You are on page 1of 1

386 U.S.

212
87 S.Ct. 977
17 L.Ed.2d 870

Janet PHILLIPS and William Ross Phillips


v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 684, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States


February 27, 1967
Rehearing Denied April 10, 1967.

See 386 U.S. 1000, 87 S.Ct. 1311.


Janet Phillips and William Ross Phillips, pro se.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty.
Gen., and S. Clark Moore, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of
California, Second Appellate District.
PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of
certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Chapman v. State of
California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824.

Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice CLARK are of the opinion that the
judgment should be vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in
light of Chapman v. State of California, supra.

Mr. Justice HARLAN would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set
forth in his dissenting opinion in Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S., at
45, 87 S.Ct., at 839.

You might also like