Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Frizzelle v. Greenbacker, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Jonathan Randall Frizzelle's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's reasoning that Frizzelle was not entitled to relief based on the facts and legal arguments presented in the case. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the case adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-07-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6066

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Jonathan Randall Frizzelle's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's reasoning that Frizzelle was not entitled to relief based on the facts and legal arguments presented in the case. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the case adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Frizzelle v. Greenbacker, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Jonathan Randall Frizzelle's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's reasoning that Frizzelle was not entitled to relief based on the facts and legal arguments presented in the case. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the case adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6066

    JONATHAN RANDALL FRIZZELLE,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN E. GREENBACKER, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CA-95-1334-R)
    Submitted:

    June 20, 1996

    Decided:

    July 1, 1996

    Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jonathan Randall Frizzelle, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Frizzelle v. Greenbacker, No. CA-95-1334-R (W.D. Va. Dec.
    19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like