Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Cole v. Weadock, 89 F.3d 823, 1st Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary that: 1) Affirms the district court's denial of Dr. Richard Cole's appeal essentially for the reasons provided in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 2) Finds no error of law or abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of Dr. Cole's subsequent motion filed under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3) Rules that the district court's decision is affirmed in accordance with the First Circuit's local rules.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-07-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 89 F.3d 823 Docket: 96-1057

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary that: 1) Affirms the district court's denial of Dr. Richard Cole's appeal essentially for the reasons provided in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 2) Finds no error of law or abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of Dr. Cole's subsequent motion filed under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3) Rules that the district court's decision is affirmed in accordance with the First Circuit's local rules.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views1 page

    Cole v. Weadock, 89 F.3d 823, 1st Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary that: 1) Affirms the district court's denial of Dr. Richard Cole's appeal essentially for the reasons provided in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 2) Finds no error of law or abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of Dr. Cole's subsequent motion filed under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3) Rules that the district court's decision is affirmed in accordance with the First Circuit's local rules.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    89 F.

    3d 823

    NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished


    opinions may be cited only in related cases.
    Richard A. COLE, M.D., Petitioner,
    v.
    Thomas J. WEADOCK, Jr., Chief Probation Officer, U.S.
    District of Massachusetts, Respondent.
    No. 96-1057.

    United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.


    July 9, 1996.

    Richard A. Cole, M.D. F.A.C.P. on brief pro se.


    Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Jeffry Fowley, Special
    Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for respondent.
    Before SELYA, BOUDIN and STAHL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    We have considered the parties' briefs and the record on appeal. We affirm
    essentially for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's report and
    recommendation, dated November 14, 1995, which was accepted and adopted
    by the district court in an order, dated November 30, 1995. In addition, we find
    neither error of law nor abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of
    appellant's subsequent motion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b).

    Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27.1.

    You might also like