Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Nance, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jimmy Lawrence Nance's motion to recuse the district court judge in a case from 1992. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the recusal motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The district court's ruling was affirmed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-05-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6133

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jimmy Lawrence Nance's motion to recuse the district court judge in a case from 1992. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the recusal motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The district court's ruling was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Nance, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jimmy Lawrence Nance's motion to recuse the district court judge in a case from 1992. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the recusal motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The district court's ruling was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6133

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CR-92-135-R)
    Submitted:

    April 16, 1998

    Decided:

    May 4, 1998

    Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jimmy Lawrence Nance, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appellant's motion to recuse. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
    Nance, No. CR-92-135-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 16, 1998). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like