Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Cook v. Harless, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Quinton Lee Cook filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Mr. Harless, Mr. Wingler, and Mr. Holloway that was dismissed as frivolous by the district court. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6413

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Quinton Lee Cook filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Mr. Harless, Mr. Wingler, and Mr. Holloway that was dismissed as frivolous by the district court. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Cook v. Harless, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Quinton Lee Cook filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Mr. Harless, Mr. Wingler, and Mr. Holloway that was dismissed as frivolous by the district court. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6413

    QUINTON LEE COOK,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MR. HARLESS; MR. WINGLER; MR. HOLLOWAY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,
    District Judge. (CA-96-7-5-MU)
    Submitted:

    June 20, 1996

    Decided:

    June 25, 1996

    Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Quinton Lee Cook, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing
    as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Cook v. Harless, No. CA-96-7-5-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 1,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like