Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Funk v. Vanyur, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Robert Funk appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court denied Funk's motion for appointment of counsel and did not hold oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in existing court documents.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-08-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6605

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Funk appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court denied Funk's motion for appointment of counsel and did not hold oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in existing court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Funk v. Vanyur, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Funk appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court denied Funk's motion for appointment of counsel and did not hold oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in existing court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6605

    ROBERT V. FUNK,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    J. M. VANYUR, Warden; JAMES GILMORE, Attorney
    General of the Commonwealth of Virginia,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge.
    (CA-97-24-5-BR)
    Submitted:

    August 14, 1997

    Decided:

    August 25, 1997

    Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Robert V. Funk, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Funk
    v. Vanyur, No. CA-97-24-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 4, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like