Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Transport Phenomena in Food Engineering
Transport Phenomena in Food Engineering
www.elsevier.com/locate/jfoodeng
Abstract
Food Engineering development is related to the knowledge advances of dierent areas of Chemical Engineering and other engineering elds. One of these areas is Transport Phenomena, and the advances in mathematical analysis and computer tools help to
solve complex problems involving momentum, heat and mass transfer. Transport Phenomena applied to food processing presents
special challenges regarding the complexity of biological material and how it changes during the application of dierent transformation or preservation treatments. Study of the basic concepts of Transport Phenomena and their applications to analyzing, predicting and designing any process is an important step in the advance of Food Engineering. Some of those basic concepts and
examples of recent applications and research orientations are presented in this paper.
2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Transport phenomena; Food engineering; Rheology; Heat transfer; Mass transfer
1. Introduction
In the chemical, food and biological processing
industries, many similarities exist in the manner in which
the entering materials are modied or processed into the
nal chemical and biological materials. These dierent
chemical, physical, or biological processes can be separated into distinct steps that were originally called unit
operations. However, in Chemical Engineering the term
unit operations has largely been superseded by the
modern and descriptive term separation processes
(Geankoplis, 2003), but in Food Engineering there are
some preservation processes (sterilization, pasteurization, salting, refrigeration, etc.), which are not exactly
a separation, in this way the concept of unit operation
or process is applied in a more ample sense.
Many of these processes have in common certain fundamental principles or mechanisms; for example, the
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +52 2 229 2005; fax: +52 2 229 2009.
E-mail address: jwelti@mail.udlap.mx (J. Welti-Chanes).
0260-8774/$ - see front matter 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.05.053
114
Nomenclature
Symbols
Ci
molar concentration of component i (mol/m3)
Cp
specic heat at constant pressure (J/gC)
D
mass diusivity (m2/s)
f
friction factor
h
heat transfer coecient (W/m2 C)
Ji
mass ux of component i (kg/m2s)
K
thermal conductivity (W/m C), or consistence index (Pa sn)
km
mass transfer coecient (m/s)
n
ow behavior index ()
Ni
molar ux of component i (mol/m2s)
q
heat ux (J/m2 s)
T
temperature (C)
v
velocity (m/s)
Z
position 0 distance (m)
are not convinced of the importance of transport phenomena, possibly because of how the subject is taught
in the universities (Gekas, 1992). In addition to those
reasons, other aspects must be considered when applying the classic transport phenomena concepts to Food
Process Engineering, for example: the need to obtain
specic transport properties for a lot of food materials
and new products, the understanding of new technologies (high pressure, electric pulses, ohmic heating, etc.)
and their relationship with the transfer phenomenon to
be applied in each case, and the generation of specic
software and computational modeling or adaptation of
that used in Chemical Engineering to the needs of food
preservation processes.
In this paper some basic concepts of transport phenomena and examples of the present situation of applications and research in Food Engineering using these
basic concepts and the advances to resolve and to understand better this knowledge area are discussed.
Greek symbols
a
thermal diusivity (m2/s), or aspect ratio ()
D
gradient
c_
shear rate (s1)
g
viscosity (Pa s)
gp
apparent viscosity (Pa s)
l
viscosity (Pa s)
s
shear stress (Pa)
s0
yield stress (Pa)
q
density (kg/m3)
t
kinematic viscosity
U
volume fraction of walls ()
k d
d
qC p T a qC p T
qC p dz
dz
dC
3
dz
All three processes are quite dierent at a molecular level. However, there are certain analogies between them.
In eect, kinematic viscosity (m), thermal diusivity (a)
and diusion (D) have the same dimensions (L2/t). In
Ficks law, the molar ux varies with the gradient in
mol per unit volume; in the Fouriers law, the energy
ux is proportional to the gradient of energy per unit
volume (qCpT); and the momentum ux, given by the
rewritten Newtons law, varies with the gradient of the
momentum per unit volume (qv) (Cussler, 1984). These
analogies are shown in Table 1 (Welti-Chanes, MujicaPaz, Valdez-Fragoso, & Leon-Cruz, 2003a), together
with additional information about the kind of food
transport properties that are very important to evaluate
the phenomena to be studied for any process conditions.
The corresponding equations for momentum, heat and
mass ux in the particular case of convective motion are:
1 2
fv
sf
qv
qv 0
4
2
2
J i D
q hDT
h
DqC p T
qC p
115
Table 1
Analogies between momentum, heat and mass transfer
Analogous form
Variable
Molecular diusivity
Transfer coecient
Dimensionless number
Momentum transfer
Heat transfer
Mass transfer
qv (momentum/volume)
m (kinematics viscosity)
f (friction factor)
qCpT (energy/volume)
a (thermal diusivity)
h (heat transfer coecient)
Pr am
h=qC
St v p
C (mol/volume)
D (diusion coecient)
km (mass transfer coecient)
m
Sc D
St kvm
Le Da
N i k m DC i
6
fv
2
h
qC p
and
where the transfer coecient is equivalent to
km. Note that the driving forces in the momentum,
heat and mass ux are volume concentrations: (qv 0)
(expressed in momentum per volume), D(qCpT) (expressed in energy per volume) and DCi (mol per volume)
(Table 1).
Since the molecular diusivities have the same dimensions, a ratio of any of two of these leads to dimensionless numbers: the Prandtl (Pr) number for heat transfer
and the Schmidt (Sc) and the Lewis (Le) numbers for
mass transfer. Likewise, the ratio transfer coecients
to the ow velocity leads to the Stanton (St) number
for heat transfer, and the Stanton (St) number for mass
transfer (Table 1), numbers which are very important
for modeling and analyzing dierent food preservation
processes.
In addition to the previous mathematical models, a
useful and simple analogy relating all three types of
transport simultaneously is the ChiltonColburn model,
which is written as
k m 2=3 h=qC p 2=3 f
7
Sc
Pr
2
v
v
The group kvm Sc2=3 is called the jD factor for mass transh=qC
fer and v p Pr2=3 St Pr2=3 denes the jH factor for heat
transfer. The ChiltonColburn analogy agrees well with
a wide range of experimental data for ow and geometries of dierent types in forced convection systems.
Therefore, when an engineer is concerned with the
calculation of heat and mass transfer coecients, the
analogies are very useful. In this way, when heat transfer
and mass transfer occur by the same mechanism, the results of experiments on heat transfer may be used to calculate diusion processes, or vice versa. Also,
information obtained from a small-scale model can be
used to scale-up the process, or information obtained
with one substance can be extended to another substance. In very specic cases, Pr = Sc = 1, which means
that m = a = D, and heat and mass transfer measurements may be used to predict momentum transfer or
vice versa (Sherwood, Pigford, & Wilke, 1975; Treybal,
1981). But to apply the aforementioned concepts to evaluate or design any preservation process on food it is
3. Momentum transport
Momentum transfer is present in several processes of
the food industry in association with ow and involves
convection mechanisms between molecules (or groups
of molecules). On the other hand, foods are complex
systems, frequently with non-Newtonian behavior and
subjected to several conditions. Under these situations,
equations to describe momentum transfer are complicated. For this reason, empirical and numerical methods
have been developed to solve these equations, using a
practical approach. Equations used to describe momentum transfer are similar to those used for other transport
phenomena (mass and heat transfer) and they are mentioned in the transport analogies section. Among the
situations in which momentum transfer phenomena are
important, we can emphasize: uid mechanics (statics
and dynamics), and several unit operations such as mixing, uidization, pneumatic transport, sedimentation,
ltration, ultraltration, etc.
Specic examples of research orientation and applications on momentum transfer are presented in Table 5.
Sterilization, drying, extrusion, and packaging are some
of the examples presented in which momentum transport is an important phenomenon to be evaluated. Some
of these situations have been suciently studied as
the case of uid mechanics and we can nd several
116
Table 2
Examples of evaluation of momentun transfer properties in food systems
Product
Magnitude
Banana puree
0.460
0.477
0.486
0.478
Concentrated milk @ 25 C
@
@
@
@
22
32
40
50
and
and
and
and
C
C
C
C
0.123
0.103
0.081
0.060
@
@
@
@
40
50
60
70
Study
Reference
Velez-Ruiz and
Barbosa-Canovas, 1998
Eect of temperature
C
C
C
C
Apricot puree
Chicory extract
Property
Table 3
Examples of evaluation of heat transfer properties in food systems
Property
Magnitude
Study
Reference
250300
150165
0.230.09
3.362.19
3.293.79
Meat patties
Meat patties
Raw tortilla and tortilla chips fried
Raw tortilla and tortilla chips fried
Fresh seafood (calamari, cuttle,
prawn, octopus and squid)
Cornish pasty
3.3076
Surimi
1.64 @ 20 C
3.67 @ 40 C
Enthalpy (kJ/kg)
Surimi
392.6 @ 20 C
Potato
0.545 @ 50 C
0.957 @ 100 C
1.4667E7, 1.8410E7,
1.406E7 and 1.2990E7
3.3502.0
0.03650.0929
101.518.7
3.64, 3.39 and 3.94
Cooked rice
Corn our
2.79
Product
2
117
118
Table 4
Examples of evaluation of mass transfer properties in food systems
Product
Magnitude
Study
Reference
4.97E104.07E10 @ 30 C
7.62E106.36 E10 @ 45 C
10.1E108.19E10 @ 60 C
Papaya
4.32E5 @ 80 C, 1 m/s
4.56E5 @ 80 C, 2 m/s
4.77E5 @ 80 C, 3 m/s
4.2E112.5E11
Table 5
Examples of operations related to momentum transfer in food processes
Application
Comments
Reference
references with a detailed description of these phenomena. In other areas a better understanding of the phenomenon is intended and the study of food rheology
and rheological properties of food systems are the basis
to improve the knowledge in this eld.
Daud (1989)
Guilbert et al. (2002)
4. Food rheology
As it is well known there are several mathematical
models used to describe the rheological behavior of liquid foods. For example:
Newtonian model
s l_c
s K_c
Bingham model
s s0 gP c_
HerschelBulkley
s s0 K_c
6. Heat transfer
10
n
119
11
120
composition, shape and size (food or container), mechanisms for heat transfer in dierent process systems,
and application of new mathematical and computational tools are some priorities in heat transfer research,
oriented to improve quality, stability and security of
foods and some examples of advances and applications
of heat transfer phenomena are now presented in those
areas.
9. Computational uid dynamics and modeling of sterilization processes with natural convection
Optimization of canning requires an estimation of the
heat transfer rate, and in the case of solid or semisolid
foods which are usually assumed to be heated by pure
conduction a lot of analytical or numerical solutions
to the heat conduction equation have been presented
by dierent authors taking account of dierent parameters or process variables (can wall temperature, can
shape, boundary conditions, etc.), (Datta, Teixeira, &
Manson, 1986; Dincer, Varlik, & Gun, 1993; Akterian
& Fikiin, 1994).
Analysis and simulation of heat transfer in liquid and
semi-liquid foods (that show natural convection) is more
dicult and some eorts have been made to describe this
kind of heat transfer related to the sterility level and the
loss of quality (sensory and nutritional) (Rao & Anantheswaran, 1988). Datta and Teixeira (1987, 1988) predicted transient temperature and velocity proles
during natural convection heating of canned liquid
foods. They showed that the slowest heating zone is a
doughnut-shaped region located near of the bottom of
the can at about one tenth of the can height. Kumar
and Bhattacharya (1991), and Kumar, Bhattacharya,
and Blaylock (1990) carried out a simulation of the sterilization of a viscous liquid food in a metal can. Their
results showed that natural convection tends to push
the slowest heating region to the bottom of the can.
Ghani, Farid, and Chen (2003) showed that observation of the slowest heating zone is a dicult task and requires knowledge of detailed transient ow patterns and
temperature proles, due to the complex nature of heat
transfer in natural convection partial dierential equations used to describe this kind of heat transfer need
the application of numerical techniques, and for this
purpose the use of computational uid dynamics
(CFD) techniques seems to be a good decision. The
application of CFD could assist in a better understanding of the complex physical mechanisms that govern the
thermal, physical and rheological properties of foods
(Ghani, Farid, & Zarrouk, 2003; Grijspeerdt, Hazarika,
& Vucinic, 2003).
Ghani et al. (2003) evaluated the thermal process of a
canned liquid food (carrotorange soup) using CFD.
Results were presented in the form of transient temperature, concentration (microorganisms and vitamin C),
and velocity proles. They used PHOENICS code based
on the nite volume method developed by Patankar and
Spalding (1972). Then the governing equations for continuity, momentum, and energy conservation were
solved together with those for bacteria and vitamin C
121
122
12
123
124
References
Abu-Jdayil, B. (2003). Modelling the time-dependent rheological
behavior of semisolid foodstus. Journal of Food Engineering,
57(1), 97102.
Ade-Omowaye, B. I. O., Rastogi, N. K., Angersbach, A., & Knorr, D.
(2002). Osmotic dehydration of bell peppers: inuence of high
intensity electric eld pulses and elevated temperature treatment.
Journal of Food Engineering, 54(1), 3543.
Afonso, M. A., Hes, L., Maia, J. M., & Melo, L. F. (2003). Heat
transfer and rheology of stirred yoghurt during cooling in plate
heat exchangers. Journal of Food Engineering, 57, 179187.
Aguilera, J. M. (2002). Structure and food engineering. In J. WeltiChanes, G. V. Barbosa-Canovas, & J. M. Aguilera (Eds.),
Engineering and food for the 21st century (pp. 495511). Boca
Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Akterian, S. G., & Fikiin, K. A. (1994). Numerical simulation of
unsteady heat conduction in arbitrary shaped canned foods during
sterilization processes. Journal of Food Engineering, 21, 343354.
Al-Muhtaseb, A. H., McMinn, W. A. M., & Magee, T. R., (2004).
Drying kinetics of gelatin potato and corn starches. In: 9th
international congress on engineering and food CD-Rom. Montpellier, France.
Alvarado, J. de D. (1991). Specic heat of dehydrated pulps of fruits.
Journal of Food Process Engineering, 14, 189195.
Alzamora, S. M., Nieto, A., & Castro, M. A. (2003). Structural eects
of blanching and osmotic dehydration pretreatments on air drying
kinetics of fruit tissues. In J. Welti-Chanes, G. V. BarbosaCanovas, & J. M. Aguilera (Eds.), Engineering and food for the 21st
century. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Astrom, A., & Bark, G. (1994). Heat transfer between uid and
particles in aseptic processing. Journal of Food Engineering, 21,
97125.
Awuah, G. B., & Ramaswamy, H. S. (1996). Dimensionless correlations for mixed and forced convection heat transfer to spherical
and nite cylindrical particles in an aseptic processing holding tube
simulator. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 19, 241267.
Balasubramaniam, V. M. (1993). Liquid-to-particle Convective Heat
Transfer in Aseptic Processing Systems, Ph.D. Dissertation.
Columbus: The Ohio State University.
125
126
Engineering and food for the 21st century. Boca Raton, FL: CRC
Press.
Li, J.-Y., & Yeh, A.-I. (2003). Eects of starch properties on
rheological characteristics of starch/meat complexes. Journal of
Food Engineering, 57(3), 287294.
MacCarthy, D. A. (1985). Eect of temperature and bulk density on
thermal conductivity of spray-dried whole milk powder. Journal of
Food Engineering, 4, 249263.
Manson, J. E., Stumbo, C. R., & Zahradnik, J. W. (1974). Evaluation
of thermal process for conduction heating foods in pear-shaped
containers. Journal Food Science, 39, 276281.
Mauro, M. A., de Queiroz Tavares, D., & Menegalli, F. C. (2003).
Behavior of plant tissue in osmotic solutions. Journal of Food
Engineering, 56(1), 115.
Marcotte, M., & Baik, O. D. (2001). Moisture diusivity during baking
of cake batter. In J. Welti-Chanes, G. V. Barbosa-Canovas, & J. M.
Aguilera (Eds.), Proceedings of the eight international congress on
engineering and food (pp. 394399). Pennsylvania: Technomic
Publishing, Co. Inc.
Moreira, R., Chenlo, F., & Pereira, G. (2003). Viscosities of ternary
aqueous solutions with glucose and sodium chloride employed in
osmotic dehydration operation. Journal of Food Engineering, 57(2),
153157.
Moreira, R., & Sereno, A. M. (2003). Evaluation of mass transfer
coecients and volumetric shrinkage during osmotic dehydration
of apple using sucrose solutions in static and non-static conditions.
Journal of Food Engineering, 57(1), 2531.
Moreira, R., Palau, J., & Sun, X. (1995). Simultaneous heat and mass
transfer during the deep fat frying of tortilla chips. Journal of Food
Process Engineering, 18, 307320.
Mujica-Paz, H., Valdez-Fragoso, A., Lopez-Malo, A., Palou, E., &
Welti-Chanes, J. (2003). Impregnation and osmotic dehydration of
some fruits. Eect of the vacuum pressure and concentration.
Journal of Food Engineering, 57(4), 305314.
Mwangi, J. M., Datta, A. K., & Rizvi, S. S. (1992). Heat transfer in
aseptic processing of particulate foods, as cited in Sing, R. K.,
Nelson, P. E. (1995). Advances in Aseptic Processing Technologies
(pp. 73102). London: Elsevier.
Nobile, M. A., Fava, P., & Piergiovanni, L. (2002). Del water
transport properties of cellophane exible lms intended for food
packaging applications. Journal of Food Engineering, 53(4),
295300.
Nogueira, R. I., Park, K. J., & Deyrmendjian, E. (2001). Flow
properties of Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) extract. In J. WeltiChanes, G. V. Barbosa-Canovas, & J. M. Aguilera (Eds.),
Proceedings of the eight international congress on engineering and
food (pp. 425429). Pennsylvania, PA: Technomic Publishing, Co.
Inc.
Nunez-Santiago, C., Santoyo, E., Bello-Perez, L. A., & SantoyoGutierrez, S. (2003). Rheological evaluation of non-Newtonian
Mexican nixtamalised maize and dry processed masa ours.
Journal of Food Engineering, 60(1), 5566.
ODonnell, H. J., & Butler, F. (2002). Time-dependent viscosity of
stirred yogurt. Part II: tube ow. Journal of Food Engineering,
51(3), 255261.
Ojeda, C., Haros, C. M., Tolaba, M., & Calceta-Resio, A. (2001).
Thermal properties of corn our by DSC eect of heating rate
water to our ratio and particle size. In J. Welti-Chanes, G. V.
Barbosa-Canovas, & J. M. Aguilera (Eds.), Proceedings of the eight
international congress on engineering and food (pp. 197201).
Pennsylvania, PA: Technomic Publishing Co., Inc.
Pan, Z., Singh, R. P., & Rumsey, T. R. (2000). Predictive modeling of
contact-heating process for cooking a hamburger patty. Journal of
Food Engineering, 46, 919.
Patankar, S. V., & Spalding, D. B. (1972). A calculation procedure for
heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic
127
128