Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Model
Uppsala
Uppsala Model
Model
Group 16
Chhavi Bhandari
Divya Gupta
Freejo Jose
Pragjyoti Samal
Rajat Chandra
Shubham Agarwal
Agenda
• Context
• Psychic Distance
• Variables Governing International Business
• Learning Cycle
• Establishment Chain” of Market
Commitment
• Case: Johnson Electric
• Internet Up against Uppsala Model
• Merits of the Uppsala Model
• Deficiencies of the Uppsala Model
• Merits
• Deficiencies
Context
Level of market
Level of knowledge to
commitment in steer the
a particular host direction of the
country geographic
expansion
Commitment
Market knowledge Decision
Current
Market Commitment
Activities
“Establishment Chain” of Market Commitment Uppsala
Model
Irregular export
activities
Export via
independent sales
representative
Uppsala
Model
Production /
Manufacturing
Market Commitment
Sales subsidiary
Export via
Independent
Representatives
No Regular Export
Activities
Market Knowledge
1979 – China’s
modernization
Late 70s –
programme –
Became a
moved to low
Mid 70s – supplier to West
cost
Started German auto
manufacturing
producing mfgs
in Chine
1972 – motors for
Diversificatio business
n with machines
motors for
1949 –
Founded by
household
Wang Seng appliances
Liang in Hong
Kong to mfg.
micro motors
for toys
Internet Up against Uppsala Model Uppsala
Model
Pros of Uppsala Model Uppsala
Model
●
Export oriented firms
Influenti ●
Useful for companies and
al Theory government bodies.
●
● Assumed to be exports
Starting Point ●
● Internationalisation also includes importing, licensing, and foreign
direct investment.
Manufacturing ●
● Services sector neglected
●
Focus on individual firms excluding the effects of networks
based
●
No predictions ●
● Technology, firm size, strategic considerations, economies
of scale etc excluded.
Possible
When Firms Do not need to Follow Uppsala Model Uppsala
Model