Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hirsch, Klapdor, Kovalenko, Paes
Hirsch, Klapdor, Kovalenko, Paes
PHYSICS
ELSEVIER
LETTERS B
Kemphysik,
Germany
Abstract
Because of the fine-tuning problem in classical Majoron models in recent years several new models were invented. It
is pointed out that double beta decays with new Majoron emission depend on new matrix elements, which have not been
considered in the literature. A calculation of these matrix elements and phase space integrals is presented. We find that for
new Majoron models extremely small decay rates are expected.
PAW 13.15; 23.40; 21.6OJ; 14.80
Keywords: Majoron; Double beta decay; QRPA; Neutrino interactions
(1)
2n-+2p+2ee+24.
(2)
Table I
Different Majoron models according to Bamert/Burgess/
Mohapatm 191. The case IIF corresponds to the model of
Carone IlOl.
Case
Modus
Goldstone boson
Matrix element
L$.y. = -iq(aijPL
IB
BP+
no
PPd
yes
1
1
MF - MGT
IC
MF-MGT
ID
PBd4
no
IE
IIB
PB&#J
PBdJ
yes
no
Here, PR/L = l/2( 1 f ~5). Using Eq. (4) the amplitude corresponding to the Feynman graph is, in the
notation of [ 61
IIC
IID
PAfJ
PP&P
IIE
IIF
P/W4
PP4
3
3
hf,2
MGTo2
MFw2 -
h&Tw2
yes
-2
-2
MF-MCT
MCR
no
-1
,+fF2 -
hf~T~2
yes
gauge boson
-1
-2
MFw2 -
%Tw2
MCR
I(&)Im+%j2.%B,r
(3)
with m = 2 for P/%$-decays or m = 4 for p/3&5decays. The index cyin Eq. (3) indicates that effective
coupling constants g,, nuclear matrix elements M,
and phase spaces Gns, differ for different models.
As shown in Table 1, several Majoron models with
different theoretical motivation can lead to signals in
double beta decays which are experimentally indistinguishable. The interpretation of experimental halflife limits in terms of the effective Majoron-neutrino
coupling constant is therefore model dependent. Subsequently we give a brief summary of the theoretical
background on which our conclusions on the different
Majoron models are based.
Single Majoron emitting double beta decays
(Ovpp#) can be roughly divided into two classes,
n = 1 (case IB, IC and IIB) and n = 3 (IIC and IIF)
decays.
As has been noted in [ 71 as long as Ovpp decay has
not been observed, the three n = 1 decays are indistinguishable from each other. We will call these Majorons
ordinary, since they contain the subgroup IC, which
(4)
mimjaij + $bij
d4q
J
V,p-
+ h.c.
i.j
x-
+ bijPR)vj$*
(2rr)4
x (WF -
(q2 -
112;+ k)(q2
rn! + k)
(5)
WGT).
(g).M. = 1
VciVejbij.
(6)
i,j
2f
(7)
10
Ac.M.(O~/l/3#) = S&x
&i&j
k.i
x-
qbij
d4q
(2n)4(q2-m~+ie)(q2-m~+ie)
w6)7
x (w5 +
(8)
w5=/q(2(qz
yL2
+
ie)
(~l~-iq[g2A(Gwtl
- Gt@,)
(10)
+Pk)
-t-O.qdPn-J$)
(11)
(14)
where Aia and Bi, represent arbitrary Yukawacoupling matrices and N, are sterile neutrinos. The
corresponding amplitude for Ovfi@$ decay is
x ~,l/G!Md;
(12)
P,, (En) and Ph (EA) are momenta (energies) of
initial and final state nucleons, m, is the pion and M,
the nucleon mass and ,~uporiginates from the weak
magnetism.
The terms of wg are neglected compared to Wgdue
to theestimation (P,,+P,) < (P,-P,),
(E,-I$,)
5
0( Qpp) [ 91. Following [ 111 we will also keep only
the central part of the recoil term D. Although both
are approximations, which needs to be checked numerically, we do not expect it to affect any of our
conclusions.
Finally for vector Majoron models (case IIF) [ 81
Lzby = -4Yyp(CijPL
+ dijPR)VX + h.c.,
(13)
2.f
where Xc is the emitted massive gauge boson. The
effective coupling constant can be defined as in the
AD.M.(Ov@3+4) =
Jxja
(q2-m~+ie)(q2-m~+i~)(q2-m~+i~)
(WF -
WGT).
(15)
Although for AD.M.(Ovp&5~) the same combination of nuclear operators appears ( wF- War ) , note the
additional ( q2 - m2) - compared to A.M. (Ov@f~) .
JV&, in ( 15) is given by
Nija = -4 ( AioBjam,, f AjaBiamvi + BiaBjamN,,)
i- &Aj$%m@N,,.
(16)
II
in ,,, << pF
d3geiqr
u
fw(p,r)
m2R
=&
d qq e
CL + 20
(25)
(tL+w)*
(26)
(S) = ( i
ii
+ &B,,,wr,
I> t .
(17)
In-
(18)
Again, N, denotes a sterile neutrino and the derivative coupling of 4 accounts for the additional powers
of II in the phase space integrals. The amplitude for
n = 7 decays is the same as for the n = 3 case, discussed above, with the replacement: h/;ia= Xi,YhmN,.
Note that Xi, and & have the dimension of an inverse mass. Therefore, also (g) has a dimension of an
inverse mass. To define a dimensionless coupling constant in this case one would have to specify the symmetry breaking scale, which is however undetermined
by the model.
For the Majoron models considered in this work
there are five nuclear matrix elements to be calculated.
Within the closure approximation they are defined as
(19)
MGT& =
where
(NfIIh,2(~,r)T,+T,fo,a,IINi>,
(23)
djq
h,,,,(wr)
&r
(24)
Here ,Z = (EN - El) denotes the average excitation energy of the intermediate nuclear states. w = J,m
is the energy of the neutrino and since we assume all
neutrinos to be light, the indices on neutrino masses
have been dropped. Note that in order to define matrix
elements dimensionless we follow the convention of
[ 91. That is h,,,(r)
and h,z (r) are arbitrarily multiplied by the nuclear radius R = roAf with ra = 1.2 fm,
while hR(r) includes the nucleon mass. Compensating factors appear in the prefactors of the phase space
integrals.
We have carried out a numerical calculation of
these matrix elements within the pn-QRPA model of
[ 12,131. To estimate the uncertainties of the nuclear
structure matrix elements the parameter dependence
of the numerical results has been investigated. Since
the matrix elements Mar and MF have been studied
before [ 121, we will concentrate on MCR, MCTZ
and MFJ. MGT and MF can be calculated with an
accuracy of about a factor of 2 [ 121.
The matrix element MCR shows a very similar behaviour as MGT. This is in agreement with the expectation, since only the central part of the recoil terms
is taken into account, so that apart from the different neutrino potential MCR has the same structure as
MGT. Neither variations of the strength of the particleparticle force gpp nor a change in the intermediate
state energies significantly affects the numerical value
of MCR. We therefore conclude that MCR should be
accurate up to a factor of 2, as is expected for MGT.
Unfortunately, in the case of the matrix elements
MGTo2 and MFJ the situation is very different. Both,
variations of g,,,, or p, can change the numerical results
drastically (Fig. 1). In fact, it is found that MGT,,,z
displays a very similar dependence on g,, as has been
reported in pn-QRPA studies of 21@ decay matrix
elements [ 121. Especially important is that in the region of the most probable value of g,, MGT,,,zcrosses
zero.
Also for variations of the assumed average intermediate state energy a rather strong dependence of the
12
M. Hirsch et al./Physics
Table 2
Dimensionless nuclear matrix elements of Majoron emitting modes
calculated in this work.
Nucleus
MF - MOT
MCR
Ge 76
4.33
4.03
4.86
3.29
4.49
3.90
1.82
5.29
0.16
0.14
0.16
0.10
0.14
0.12
0.05
0.15
(Qsp - EI -
~2) npkekf(ek)d~k,
Se 82
MO 100
Cd 116
Te 128
Te 130
Xe 136
Nd 150
%B,
= aa *
*Fo2 - M~~o,2
N lo-3f
N lo-3*1
N 10-349
N lo-3f
N IO--W
N lo-3*1
1 :;I:::
(27)
13
Table 3
Values of phase space integrals calculated in this work.
Nucleus
p/34
n=l
n=3
(GFgAp.2.m;
In z 2S67r71n(2)fi(tn,R)*
Ce 76
I .25
Se 82
I .03 IO-15
MO 100
Cd 116
Te 128
Te I30
Xe 136
Nd IS0
1.80 IO_5
I .75 10-U
(g)O.M.
(~)c.M.
I .02
1.35
I .40
1.07
dC.M.
N m(y)
2.07
3.49
7.28
6.95
5.96
4.97
5.15
7.21
IO--6
10-17
IO_5
IO--5
IO_4
qjy.
(GF%A)~
f2
an = 64w7 In(2)ti
IO-9
IO_8
lo-*
10-l
10-Z
IO_8
10-n
IO_7
.(Qm-T).
Inserting the definitions of the corresponding amplitudes, it is clear that even if the half-life limit derived for the charged Majoron decay equals that of
the ordinary Majoron mode, limits on the charged
Majoron-neutrino
coupling constant will be weaker by
M, / ( Qpp - T) N 1000 ! (Note that this crude estimation is to first approximation
independent of nuclear
structure properties.)
A similar analysis can be easily done for double
Majoron emitting decays. Again, very crudely, a reduced sensitivity of (483)
.pr/(Qap
- T) N (few)
x I O4 for II = 3 double Majoron decay, compared to
ordinary Majoron decays, is expected. Here, the factor ( 487r2) is due to the phase space integration over
the additional emitted particle, while the latter factor
comes from the additional propagator.
One might think that since our definition of the
effective coupling constant for the n = 3 Ovpp@#
decays includes a factor mNa/mer where m& is the
sterile neutrino mass, one could get (g) easily as large
as wanted, since the mass of the sterile neutrino is not
bounded experimentally.
However, matrix elements
will fall off M N rn;f as soon as m& is larger than
the typical momenta. While for the matrix elements
Mot-/r for ordinary Majoron decays such a reduction
occurs starting from masses of exchanged virtual particles in the region of 100-1000 MeV, for Moroz/roz
the suppression will be important already for much
(G=~A)~ 2
(GI%A)~.~
au = 122881rgln(2)ti(m,R)2
aa= 215040?rgnz~In(2)fL(~n,R)2
6.32. 1O-g
1.01 . IO_7
1.85. lo-l7
1.60. IO-
1.28. IO-
1.06 . IO-l7
1.06. IO-l7
1.41 IO_6
1.21
7.73
1.54
I .03
I .20
4.83
4.54.
I .85
lo-*
10-17
IO--6
IO_6
10-Z
IO_7
lo-
IO-l5
Table 4
Comparison of half-lives calculated for different (&values for the
new Majoron models with experimental best fit values 116,i 8 J
Model
7.1,2((g) = lo-4)
Tl/Z((&?)
IBJCJIB
ID,IE,IID
IICJF
IIE
4 . 102*
I 08-42
2. 1028
4 104
1038-42
,022-26
= 1)
1022-26
2. 1020
~1/2exp
5.38. IO**
1.67. lO22
1.67 lO22
3.31 1022
14