Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Inland Empire Builders, Inc. v. Washington, 378 U.S. 580 (1964)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The Supreme Court dismissed three appeals challenging Washington state's business and occupation tax for lack of a substantial federal question. The appeals were brought by construction companies and individuals against Washington state officials seeking to invalidate the state's business and occupation tax as applied to them. The Court granted the state's motion to dismiss the appeals, finding that the appeals did not raise an important issue under the United States Constitution.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1964-06-22 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 378 U.S. 580 Docket: 849

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Supreme Court dismissed three appeals challenging Washington state's business and occupation tax for lack of a substantial federal question. The appeals were brought by construction companies and individuals against Washington state officials seeking to invalidate the state's business and occupation tax as applied to them. The Court granted the state's motion to dismiss the appeals, finding that the appeals did not raise an important issue under the United States Constitution.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Inland Empire Builders, Inc. v. Washington, 378 U.S. 580 (1964)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Supreme Court dismissed three appeals challenging Washington state's business and occupation tax for lack of a substantial federal question. The appeals were brought by construction companies and individuals against Washington state officials seeking to invalidate the state's business and occupation tax as applied to them. The Court granted the state's motion to dismiss the appeals, finding that the appeals did not raise an important issue under the United States Constitution.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    378 U.S.

    580
    84 S.Ct. 1910
    12 L.Ed.2d 1035

    INLAND EMPIRE BUILDERS, INC., et al.


    v.
    WASHINGTON et al.
    No. 849.

    HEBB & NARODICK CONSTRUCTION CO., Inc., et al.


    v.
    WASHINGTON et al.
    No. 850.
    Ian MURRAY et al.
    v.
    WASHINGTON et al.
    No. 851.
    Supreme Court of the United States
    June 22, 1964
    Seth W. Morrison, for appellants Inland Empire Builders, Inc. and others.
    T. M. Royce, for appellants Hebb & Narodick Construction Co., Inc. and
    others.
    Edward G. Dobrin, for appellants Ian Murray and others.
    John J. O'Connell, Atty. Gen. of Washington, John W. Riley and Timothy
    R. Malone, Special Asst. Attys. Gen., and James A. Furber, Asst. Atty.
    Gen., for appellees.
    Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and I.

    Henry Kutz, for the United States.


    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of a
    substantial federal question.

    You might also like