Professional Documents
Culture Documents
, we have
, we have
9.1.3 An Extension
The pure bang-bang result in the model developed
above is a result of the linearity in the problem. The
result can be enriched as in Sethi(1973b) by
generalizing the resale value equation (9.3) as
follows:
where g is nondecreasing and concave in u. For this
section, we will assume the sale date t to be fixed for
simplicity and g to be strictly concave in u,i.e., gu 0
and guu < 0 for all t . Also, gt 0 , gut < 0 ,and g(0,t)=0;
see Exercise 9.5 for an example of function g(u,t).
and
.
Thus,
Also for all t > 0,
Finally, the cost of reducing the natural failure rate is
assumed to be proportional to the natural failure rate.
Specifically, we assume that C(u,h)=C(u)h denotes the
cost of preventive maintenance u when the natural
failure rate is h. In other words, when the natural
failure rate is h and a controlled failure rate of h(1-u)
is sought, the action of achieving this reduction will
cost C(u)h dollars.
It is assumed that
In the trivial case in which the natural failure rate h(t) is zero or
when the machine fails with certainty by time t (i.e., F(t)=1),
then
u*(t)=0, Assume therefore h>0 and F <1 . Under these
conditions, we can infer from (9.27) and (9.34) that
It is required that
We can calculate Jst in terms of the variables and
functions defined above
Let
and
be such concave functions
so that we can write the following state equations:
subject to
Note that
are constraints for a fixed machine
salvage time t . To apply the maximum principle, we
substitute (9.53)-(9.56) into the Hamiltonian (9.48),
collect terms containing the control variable uk , and
rearrange and decompose H as
and
and
That is, the decrease in salvage value is a constant
percentage of the purchase price if there is no
preventive maintenance. With preventive maintenance,
The salvage value can be enhanced by a proportional
amount.
Let
be the optimal value of the objective function
associated with a machine purchased at s and sold at
t s+1. We will now solve for
, s=0,1,2, and s<t 3,
where t is an integer.
Before we proceed, we will as in (9.64) denote by
Ws(k,t), the coefficient of uk in the Hamiltonian H, i.e.,
The optimal control is given by (9.65).
It is noted in passing that
so that
In this example
, which means that if there is
a switching in the preventive maintenance trajectory of
a machine, the switch must be from $100 to $0.
Solution of Subproblems. We now solve the
subproblems for various values of s and t (s < t) by
using the discrete maximum principle.