Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LIBERTARIANISM A NOVEL - Academic Garbage PDF
LIBERTARIANISM A NOVEL - Academic Garbage PDF
A Novel
David W. Pritchard
Libertarianism: A Novel
by David W. Pritchard
with a new introduction by Ludwig von Mises
2011
Introduction
With the successful application of our justificationalist epistemology onto all the free,
rationally self-interested subjects, we have at last tied the final chapter concerning the
understanding of human action to a close. Humans act, therefore everything. All the mysteries of
means and ends have been demystified with an ever unassailable finality. We are not wrong.
This project will persist, despite the throes of petulant resistance put forth by those who wish to
shackle the intractable Ego to inauthentic sentiment. But we do not believe in sentiment; for we
have reason to suspect it is the enemy of Liberty.
What is Liberty? Leave me to do as I please. There is no Other. There is only I. Who can
still claim the subject is not the ontological apex, without a grimace escaping them? Who can
still suppress their chagrin upon propounding the legitimacy of obligation? Those who still insist,
nefariously and insincerely, to confiscate that which is most natural to I; namely, pursuing the
unlimited possession of All (there is to own). Do not mistake any mention of a we as a
reference to coalition. We do not coalesce, our ideas merely convene; for, I repeat, there is no
Other. Wherein claims are lain about such an existence, of the Other, therein evil lies too.
Precisely this is why the works here written possess an import of such magnitude, thus far
unparalleled by any other, vis--vis the beneficence of Man (with the most gold). All the myths
of altruicity, debunked; any notion of rapport, dismisseddiscarded. It will indeed prove
difficult, grating even, to reenter the world after the I's divestiture from the mythological Other;
but this is the nature of enlightenment. For we claim: Those who artificially boom, shall bust,
they must. Thus our ontological cycle dismisses intervention.
The weakest links need breaking, for they hinder our project of Progress (are there even
any more gold mines?). The empirics are in, and they unequivocally substantiate all the
arguments here enclosed. It is up to them, now, those with the shackles, to refute our doctrine
(except they actually can't because our axioms are true by definition).
L.V. Mises
"Glorify me!"
- Vladimir Mayakovsky
Argument
My prose style is smaller than yours,
and faster, and thus more likely
to succeed in the long run. If
we are going to constitute ourselves
we are going to constitute ourselves
without admitting I exist: you will
get angry and love will be
impossibly becoming. We all know
parking lots destroyed the romance.
Where now do we go, the intersection
of sentiments waiting to be quashed
by reason? I'm not me. I just am.
I. Statement of Purpose
I am the audience.
I am the free market.
I am the scaffolding of days.
I am the future.
I am not sure you understand.
I am the noble soul.
I am reverence itself.
I am Robot.
I am winning an award for freedom.
I am very interested in the movie Metropolis.
I am the movie Metropolis.
This would explain the categories painted on flags that, according to the
instructions, we were to hold at ninety-degree angles for the sake of historical
accuracy as we barreled forward in the name of unrest, hoping to come out on the
other side looking real good. But I can explain. I disagree. Dogmatism as
sympathetic response to the errant movements in the field. You better.
2.
The world is cheating at cards, and how. My kingdom for a game of Uno; perhaps
the hurricane was a good reason to stay indoors after all. I take it out on girls who
don't even deserve it, but we're not an infinite progression of careful ironists here,
so keep up and skip everything. Everything comes with a set of politics, from
silverware to the Coke machine spitting out all manner of sodas, attempting to
exemplify the gift economy, instantiating the unintended burden of the incurred
debt. But thankfully we've removed the kickstand from the subject position. In
order to live in a world of pure difference with the movement painted on, you
can't depend on your private sorrows. All that I could do, then upset the ground:
the limit at which the marching bands originate a new ethic of obsessive gestural
repetition.
3.
She threw away the list of reasons to go to football games. So much for the
cataphatic, which actually has nothing to do with morning rituals but still give a
sense of pleasure. This realization that three of the four burners on the range will
no longer function without a New Critical approach emerges as a new list. Buy
toothbrushes. Get tired and get a job. Thankfully, says the latest issue of Critical
Inquiry, the plan has caught itself like a baseball in a new system of resistance.
Movement in both directions! But what does that mean? Something whistles and
winks from the desk in the other room.
Postscript: Logic
Waiting for the train
to take us to Ikea, you turn
to kiss me. I am wearing a hat.
The scene falls away. The door
falls down. I am Cthulu and you
are the narwhal. We are twenty
thousand leagues away from our
luggage. Ethics feels like corduroy.
Images avail themselves of us. I am the only image I can remember, that is, I
exist. Don't you know anything about language? I invented it. It makes me look
good. I've been making speeches since the day I was born, using every word in
every proper way. Signification therefore has to do with protracted enunciations,
not in the name of excess but of clarity. This is where it differs from love, which
is merely an exchange of property written at the level of the body. I can give you
this toe as a symbol of my devotion, but in exchange you have to do exactly what
I say.
This is what I mean, too, by a constructive principle: I'm thinking of writing an
opera one day, in which a manangular, brooding, rugged, individualistic
named Andy confronts the ruthless, exploitative demon that is the government
allegorically obscured so that they don't come and take me away by a character
named something like Allstate Jonesall while grappling with the fundamental
human problem of why it is exactly that "love" exists. It doesn't, of course, if I
may ruin the ending for you. And what we learn is that the state invented this
savage notion of "companionship" to make money. This theme presents itself in
many ways in the rest of my work, so no one should be surprised, but I hope to
use the form of opera to prove that not only have I thought this through enough to
make it musical but that the world itself is an instrument waiting to be played,
named and tuned and all ready to go as soon as someone wraps his fingers around
it and pries out the melodies hidden within screaming RELEASE ME! BRING
ME INTO YOUR GLORIOUS FOLD OF HUMANITY! that is the ideal. But of
course nature cannot be human. The final moment will be Andy alone onstage
with a mirror, crying from the sheer beauty of it all in a Starbucks, that he and he
alone has had the strength to triumph above all else.
Interlude
My working title broke epiphany.
I was a robot turned landscape painter
turned genuine alterity moving across
sensations, feelings, the interior.
I'm talking about wearing new shoes and
combing my hair and moving across the
country on a whim. You no me,
I will be inviting everyone to a really
invisible party and riding a train home.
Can't we get tired? Can't we be apart?
Come to these colder shores
to claim your prose. This, it goes
without saying, is allegory.
XIII. Bildungsroman
Yeah.
Yeah.
I quit.
The train.
The ocean.
A crystal.
A dog.
Freedom.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Despite the fact that such a novel, as in the cases of those vaunted texts which
establish its precedent, could only come from a staggeringly individual effort,
a number of other staggering individuals contributed to its becoming such that it
would be an affront to their respective self-determinations were I not to single
them out:
Evelyn Pappas
Sam Stein
Kevin Grijalva
Maysam Taher
Christopher Schneck
Christopher Schaeffer
Brandon Lopez
Gary Patrick Norris
Nyusha Samiei
Luis Villa
and always
Jacob J. Billingsley.
Of course there are others who contributed, intellectually and otherwise, but
given the ideological and spatiotemporal constraints of list-making they will have
to find satisfaction implicitly, or simply write their own novels.
NOTES
In "Colloquy On Subjectivity," the line "there are things we live among, and to
know them is to know ourselves" comes from George Oppen's "Of Being
Numerous."
"A Knight At The Opera" interpolates sections of "Bohemian Rhapsody" by
Queen.
"A Conversation With Ayn Rand" takes its formal cues from the book Dialogues
by Gilles Deleuze and Claire Parnet.
"A Seventy Five Page Sex Scene" is an adaptation of text written by Gary Patrick
Norris.
"Love Song" interpolates a quote from Ayn Rand.
http://sonofapritch.tumblr.com