Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Benjamin v. Townsend, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Alejandro David Benjamin against Jerry R. Townsend. The district court denied Benjamin relief and the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-08-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6455

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Alejandro David Benjamin against Jerry R. Townsend. The district court denied Benjamin relief and the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Benjamin v. Townsend, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Alejandro David Benjamin against Jerry R. Townsend. The district court denied Benjamin relief and the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6455

    ALEJANDRO DAVID BENJAMIN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JERRY R. TOWNSEND,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
    (CA-96-45-2)
    Submitted:

    July 25, 1996

    Decided:

    August 14, 1996

    Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Alejandro David Benjamin, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Benjamin v. Townsend, No. CA-96-45-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 25, Mar.
    21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like