Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Picaz, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Rigoberto Munoz Picaz's Rule 60(b) motion. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The district court's decision in United States v. Picaz was therefore affirmed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-10-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6725

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Rigoberto Munoz Picaz's Rule 60(b) motion. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The district court's decision in United States v. Picaz was therefore affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Picaz, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Rigoberto Munoz Picaz's Rule 60(b) motion. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The district court's decision in United States v. Picaz was therefore affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6725

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RIGOBERTO MUNOZ PICAZ,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
    District Judge. (5:03-cr-00201)

    Submitted:

    October 18, 2007

    Decided:

    October 24, 2007

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Rigoberto Munoz Picaz, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Rigoberto Munoz Picaz appeals the district courts order
    denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.


    No. 5:03-cr-00201 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 2007).

    United States v. Picaz,


    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like