You are on page 1of 14

Uppsala

Model

Uppsala
Uppsala Model
Model

Group 16
Chhavi Bhandari
Divya Gupta
Freejo Jose
Pragjyoti Samal
Rajat Chandra
Shubham Agarwal
Agenda

• Context
• Psychic Distance
• Variables Governing International Business
• Learning Cycle
• Establishment Chain” of Market
Commitment
• Case: Johnson Electric
• Internet Up against Uppsala Model
• Merits of the Uppsala Model
• Deficiencies of the Uppsala Model
• Merits
• Deficiencies
Context

Rank   Country   Companies  


1  United States 140
2  Japan 68
3  France 40
4  Germany 39
5  China 37
6  United Kingdom 26
7  Switzerland 15
8  Canada 14
8  South Korea 14
10  Netherlands 12
10  Spain 12
Psychic Distance Uppsala
Model

“Psychic Distance” – Measure of barriers to market knowledge.


It is defined in terms of factors like:
lang cult poli educati
legal onal
uage ure tical systems
Companies begin their operations in fairly nearby markets and
gradually penetrate to far-flung markets
Variables Governing International Business Uppsala
Model

Level of market
Level of knowledge to
commitment in steer the
a particular host direction of the
country geographic
expansion

Firm’s Own Commitment


decisions: Market
Operations:
uncertainty and
Experiential
perceived risks
knowledge is and
crucial. opportunities.
Learning Cycle Uppsala
Model

Commitment
Market knowledge Decision

Current
Market Commitment
Activities
“Establishment Chain” of Market Commitment Uppsala
Model

Irregular export
activities

Export via
independent sales
representative
Uppsala
Model

Production /
Manufacturing
Market Commitment

Sales subsidiary

Export via
Independent
Representatives

No Regular Export
Activities

Market Knowledge
1979 – China’s
modernization
Late 70s –
programme –
Became a
moved to low
Mid 70s – supplier to West
cost
Started German auto
manufacturing
producing mfgs
in Chine
1972 – motors for
Diversificatio business
n with machines
motors for
1949 –
Founded by
household
Wang Seng appliances
Liang in Hong
Kong to mfg.
micro motors
for toys
Internet Up against Uppsala Model Uppsala
Model
Pros of Uppsala Model Uppsala
Model


Export oriented firms
Influenti ●
Useful for companies and
al Theory government bodies.

Firms are often relatively small and


Sequenti do not belong to a multinational


company with access to sufficient
al Stages resources.
Pros of Uppsala Model Uppsala
Model
Cons of Uppsala Model Uppsala
Model
Deterministic ●
● Internationalisation process once started, cannot be
stopped.
Establishment Chain
Gradual nature of ●
● Firms may ‘leap frog’ ahead
internationalisation ●
● Firms may be ‘Born-Global’
Contested.

● Paths may be industry dependent


● Assumed to be exports
Starting Point ●
● Internationalisation also includes importing, licensing, and foreign
direct investment.

Manufacturing ●
● Services sector neglected

Focus on individual firms excluding the effects of networks
based

No predictions ●
● Technology, firm size, strategic considerations, economies
of scale etc excluded.
Possible
When Firms Do not need to Follow Uppsala Model Uppsala
Model

Firms with access to a Once a firm has gaine


Relevant market
large pool of resources experience from a
knowledge can be
are less susceptible to market with similar
acquired in ways other
the consequences of conditions, it may be
than through direct
(bad) commitments and possible to generalise
experience when market
able to step up their this experience and
conditions are stable and
internationalisation apply it to the new
homogeneous
effort at a faster rate target market.

You might also like