USCA1 Opinion

July 29, 1996

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________

No. 95-2369

LIONEL A. LALIBERTE,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent, Appellee.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Edward F. Harrington, U.S. District Judge]

___________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Cyr and Boudin,

Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

Lionel Laliberte on brief pro se.

________________
Donald K. Stern,
________________

United States Attorney, and

Shelbey D. Wrig
_______________

Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam.
__________

the denial

Petitioner Lionel

of his second

Laliberte appeals

motion under 28

vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence.

U.S.C.

from

2255 to

To the extent he

is contending that his

of

double

conviction and sentence are violative

jeopardy

because

forfeiture, his claim

v. Ursery, ___
______

To the extent

were

characterized

1990).

orders

of

of United States
_____________

WL 340815 (June 24,

as

been rejected

v. Parcels of Land,
________________

Nor was any

"proceeds" of

for purposes of 21

has already

United States
______________

earlier

1996).

he is contending that his forfeited properties

improperly

claim

the

falters on the basis

S. Ct. ___, 1996

trafficking activity

his

of

by

903

such claim raised

the judgment is summarily affirmed.

________

U.S.C.

his

881(a)(6),

this court.

F.2d 36

below.

drug

See
___

(1st Cir.

Accordingly,

See Loc. R. 27.1.

___

-2-