Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Jackson, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Terrell Deon Jackson's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's September 19, 1995 opinion denying Jackson's § 2255 motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-02-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7811

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Terrell Deon Jackson's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's September 19, 1995 opinion denying Jackson's § 2255 motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Jackson, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Terrell Deon Jackson's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's September 19, 1995 opinion denying Jackson's § 2255 motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7811

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    TERRELL DEON JACKSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CR-93-262-A, CA-95-1108-AM)
    Submitted:

    February 7, 1996

    Decided:

    February 28, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Terrell Deon Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
    28 U.S.C. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
    Jackson, Nos. CR-93-262-A; CA-95-1108-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 19, 1995).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like