You are on page 1of 3

WATER MEMORY

The memory of water could be a fashionable phrase that's largely related to


homoeopathy and therefore the magnetic Jacques Benveniste following his and
others allergic reaction analysis work. At the time Benveniste was a number one
French medical scientist World Health Organization headed an outsized INSERM
laboratory, directed at medicine, allergic reaction and inflammation analysis. He
reportable that once white blood cells with an explicit substance on their surfaces
area unit exposed to an explicit protein, they unharness amino alkane in a very
manner which will be visibly monitored employing a magnifier. This work
generated a polemic however 'in smart faith' paper reviewed and revealed naturally
once referees might notice no flaws with the process and that they had delayed
publication for 2 years whereas awaiting freelance confirmation from by impartial
laboratories in Israel, Italy, and Canada.
These analysis groups reportable that although the number of that protein was
subjected to serial physical process and was apparently diluted several billions of
times, till there was basically none left, it still had Associate in Nursing evident
biological impact totally different from those apparent exploitation simply the
water utilized for the dilutions (the 'memory of water' a the topic has drawn lots of
dispute with several 'scientists' merely rejecting it outright while not learning the
proof. Also, it's not been a lot of usually accepted once the results were reportable
naturally as not consistent by Nature's self-acknowledged biased observers (the
Editor of Nature, a magician (!) and a malpractice investigator, none of whom had
any relevant scientific experience) and underneath oppressive, overly-demanding

(with over double the conventional weekly load of tests) and unsympathetic,
conditions, in a very restricted and hurried five-day trial (of five years and 5
laboratories work) with negative results from solely the one laboratory being
cherry-picked from amongst otherwise positive results.
The initial results were, however, confirmed in a very blind study by the
statistician king Spire and additionally in a very rather unconventional Nature
paper purporting to prove the alternative. They were later on comprehensively
confirmed by a blind multi-centre trial, and new results ensure similar phenomena.
In spite of this apparent confirmation by these many laboratories, there are a unit
still doubts (expressed by some) over whether or not the experiments area unit
really consistent and whether or not the noted effects could also be because of the
origin of the biological samples or human operator effects. Any support for an
impact has been found exploitation NMR.
The subject space was the topic of variety of peer-reviewed papers within the
journal homoeopathy (July, 2007) and therefore the field has been over-viewed.
though there's a lot of support for water showing properties that rely upon its
previous process (that is, water having a memory effect), the experimental proof
indicates that such changes area unit due primarily to matter and surface changes
occurring throughout this process. Certainly, merely stirring an answer could have
pronounced effects on the vessel's surface charge and chemistry which might last
for many minutes once the stirring has ceased. Another memory situation
considerations individual O: HO chemical bond possessing memory of their
physical temperature and pressure history that lasts over periods of minutes. This
hypothesis, though well revealed in peer-reviewed journals, wants any
substantiation. The by experimentation supported memory phenomena can't be

taken as supporting the essential tenets of homoeopathy though they will justify
some effects.

You might also like