To: From: Subject: Date: Memorandum ‘THE AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL ‘AUCKLAND COUNCIL SUMMONSES TO COUNCIL WITNESSES ISSUED ON BEHALF OF HOUSING NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION ON 16 MARCH 2016 18 MARCH 2016 1. We enclose with this memorandum 18 statements of evidence in response to the witness summonses issued on behalf of Housing New Zealand Corporation (HNZ) on 16 March 2016, as follows: oo revpoasgrr yr seseap Joint Statement of Joao Machado and Paulina Wythes; Joint Statement of Gurvinderpal Singh, Stephen Van Kampen, Vanita Ranchhod, Cosette Saville and Tim Solomon; Joint Statement of Lee-Ann Lucas and Anna Papaconstantinou; Joint Statement of Marie Stainwright, Lindsay Wilson and Roger Eccles; Joint Statement of Panjama Ampanthong and Hamish Scott; Statement of Marc Dendale; Joint Statement of Roger Eccles and Sisira Jayasinghe; Joint Statement of Danni Briggs, Anna Jennings and Joy La Nauze; Statement of Eryn Shields; Statement of Douglas Sadlier; ‘Statement of Raj Maharjan; Statement of Mark Tollemache; |. Statement of Alison Pye; ‘Statement of David Sanders; Joint Statement of Ross Moffatt and Wayne Siu; Statement of Terry Conner; Joint Statement of Joe Jeffries and Emily Ip; and Joint Statement of Ewen Patience and Emily Ip. 2. The wording of paragraph 2(a) of the summonses requires each witness to produce to the Panel the witnesses’ “primary evidence on Topic 081 — Rezoning and Precincts (Geographical Areas), as well as any associated supplementary statements and maps’. 3. As noted in our email to Julie McKee dated 17 March 2016, given the broad wording of Paragraph 2(a) of the summonses, the witness summons could arguably require each witness to produce all primary statements prepared by that witness for Topic 081. However, it was always the understanding of HNZ and the Council that the witness ‘summonses were only intended to relate to the primary evidence, supplementary evidence and maps on rezoning for the following specific geographical areas: ststec7oss2670Page 2 J Machado, P Wythes - Sub Regional Overview G Singh, S van Kampen, C Saville, T Solomon, V Ranchhod — Wester Isthmus. L Lucas, A Papaconstantinou — Eastern Isthmus M Stainwright, L Wilson, R Eccles — Southern Isthmus P Ampanthong, H Scott - City Centre Fringe North Shore D Sanders — Overview E Patience, E Ip — Devonport and Peninsula R Moffatt, W Siu - Glenfield, Northcote, Birkenhead T Conner - Albany and Greenhithe J Jeffries, E Ip - East Coast Bays E Patience, E IP — Takapuna, Milford, Smales Farm South 'M Dendale - Overview 'S Jayasinghe, R Eccles — Urban Central and west D Briggs, A Jennings, J La Nauze - Urban South J La Nauze — Urban South supplementary statements D Briggs, A Jennings - Urban North and East E E Shields — Overview D Sadlier - Henderson R Meharjan- Massey, Ranui M Tollemache - Glendene, Sunnyvale, Glen Eden, New Lynn APye—Te Atatu APye-NORSGA 4. As recorded in our email of 17 March 2016, we have confirmed with Claire Kiman, Counsel for HNZ, that this was the intent of the summonses, and agreed that the evidence to be produced in response should reflect the above list (rather than, for instance, unnecessarily producing precinct evidence or rezoning evidence on geographical areas not listed above). 5. The affected Council witnesses have therefore confined production of their evidence in tesponse to the summonses of 16 March to the primary evidence, supplementary evidence and associated maps relating to the rezoning areas listed in paragraph 3 above. Dated this 18” day of March 2016 bo M Dickey/ Allan/D Hartley/T Fischer stera0ra832679