Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Thomas, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of John Thomas Jr.'s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. In a per curiam unpublished opinion, the appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The district court's denial of Thomas's motion was therefore affirmed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-05-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6032

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of John Thomas Jr.'s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. In a per curiam unpublished opinion, the appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The district court's denial of Thomas's motion was therefore affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Thomas, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of John Thomas Jr.'s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. In a per curiam unpublished opinion, the appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The district court's denial of Thomas's motion was therefore affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6032

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JOHN THOMAS, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District
    Judge. (CR-93-171, CA-95-377-R)
    Submitted:

    April 15, 1996

    Decided:

    May 2, 1996

    Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    John Thomas, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge Mott,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
    28 U.S.C. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
    Thomas, Nos. CR-93-171; CA-95-377-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 2, 1996). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like