Professional Documents
Culture Documents
September 2002
Number 40
Probing Matter
This Factsheet will explain:
some of the techniques which scientists use to investigate matter;
some of the important discoveries which have been made using the
techniques;
the importance of this kind of investigation as an illustration of good
science practice.
Geiger and Marsden confirmed their results and realized that there was no
way that the existing model could explain the results obtained.
Before studying this Factsheet you should ensure that you are familiar
with the outline of the work of Rutherford from your GCSE course
Rutherford suggested a new model of the atom, which would explain the
experimental results the Nuclear model of the atom.
Diffuse negative
cloud
Before the scattering experiments, the accepted model of the atom was of
a homogenous blob of positive material with negative bits distributed
evenly throughout it, rather like a currant bun. Indeed, it was sometimes
called the Currant Bun or Plum Pudding model of the atom.
Rutherford realized that the large scattering angles could not be explained as
the sum of a large number of smaller scatterings, because the gold was too
thin. In order to account for the large scattering angles, the atom must
consist of a minute dense centre, in which almost all of the mass and all the
positive charge is concentrated, so that the majority of the particles went
through only slightly deviated by avoiding the central charge/mass
concentration, but some which went closer to the centres would be highly
deviated. He was able to calculate the relative size of the charge/mass
concentration which he called the nucleus from the proportion of
highly scattered particles. He concluded that the nucleus has a radius of the
order of 10-15 m, compared to the atom with radius of the order of 10-10 m.
Geiger and Marsden carried out an investigation, in which they fired alpha
particles (helium nuclei) at a very thin sheet of gold and measured the
proportion of particles which were scattered through various angles.
Evacuated
vessel
Ring of
detectors
Exam Hint: You may be asked to draw or complete paths like these.
They are parabolas. The closer the approach to the nucleus, the sharper
the bend.
The neutron remained undetected at this time.
Thin sheet of
gold
The results of this experiment caused the existing model of the atom to be
abandoned in favour of the nuclear model and completely altered our
understanding of matter. It ranks among the most significant investigations
in the history of science.
High energy
beam of alpha
particles
The result they expected, based on the model, was that the particles would
go through the gold, but would be deviated through small angles due to
electrostatic repulsions between the positive particles and the positive
charges in the atoms. Most of the particles did behave as expected, but to
their amazement, Geiger and Marsden found that some particles were
deviated by large angles, and some almost came back the way they had
entered.
gold nuclei
Investigations like these led to the discovery of quarks, the particles which
make up the proton and neutron.
This type of scattering is called inelastic because interactions between the
particles do not conserve kinetic energy.
Exam Hint: You may need to know more about Fundamental Particles.
On some specifications it is not required for the core syllabus, only as an
optional topic.
Physics Factsheet
Probing Matter
Exam Workshop
This is a typical weak students answer to an exam question. The
comments explain what is wrong with the answers and how they can
be improved. The examiners mark scheme is given below.
(a) The diagram shows a line of gold nuclei, such as might have been
the target for an alpha scattering experiment.
........
........
Add lines to the diagram to show the paths of the alpha particles.
(3)
Electrons
Gold atoms
1/3
(2)
(b) Write a short paragraph describing how the results of the
experiments changed scientific thinking.
Although the candidate has shown deviation, s/he has not shown an
understanding that the closer the line of approach to the nucleus, the
greater the deviation, nor is there any indication of a very large
deviation. At least three paths, one showing a direct approach and
a large deviation should have been shown.
(4)
Incident particles
Alpha scattering
Alpha particles
Target
Gold atoms
nucleons
(b) Explain why this experiment led to the conclusion that most of
the mass and all of the positive charge of the atom was
concentrated in a small space at the centre.
(3)
The deviations could not have been caused by any other arrangement.
The positively charged alpha particles were repelled by the positive
nuclei.
1/3
The candidate appreciates that the results cannot be explained by
the then accepted model, but does not really say why the nuclear
explanation is the only sensible one.
Examiners Answers
(a) (as shown on the first page) Three paths, parabolas, showing hardly
any deviation for paths between the nuclei, larger deviation for closer
approach, including one of about 1700.
Questions
1. Describe the alpha scattering experiments.
(b) Positive particles are deviated by the repulsion of the positive nucleus.
Since particles were deviated through different angles, matter must be
distributed unevenly. The large deviations must be caused by regions
of dense mass and charge. Since only relatively few particles were
deviated through large angles the dense regions must be small compared
to the atom as a whole.
Answers
1. See the text.
2. It is important that the vessel was evacuated so that the alpha particles
were deviated only by the gold atoms, not by extraneous air atoms or
molecules.