Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Jones, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Dwight Jones appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit did not publish its opinion because unpublished opinions are not binding precedent. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7659

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Dwight Jones appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit did not publish its opinion because unpublished opinions are not binding precedent. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Jones, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Dwight Jones appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit did not publish its opinion because unpublished opinions are not binding precedent. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7659

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DWIGHT JONES, a/k/a Shakey,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-92-162-R, CA-95-801)
    Submitted:

    January 11, 1996

    Decided:

    January 25, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Dwight Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
    N. George Metcalf, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
    28 U.S.C. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
    Jones, Nos. CR-92-162-R; CA-95-801 (E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 1995). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like