You are on page 1of 6

USCA1 Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]


[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________

No. 96-1589

MARIA FELINSKA,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

NEW ENGLAND TEAMSTERS AND TRUCKING

INDUSTRY PENSION FUND,

Defendant, Appellee.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Nancy Gertner, U.S. District Judge]


___________________

____________________

Before

Cyr, Boudin and Lynch,

Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

Matthew Cobb for appellant.


____________

Anne McCully Murphy with whom Charles P. O'Connor, Morgan, Le


____________________
____________________ __________

& Bockius, LLP,


________________

Christopher N. Souris
_______________________

and

Feinberg, Charnas
__________________

Birmingham, P.C. are on brief for appellee.


________________

____________________

November 6, 1996
____________________

Per Curiam.

Maria

Felinska appeals from

the district

__________

court's summary judgment dismissing her claim that her former

employer

had

discharging

discriminated

her because of her

Discrimination in

The district

prima facie

fact

as

Greenberg
_________

(1st Cir. 1995).

record,

did

not

constructively

U.S.C.

of the Age

621

Felinska had not

case because, even accepting

they

by

age in violation

Employment Act, 29

court ruled that

true,

discharge.

against her

et. seq.
________

presented a

her allegations of

demonstrate

v. Union Camp Corp., 48


_________________

constructive

F.3d 22,

26

After reviewing the parties' briefs and the

we affirm substantially for the reasons given by the

district court.

Affirmed.
________

-2-

-2-

You might also like