Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Gary v. Clifton, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Willie Lee Gary, Jr. under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied relief to Gary and he appealed. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court relied on the reasoning of the district court, which found Gary's § 1983 complaint lacked merit. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6067

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Willie Lee Gary, Jr. under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied relief to Gary and he appealed. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court relied on the reasoning of the district court, which found Gary's § 1983 complaint lacked merit. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Gary v. Clifton, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Willie Lee Gary, Jr. under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied relief to Gary and he appealed. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court relied on the reasoning of the district court, which found Gary's § 1983 complaint lacked merit. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6067

    WILLIE LEE GARY, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    KATE CLIFTON; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
    CORRECTIONS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
    Judge. (CA-95-1017-5-BO)
    Submitted:

    May 16, 1996

    Decided:

    June 3, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Willie Lee Gary, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Gary v. Clifton, No. CA-95-1017-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 5,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like