Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Williams v. Deloch, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Nathaniel Williams filed a § 1983 complaint against prison doctors and officials which was denied by the district court. Williams appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's reasoning for denying relief. As such, the appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Williams' § 1983 complaint without oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-02-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7432

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Nathaniel Williams filed a § 1983 complaint against prison doctors and officials which was denied by the district court. Williams appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's reasoning for denying relief. As such, the appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Williams' § 1983 complaint without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Williams v. Deloch, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Nathaniel Williams filed a § 1983 complaint against prison doctors and officials which was denied by the district court. Williams appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's reasoning for denying relief. As such, the appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Williams' § 1983 complaint without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7432

    NATHANIEL WILLIAMS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DOCTOR DELOCH; DOCTOR WEAVER; FRANKLIN E.
    FREEMAN, JR.; JAMES B. HUNT, JR., Governor,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-95-432-5-F)
    Submitted:

    January 18, 1996

    Decided:

    February 5, 1996

    Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Nathaniel Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Williams v. Deloch, No. CA-95-432-5-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 15,
    1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like