The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the decision of the District Court of Maine in a case brought by Elsie Morley against the Maine Department of Human Services. The appeals court reviewed the documents filed on appeal and the record below and affirmed the lower court's decision for the reasons stated in the district court ruling. The appeals court decision was per curiam and not for publication.
The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the decision of the District Court of Maine in a case brought by Elsie Morley against the Maine Department of Human Services. The appeals court reviewed the documents filed on appeal and the record below and affirmed the lower court's decision for the reasons stated in the district court ruling. The appeals court decision was per curiam and not for publication.
The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the decision of the District Court of Maine in a case brought by Elsie Morley against the Maine Department of Human Services. The appeals court reviewed the documents filed on appeal and the record below and affirmed the lower court's decision for the reasons stated in the district court ruling. The appeals court decision was per curiam and not for publication.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 99-1101
ELSIE L. MORLEY, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. Morton A. Brody, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Boudin and Lynch,
Circuit Judges.
Elsie L. Morley on brief pro se.
Andrew Ketterer, Attorney General, Paul Stern, Deputy Attorney General, Andrew S. Hagler, Assistant Attorney General, and Christopher C. Taub, Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.
September 23, 1999
Per Curiam.
After carefully reviewing the documents
filed on appeal and the record below we affirm substantially
for the reasons stated by the district court. Affirmed.
Stanley v. Tucker v. William R. Moller, Edmund T. Curran, Regnier, Moller & Taylor, A Partnership, John Does, A, B, C, and D, 445 F.2d 1400, 2d Cir. (1971)