Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hawkins v. Mahon, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by Melvin Lee Hawkins of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against D.T. Mahon, Warden, and Lieutenant Baker. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion that denied Hawkins' complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6401

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by Melvin Lee Hawkins of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against D.T. Mahon, Warden, and Lieutenant Baker. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion that denied Hawkins' complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Hawkins v. Mahon, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal filed by Melvin Lee Hawkins of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against D.T. Mahon, Warden, and Lieutenant Baker. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion that denied Hawkins' complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6401

    MELVIN LEE HAWKINS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    D. T. MAHON, Warden; LIEUTENANT BAKER,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.
    (CA-94-759)
    Submitted:

    May 16, 1996

    Decided:

    June 6, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Melvin Lee Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Theresa Bowers, OFFICE
    OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Hawkins v. Mahon, No. CA-94-759 (W.D. Va. Feb. 20, 1996). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like