This document is a summary of a US Court of Appeals case. It denies the appeal of Jean-Baptiste Calixce who was convicted in district court and claimed his Fourth Amendment rights were violated. The Court of Appeals grants the government's motion for summary affirmance, agreeing with the district court's order that denied Calixce's pre-trial motion to suppress evidence.
This document is a summary of a US Court of Appeals case. It denies the appeal of Jean-Baptiste Calixce who was convicted in district court and claimed his Fourth Amendment rights were violated. The Court of Appeals grants the government's motion for summary affirmance, agreeing with the district court's order that denied Calixce's pre-trial motion to suppress evidence.
This document is a summary of a US Court of Appeals case. It denies the appeal of Jean-Baptiste Calixce who was convicted in district court and claimed his Fourth Amendment rights were violated. The Court of Appeals grants the government's motion for summary affirmance, agreeing with the district court's order that denied Calixce's pre-trial motion to suppress evidence.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 98-1708
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
JEAN-BAPTISTE CALIXCE,
Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge]
[Hon. James R. Muirhead, U.S. Magistrate Judge]
Before
Lynch, Circuit Judge,
Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lipez, Circuit Judge.
Scott A. Lutes on brief for appellant.
Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney, and Jennifer E. Cole, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on Government's Motion for Summary Disposition.
April 2, 1999
Per Curiam.
Jean Bapti
conviction on the ground that the district court erred in
denying his pre-trial motion to suppress evidence allegedly obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. government has moved for summary affirmance.
The
We grant the
government's motion substantially for the reasons stated by the
district court in its Order dated February 10, 1998.
North American Loan & Thrift Company No. 2 (Now Known As North American Finance Corporation of Fulton County) v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 319 F.2d 132, 4th Cir. (1963)