Consultation with relevant OGC / R&Q is required before proceeding with the engagement. [Contractual risks] changes in the scope of work that may not be reflected in the engagement letter. [Project environment risks] client staff not committed to project or no client project committee in place or client structure to take management decision not in place. [Resourcing risks] Higher level of complexity of the engagement (e.g. Multiple locations, significant multiple work teams and parties involved, long term engagement (more than one year
Consultation with relevant OGC / R&Q is required before proceeding with the engagement. [Contractual risks] changes in the scope of work that may not be reflected in the engagement letter. [Project environment risks] client staff not committed to project or no client project committee in place or client structure to take management decision not in place. [Resourcing risks] Higher level of complexity of the engagement (e.g. Multiple locations, significant multiple work teams and parties involved, long term engagement (more than one year
Consultation with relevant OGC / R&Q is required before proceeding with the engagement. [Contractual risks] changes in the scope of work that may not be reflected in the engagement letter. [Project environment risks] client staff not committed to project or no client project committee in place or client structure to take management decision not in place. [Resourcing risks] Higher level of complexity of the engagement (e.g. Multiple locations, significant multiple work teams and parties involved, long term engagement (more than one year
[Commercial risks] Significant fees (more than 100 K)
[Commercial risks] Issues may not be completely reflected in the deliverable [Contractual risks] Significant changes to the proposal/engagement letter/normal terms and conditions (such as liability cap, indemnity or addressees). Consultation with relevant OGC/R&Q is required before proceeding with the engagement. [Contractual risks] Changes in the scope of work that may not be reflected in the engagement letter [Contractual risks] Confidentiality Agreement requested not reviewed by OGC [Deliverable distribution risks] Deliverable will be widely distributed to a large number of third parties (which may include multiple customers) or to the general public, or will appear in an offering circular or regularly filling (see Matrisk #38) OR outside of the normal practice of your BU [Independence risks] Changes in the scope of work which would impair our independence for restricted clients [Project environment risks] Client management lack of experience/functional skills [Project environment risks]Restrictions on access to information or quality of information not sufficient to deliver properly the service [Project environment risks] Client is unclear about the work they want us to carry out/difficulty in estimating budget [Project environment risks] Project in difficulty with possibility of failure/high risk transaction will not occur or that has already failed in the past [Project environment risks] Unreasonable pressure on deadlines and timescales or unrealistic expectations so that a diligent approach to do the work may be impaired [Project environment risks] Major internal control weakness in areas where services are being performed [Project environment risks] Client staff not committed to project or no client project committee in place or client structure to take management decision not in place
[Resourcing risks] Higher level of complexity of the engagement (e.g.
multiple locations, significant multiple work teams and parties involved, long term engagement (more than one year))