Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Amsden v. Senate Committee, 54 F.3d 764, 1st Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Henry H. Amsden and H.H. Amsden & Sons filed a complaint against the Senate Committee on the Judiciary and other defendants. The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denied a subsequent motion to vacate the dismissal on the additional ground of mootness. The First Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no error in the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction or the denial of the motion to vacate.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-05-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 54 F.3d 764 Docket: 94-2108

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Henry H. Amsden and H.H. Amsden & Sons filed a complaint against the Senate Committee on the Judiciary and other defendants. The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denied a subsequent motion to vacate the dismissal on the additional ground of mootness. The First Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no error in the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction or the denial of the motion to vacate.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Amsden v. Senate Committee, 54 F.3d 764, 1st Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Henry H. Amsden and H.H. Amsden & Sons filed a complaint against the Senate Committee on the Judiciary and other defendants. The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denied a subsequent motion to vacate the dismissal on the additional ground of mootness. The First Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no error in the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction or the denial of the motion to vacate.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    54 F.

    3d 764
    NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be
    cited only in related cases.

    Henry H. AMSDEN, H.H. Amsden & Sons, Plaintiffs,


    Appellants,
    v.
    SENATE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, et al.,
    Defendants, Appellees.
    No. 94-2108.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    First Circuit.
    May 15, 1995.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New
    Hampshire [Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge]
    Henry H. Amsden, on brief pro se.
    Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney, and T. David Plourde, Assistant
    United States Attorney, on brief for appellees.
    D.N.H.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, SELYA and BOUDIN, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal. There was no
    error in the district court's dismissal of the complaint for lack of subject matter
    jurisdiction nor its denial of the subsequent motion to vacate on the additional
    ground of mootness.
    Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27.1.

    You might also like