The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Edgar Sepulveda's motion to set aside an earlier final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). The appeals court carefully reviewed the decision and found no prejudicial error or abuse of discretion. The district court judge was Shane Devine and the panel of circuit judges were Lynch, Bownes, and Lipez.
The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Edgar Sepulveda's motion to set aside an earlier final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). The appeals court carefully reviewed the decision and found no prejudicial error or abuse of discretion. The district court judge was Shane Devine and the panel of circuit judges were Lynch, Bownes, and Lipez.
The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Edgar Sepulveda's motion to set aside an earlier final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). The appeals court carefully reviewed the decision and found no prejudicial error or abuse of discretion. The district court judge was Shane Devine and the panel of circuit judges were Lynch, Bownes, and Lipez.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 98-2065
EDGAR SEPULVEDA,
Petitioner, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Respondent, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Shane Devine, Senior District Judge]
Before
Lynch, Circuit Judge,
Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lipez, Circuit Judge.
Edgar Sepulveda on brief pro se.
Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney, and Peter E. Papps, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on Motion for Summary Disposition for appellee.
June 16, 1999
Per Curiam.
Having carefully reviewed the decision
below in light of the briefs and the record on appeal, we find
no prejudicial error nor abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of appellant's motion to set aside an earlier final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). Affirmed.