Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mentoring Your Student Teacher Edweb Final Report: Problem or Need
Mentoring Your Student Teacher Edweb Final Report: Problem or Need
Problem or Need
In the past, the quality of mentoring by cooperating teachers has been inconsistent.
Many of the master teachers have been wonderful mentors while others have been
inadequate and problems have arisen with the student teacher or the cooperating
teacher. The School of Education would like to ensure more consistency in the
student teacher experience. The “Mentoring Your Student Teacher” module will
provide additional support and guidance for mentors. This module will be referred
to as the “EdWeb” for the remainder of this report.
Providing the EdWeb training on-line benefits the cooperating teachers and
eliminates the need for them to attend face-to-face meetings. Face to face
meetings would require substantial travel for some of the cooperating teachers. The
travel distance and time required to travel to Boulder may be prohibitive for some
cooperating teachers to attend the training. In addition to the distance, the many
schedules of cooperating teacher would make it difficult to find mutually agreeable
times for meetings. The on-line web format would allow for a greater number of
cooperating teachers to participate because they will be able to select participation
time that work for their schedule.
The goal for the EdWeb is to improve the effectiveness of the cooperating teacher
and improve the student teacher experience. Cooperating teachers who complete
With a better awareness and practice of mentor skills, the School of Education will
receive positive assessment from university supervisors, student teachers, and
cooperating teachers. The quality of the teacher work samples should improve and
the student teacher will complete the semester successfully. This improved
experience will create stronger relationships between the university, the schools,
and the cooperating teachers. The quality of and employability of our teacher
candidates should increase and with improved mentoring, more teacher candidates
The audience for this EdWeb will consist of cooperating teachers that have agreed
to support a student teacher over the semester. These cooperating teachers all
hold professional licenses and have taught for a minimum of three years. All of the
cooperating teachers will have bachelor’s degree and many will have completed a
master’s degree. Some of the cooperating teachers will have mentored a student
teacher before and others will be new. The knowledge of the cooperating teachers
will vary and should provide for rich discussions about mentoring.
This EdWeb module will be a web based training program. This will allow the
learners to participate from home, work, or in a community setting. Most of the
learner’s are probably new to an e-learning environment. Scaffolding of technology
skills will be used to support these learners. This will include the on-line
discussions, a wikis, blogs, social bookmarking, and if necessary, phone or email
contact.
This EdWeb module was designed for on-line learning because this would best meet
the needs of cooperating teachers. This module will save them time and allow
them access to resources and community members. The EdWeb website is
designed for easy and consistent navigation for the user. Design components
include the prototypes, typography, instructional images, and design elements of
contrast, alignment, repetition, and proximity.
Prototypes:
R 0 R 32 R 97 R 242 R 195
Navigation Scheme: The navigation for this project will consist of sparse
navigation. New activities and materials will be presented each week. The
Typography: The audience for this website are educators. I will make the
assumption that many of them use a Macintosh computer. I wanted to choose
fonts that were available on both a personal computer and a Macintosh. All the
main body headers will use the serif Georgia font. The main body text and
navigation links will use the san serif font Verdana. This font is available on both
platforms. Alternates will be listed in the cascading style sheeting.
Verdana Regular 18
Side Navigation – font color #C3C4C5 (off state), #20578E (over state),
#011730 (active state)
Verdana Regular 14
Body Header – font color dark blue #011730
Georgia Bold 18
Body Sub-Header – font color dark blue #011730
Georgia Regular 18
Body Leading Text – font color dark blue #011730
Georgia Regular 14
Body Text – font color dark blue #011730
Instructional Images:
a. Comic (Decorative)
b. Power point welcome (interpretive)
c. Chart of tools to be used in module (organizational): wikis, blogs,
del.icio.us, Skype, voice threads
d. Screen shots tour of learning module (representative)
2. Week 2: What is Mentoring?
a. Introduction to del.icio.us video (representative)
b. Power point of what is mentoring (interpretive)
c. Comic (decorative) of Teacher/student
d. Mentor beliefs inventory – take survey – see on-line visual of
how others answered (organizational)
3. Week 3: Need for mentors
a. Synchronized Skype Video (representative) Ask an Expert – a Q
& A session with an induction specialist –
b. Flash Learning Object (representative) Roles and
Responsibilities of Mentor (coach, friend, subject knowledge guidance,
assessor)
c. What makes a good mentor (illustrative audio clips of university
supervisors and student teachers sharing their experiences) – use
either voice threads, flash, or PowerPoint (representative)
4. Week 4: Working with Different Generations
a. Characteristics of each generation (interpretive) - PowerPoint
b. Flash learning object (interpretive) Implications of generations:
how to communicate with each other –
c. Visual of survey results from previous student teachers
(organizational) - understanding the needs of your student teacher–
5. Week 5: Developing Critical Mentor Communication Skills – (a-d)
video presentation
a. Trust/listening - video (representative)
b. Chart of Requirements of program (organizational) – solo
experience/TWS
c. Video scenarios (representative) - three situations – participants
will explore their responses to situation– identifying coaching skills –
6. Week 6: Teacher Work Sample – Part I (Intro to the TWS, Context,
Unit Rationale and Unit)
a. Video of faculty (professors, instructors, and university
supervisors) TWS part 1 (representative)
b. Sample components from previous student teachers
(organizational)
7. Week 7: Teacher Work Sample – Part II (Assessment, Pre-assessment,
Formative Assessment, Summative Post-assessment, Analysis of pre-
assessment)
1. Contrast:
a. Page elements have contrast to identify the
different areas. The header is a dark blue with contrasting gray text.
The navigation elements are a light blue with contrasting gray text.
Active links are dark blue. The main section is on a gray background
with dark blue text. Instructional Images are on a tan background
with dark blue elements.
b. Fonts provide contrast in size and type. Navigation
and text elements use a Verdana font and main (size 18) and sub-
headers (size 14) use a bolded Georgia font. Text elements are a size
12.
c. Instructional images provide contrast in type
(video, picture, cartoon, diagram), size and shape, and style
(interactive, motion
2. Alignment:
a. Left navigation elements are all left aligned with
the text of the main header and top navigation bar.
b. Text in the left navigation bar and the main body of
page are both aligned to each other.
c. Most graphic elements align with the left side of the
main body.
d. The elements in the top navigation bar are
distributed evenly among the elements horizontal centers. The left
and right text elements of the main header and the top navigation bar
are each aligned to each other.
e. The padding of elements within the blocks has
consistent left and right padding.
f. Graphic elements on home page images are
aligned with the vertical centers and centered within the box. The
elements are distributed evenly among the horizontal centers.
g. Video, still pictures, and Flash Learning Objects are
all left aligned with the body text.
3. Repetition:
Instructional Plan
This course will be a 9-week group paced web module with a new week opened
each week. The course will begin with an orientation to the on-line learning
environment and the tools that will be used in each module. Week 2 will allow
participants to explore “what is a mentor” by exploring their beliefs. Week 3 will
further explore the roles and importance of the mentor. Week 4 will examine
generations and how they can incorporate this knowledge in communicating with
their student teacher. Week 5 will continue to explore additional areas that will
enhance their communication skills and give participants an opportunity to practice
coaching skills. Weeks 6-8 will provide information about the Teacher Work Sample
from university faculty and allow cooperating teachers to review and explore
teacher work samples. The final week will provide information to assist the
cooperating teacher in providing information and strategies to successfully enter
the teaching profession.
The social values are important to integrate into this course. This will be done
through threaded discussions, reflective blogs, brainstorming, story telling,
question/answer sessions, and co-creation of ideas. These activities will allow the
participants to increase their network and find other cooperating teachers who are
also mentoring students.
Through reflective journals, blogging, brainstorming, story telling and questions and
answer sessions the active values will be incorporated. The use of case studies and
real “what if” scenarios” should allow them to actively reflect on how they would
handle the present situation.
Our department regularly communicates with our students, but has noticed
that they do not always “receive” the information that we send to them.
Through generations training we have come to understand that the way we
send the information may not be effective in communicating with the
millennial generation. The millennial generation comprises 80% of our
4. Learning activities:
Formative Evaluation
Resources and Constraints: The resources for the formative evaluation will be
limited to Jill Perry, Kanesha Baynard, and volunteer university supervisors and
cooperating teachers. This is a new module with implementation planned for fall
2009. This will allow for a trial run in spring 2009. Material for this module may be
adapted to meet the needs of the audience. The largest constraint for the formative
evaluation will be time and clear deadlines will be set for evaluators to provide
feedback. This project does not have monetary funding and will be created using
volunteer hours.
Questions to be answered:
Learning Effectiveness
1. Will the mentors take advantage of the community building tools?
2. Will the student teacher’s experience be improved through mentor training?
3. Will cooperating teachers see this module as beneficial or too time
consuming?
4. Is the content sequenced correctly?
5. Are there enough hands-on activities?
6. Do community activities have good participation?
Learner interest/motivation
1. Will mentors be interested in this content or will they be more motivated to
receive recertification credit?
2. Will the information in the module be able to be put to instant use?
3. Will the mentors participate and contribute to discussions?
4. Will the mentors research and add topics to Del.icio.us or wikis?
5. Will the mentors use blogging for reflection and share their reflections with
others?
6. How can negative participants be beneficial to the group?
7. Will all levels of mentors find this material interesting/challenging?
8. Will mentors recommend this training to others?
Content Quality
1. Does website have consistent design elements throughout site?
2. Does the content add value to the mentor experience?
3. Are instructions easy to follow and clearly understood?
4. Is there too much content in some areas?
5. Is the content free of errors?
Technical Quality
1. Do all of the media elements function on both Mac and PC platforms?
2. Does internet speed affect the user’s ability to participate?
3. Will the content work on older computers?
4. Do the media components add value to the module?
5. Are all audio components easily heard and understood on user’s computers?
Implementability
1. Will users be able to navigate through the weekly lessons?
2. Will mentors have the time needed to complete this module?
3. How large a group could be supported by Field Experiences?
Stages: The formative evaluation for this EdWeb will take place on a continual
basis following Martin Tessmer’s Layers of Formative Evaluation. These include the
stages of self-evaluation, expert review, one-to-one, small group, and a field test.
Field Test: In the spring 2009 semester, a small group will be used to field
test this module.
Data gathering tools and methods: Various tools will be used to collect
information and prepare reports. Tests will be performed throughout the
development to ensure the proper functioning of the website. Evaluators will keep
logs and field notes. During the one-to-one testing, observation of the user
experience will be recorded and discussed with the user. Data will be gathered
about the users to find out how much experience evaluators have using computers
and on-line training. Zoomerang questionnaires will be used to receive feedback
from cooperating teachers, university supervisors.