Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Ham, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    1) Soloman Ham appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. 3) The Fourth Circuit therefore denied Ham a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the motion to vacate.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-10-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6228

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Soloman Ham appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. 3) The Fourth Circuit therefore denied Ham a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the motion to vacate.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Ham, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Soloman Ham appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. 3) The Fourth Circuit therefore denied Ham a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the motion to vacate.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6228

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    SOLOMAN HAM, a/k/a Soloman Hamm, a/k/a Charles
    Brewer,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
    (CR-90-53-N)

    Submitted:

    October 8, 1998

    Decided:

    October 23, 1998

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Soloman Ham, Appellant Pro Se. Arenda L. Wright Allen, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Soloman Ham seeks to appeal the district courts order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Ham, No. CR-90-53-N (E.D. Va. Jan. 12,
    1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like