Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bryant v. US Dept of Justice, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Richard Bryant filed a Bivens complaint against the Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons, which the district court denied. Bryant appealed the district court's denial. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-07-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6165

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Richard Bryant filed a Bivens complaint against the Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons, which the district court denied. Bryant appealed the district court's denial. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Bryant v. US Dept of Justice, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Richard Bryant filed a Bivens complaint against the Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons, which the district court denied. Bryant appealed the district court's denial. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6165

    RICHARD A. BRYANT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; BUREAU OF
    PRISONS; KATHLEEN HAWK, Director,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-95-1049-5-H)
    Submitted:

    July 23, 1996

    Decided:

    July 30, 1996

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Richard A. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his Bivens complaint. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bryant v. United
    States Dep't of Justice, No. CA-95-1049-5-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 10,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like