Re: Intent to injure J

to: mikemedia1

03/13/2010 06:43 PM

Yes but if we said shoulder checks were "in any manner" we shit the bed on
about 10 others this year alone where shoulder checks injured people. Let's
face it Mike ... we sell rivalries, we sell and promote hate and when a player
hits another player legally we can't drill him because he's a king rat! We
need a reason ... jumped and targeted the head, late, unsuspecting, elbow ... none
of the above. The little shithead knows the rules. Thanks for explaining on
NESN, takes balls where they want blood and a lynching in Boston. What Jack
Edwards said about Crosby was assinine.
Original Message
From: mikemedial
Sent: 03/13/2010 11:24 PM GMT
To: Colin Campbell
Subject: Re: Intent to injure

Trying to stem the tide. It says "in any manner" in the book.
------Original Messaqe-----From: CCampbell
To: mikemedial
Subject: Re: Intent to injure
Sent: Mar 13, 2010 6:08 PM
Wish it was or I would have used it to get that little RAT. It is attached to
a spear, cross check, charge, spear, knee, etc. You need an act to attach to
the intent. (Unfortunately)
Original Message
From: mikemedial
Sent: 03/13/2010 11:00 PM GMT
To: Colin Campbell
Subject: Intent to injure
......

da~ v /\7I (.0~

Is intent to injure a stand a~ne

Sent from my Verizon Wireles~~~~kBdfY\
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

NHL0032435