Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Wilson, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    George Wilson appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the Fourth Circuit denied Wilson a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, dispensing with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-01-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7469

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    George Wilson appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the Fourth Circuit denied Wilson a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, dispensing with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Wilson, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    George Wilson appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the Fourth Circuit denied Wilson a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, dispensing with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7469

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    GEORGE WILSON, a/k/a Fat George,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
    (CR-95-198, CA-98-2-6)

    Submitted:

    December 29, 1998

    Decided:

    January 12, 1999

    Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    George Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    George Wilson seeks to appeal the district courts order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West
    1994 & Supp. 1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. Wilson, Nos.

    CR-95-198; CA-98-2-6 (E.D. Va. Sept. 10, 1998).

    We dispense with

    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like