they do not
have very large viewership numbers and are already priced high by the perception
that they command in the marketplace. Any flexing of muscles may lead to
advertisers deserting them.
For the English news channels, the hike will have to be in the range of 2356 per
cent, making it a tough ask. Though better placed than the Hindi news channels,
they will have to resort to non-FCT properties to mitigate the impact.
14
April 2014
English news channels - Average increase in ad rates
Average
rates required to
FY13 (minutes
12-minute ad cap
neutralise the
per hour)
is followed (%)
impact of loss in
inventory (%)
NDTV 24x7
14.8
(18.9)
23.3
Times Now
16.2
(25.8)
34.8
CNN IBN
18.7
(35.9)
56.1
16.3
16.4
16.8
16.3
14.7
13.9
16.0
15.2
CNBC Awaaz
17.4
17.4
20.3
18.5
15.3
15.5
17.3
16.1
NDTV Profit
10.9
10.6
12.2
12.8
13.2
14.2
14.8
14.7
Et Now
10.2
9.6
11.1
13.6
10.3
11.2
13.7
11.3
Bloomberg TV
13.4
11.9
12.1
12.1
11.0
11.0
1.4
10.6
Zee Business
14.3
13.0
13.8
13.1
11.8
12.0
11.7
11.0
Among the business news channels, ET Now is complying with the ad cap (over a
24-hour period). The TV18 channelsCNBC TV18 and CNBC Awaazwill,
however, have to implement hefty hikes to the tune of 3754 per cent, which is
almost impossible to come by in this macro-economic environment.
15
April 2014
Business news channels
Average
rates required to
FY13 (minutes
12-minute ad cap
neutralise the
per hour)
is followed (%)
impact of loss in
inventory (%)
CNBC TV18
16.5
(27.1)
37.2
CNBC Awaaz
18.4
(34.9)
53.5
ET Now
11.1
7.7
(7.2)
Zee Business
13.6
(11.5)
13.0
Revenue loss for news channels could be Rs 200 crore in first year
As stated earlier, news channels will not get commensurate increase in ad rates
to mitigate the impact of loss in ad inventory. This will force them to harness the
potential of non-FCT ad inventory to compensate for the loss of FCT ad revenue.
News channels are planning to get sponsors for tickers, banners, L-shaped
banners, etc. and have started having discussions with advertisers. Advertiserfunded shows could also increase during non-primetime.
We feel that out of the average 50 per cent ad rate hike that is required by news
genre as a whole (Hindi, English and business), they will be able to implement
only 25 per cent. Additionally, they will be able to get 57 per cent of the overall
revenue from non-FCT monetisation. Thus, news channels might lose 1012 per
cent of their revenue on the implementation of ad cap. This could translate into
Rs ~2 bn (Rs 200 crore) of lost revenue for the genre during the first year of
implementation of ad cap.
16
April 2014
Niche - Primetime (1900-2300 hrs) ad duration per hour
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Month
Jun 12 Sep 12 Dec 12 Mar 13 Jun 13 Sep 13 Dec 13 Jan 14
Animal Planet
13.8
14.3
14.0
13.9
14.1
14.8
13.1
13.6
Axn
16.8
16.4
17.3
18.1
17.7
14.6
16.5
14.9
15.9
15.7
15.9
15.8
16.4
16.1
15.7
15.2
14.7
14.9
15.2
14.9
15.2
15.4
Foodfood
11.9
12.5
12.8
12.9
12.0
12.5
14.2
17.7
Fox Traveller
15.4
15.1
16.0
15.6
15.8
15.6
16.0
15.2
History TV18
16.0
16.4
17.4
17.0
16.8
16.2
16.0
16.5
14.0
14.2
14.3
13.9
14.3
14.8
14.1
14.5
15.0
14.7
14.9
15.3
15.6
15.7
Star World
17.7
17.0
18.0
17.4
17.9
15.8
13.0
13.3
Tlc
15.3
15.0
15.0
15.2
15.0
15.2
14.7
14.6
Travel Xp Hd
15.0
15.5
12.8
14.1
15.6
15.4
10.3
11.1
Travel Trendz
0.0
12.4
12.9
11.3
2.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
During the 24-hour period, the violation of ad cap regulation is less severe by the
niche channels.
Niche - Full day (0000-2400 hrs) ad duration per hour
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Month
Jun 12 Sep 12 Dec 12 Mar 13 Jun 13 Sep 13 Dec 13 Jan 14
Animal Planet
11.6
11.7
11.6
11.6
11.7
12.0
10.9
12.4
Axn
12.2
11.8
13.0
13.3
13.3
11.1
15.1
13.7
14.9
15.1
15.3
15.1
15.1
15.1
15.4
13.8
13.0
13.3
12.8
12.2
12.2
12.8
Foodfood
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.0
9.7
10.5
12.4
15.7
Fox Traveller
13.4
13.3
14.0
13.9
14.6
14.8
15.3
14.8
History TV18
15.4
16.5
17.0
17.1
16.9
15.8
16.2
16.6
12.4
12.4
12.4
12.8
13.3
13.6
13.4
12.7
12.6
12.3
11.9
12.1
12.6
12.4
Star World
17.7
17.3
17.9
16.0
16.1
14.0
11.7
11.4
Tlc
15.0
14.7
14.9
15.0
15.0
14.9
14.9
14.8
Travel Xp Hd
15.0
15.2
13.5
14.4
15.6
15.5
10.2
11.2
Travel Trendz
0.0
11.6
12.8
10.5
2.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
17
April 2014
DB Corp
17.6
17.8
Jagran Prakashan
10.7
14.7
6.3
8.8
ENIL
12.3
12.7
Fever FM
11.2
24.9
DB Corp Radio
11.8
25.3
HT Media
April 2014
consumer experience but it might end up limiting choice in the medium to long
term, with smaller networks falling by the wayside.
April 2014
20
April 2014
Disclaimer: The contents of the report are offered for your private, non-commercial and information and discussion purposes only. No part of this report may
be (i) copied, photocopied, duplicated, stored or reproduced in any form by any means or (ii) redistributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other
person in whole or in part, for any purpose without the prior written consent of Indian Media Biz Pvt. Ltd. The report has been compiled or arrived from sources
believed to be reliable and in good faith, but no representation or warranty, express or implied is made as to their accuracy, completeness or correctness.
Indian Media Biz Pvt. Ltd. has not verified the factual accuracy, assumptions, calculations or completeness of the information. Accordingly, Indian Media Biz
Pvt. Ltd. accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss or damage arising from (i) the use of this communication (ii) reliance of any
information contained herein, (iii) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such Information or (iv) any action resulting there from. Indian Media Biz Pvt. Ltd.
provides the information for the purpose of the intended recipient's analysis and review and recipients are advised to verify the factual accuracy, assumptions,
calculations and completeness of the information. All estimates, expressions of opinion and other subjective judgments contained herein are made as of the
date of this document. This document does not constitute an offer of, or an invitation by or on behalf of Indian Media Biz Pvt. Ltd. or its affiliates or any other
company to any person, to buy or sell any security. Indian Media Biz Pvt. Ltd. does not intend to act as a stock broker and does not give recommendations on
buy/sell/hold of securities. Indian Media Biz Pvt. Ltd. or its affiliates may enter into an agreement with the company(ies) covered in this report relating to the
production of research reports. Indian Media Biz Pvt. Ltd. may disclose the contents of this report to the company(ies) covered by it and may have amended
the contents of this report following such disclosure. You must not rely on any statement we have published in our report without first taking specialist
professional advice. Nothing in the material is provided for any specific purpose or at the request of any particular person. Indian Media Biz Pvt. Ltd. is not
liable for any of the following losses or damages (whether such losses where foreseen, foreseeable, known or otherwise): 1. loss of data; 2. loss of revenue
or anticipated profits; 3. loss of business; 4. loss of opportunity; 5. loss of goodwill or injury to reputation; 6. losses suffered by third parties; or 7. any indirect,
consequential, special or exemplary damages arising from the use of on our published research reports regardless of the form of action.