Integrated Essay

Paragraph One (Introduction):

The reading and the lecture are both about DTT, which is human
manufactured chemical.
The author of the reading believes that DTT is much more harm than
good for the humans. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the
article. He thinks that is not bad as some people believe and it has many
benefits.

Paragraph Two (Body)

First of all, the author claims that DTT is a hazard to the environment. He
believes that it can poison and kill the wildlife. This point is challenged by
the lecturer. She says that DDT has a positive influence of the plants and
animals, because it kills insects which cause disease.

Paragraph Three (Body)

Secondly, the author states that ______________.

He argues ______________.
This argument is rebutted by the lecturer
She suggests _____________________.
She elaborates on this by mentioning that _______________.

Paragraph Four (Body)

Finally, the author mentions that _____________.
He is of the opinion that _____________
The lecturer, on the other hand, feels that _____________.
She puts forth the idea that _______________________.

Paragraph Five (Conclusion)

In conclusion, the lecture and the reading are both about ______________.
The professor effectively challenges the claims made in the article.