Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anderson v. Peeler, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Michael Anthony Anderson filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several medical professionals. The district court denied relief to Anderson and he appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court also denied Anderson's motion for discovery.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-03-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7736

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Michael Anthony Anderson filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several medical professionals. The district court denied relief to Anderson and he appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court also denied Anderson's motion for discovery.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Anderson v. Peeler, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Michael Anthony Anderson filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several medical professionals. The district court denied relief to Anderson and he appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court also denied Anderson's motion for discovery.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7736

    MICHAEL ANTHONY ANDERSON,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DOCTOR PEELER; NURSE SCOTT; S. MURPHY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CA-95-1164-R)
    Submitted:

    February 7, 1996

    Decided:

    March 8, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Michael Anthony Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for discovery and
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Anderson v. Peeler,
    No. CA-95-1164-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like