Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REPORT ON
IN
MR.MANJUNATH PRASAD
SUBMITTED BY:
GROUP NO 06(SEC ‘A’) VAATSALYA VASANTH (081202032)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We are greatly elated to present our report on “ “study of different learning styles used
by students””.
MR.MANJUNATH PRASAD
who has supported us all throughout the semester to make our study easier, whose encouragement
and guidance has made the presentation and report a success.
We also convey our earnest thanks to all the other people who have helped us both directly and
indirectly, in our diligent endeavour.
Vaatsalya Vasanth
Preethi N K
INTRODUCTION
Learning styles are simply different approaches or ways of learning. Everybody has a
preferred learning style. Knowing and understanding our learning style helps us to learn more
effectively. Through identifying the learning style, will be able to capitalize on strengths and
improve self-advocacy skills of an individual
1. Visual Learners
2. Auditory Learners
3. Kinesthetic Learners
Brief description of each learning style that an individual belongs to is explained below:
These learners need to see the teacher's body language and facial expression to fully
understand the content of a lesson. They tend to prefer sitting at the front of the classroom to
avoid visual obstructions (e.g. people's heads). They may think in pictures and learn
best from visual displays including: diagrams, illustrated text books, overhead transparencies,
videos, flipcharts and hand-outs. During a lecture or classroom discussion, visual learners
often prefer to take detailed notes to absorb the information.
They learn best through verbal lectures, discussions, talking things through and listening to
what others have to say. Auditory learners interpret the underlying meanings of speech
through listening to tone of voice, pitch, speed and other nuances. Written information may
have little meaning until it is heard. These learners often benefit from reading text aloud and
using a tape recorder.
.
Tactile/Kinaesthetic persons learn best through a hands-on approach, actively exploring the
physical world around them. They may find it hard to sit still for long periods and may
become distracted by their need for activity and exploration.
RESEARCH DESIGN
The problem selected for the research is to make in in-depth study in the area of different
learning styles pursued by Manipal university students. The research project is named as
“learning inventory management”
The survey was aimed to find out the number of students fall into which style of learning.
The problem was specified through discussion with students who filled in the questionnaire.
HYPOTHESIS TO BE TESTED:
To understand the pattern of learning by students, that how different learning styles
help different students. Students can study better once they know what their learning
style is.
This research details can be used by the lecturers for effective teaching.
Indirectly helping to increase the performance of the students.
Improving the reputation of the college.
Scope of Study:
TYPE OF RESEARCH
Quantitative research there are no fixed set of questions but, instead, a topic guide (or
discussion guide) is used to explore various issues in depth. In qualitative research the
discussion between the interviewer (or moderator) and the respondent is largely determined
by the respondent’s own thoughts and feelings. The interview tends to be longer than a
quantitative interview and fewer interviews are conducted.
The task of data collection can be carried either using primary data or secondary data. This
research uses only primary data.
For this research purpose the primary data was obtained by means of a common
structured question are that was given to employees.
Questionnaires are used for this purpose. The Questionnaire was carefully planned to
cover various aspects of the learning styles. In designing the questions, care was taken to
avoid bias.
CROSS TABULATION: To determine the relation between two variables. In this survey we
have cross tabulated with the Gender and the learning style of a student.
SAMPLE DESIGN
SAMPLE SIZE: The sample size is calculated with the help of using the below formula:
z2 σ 2
n=
e2
SAMPLING METHOD: Convenient sampling method has been followed to collect data
from target respondents.
ANALYSIS OF DATA
GENDER
Frequenc
y Percent
Vali female
25 41.7
d
male 35 58.3
Total 60 100.0
gender
female
male
Diagram 1.1
INTERPRETATION: The above chart depicts the distribution of the total sample that we had
undertaken in our study. In our study, we had taken 35 samples from the male population and
25 samples from the female population. Hence our sample size is 60 students.
STYLE
Frequency Percent
Vali auditory
13 21.7
d
kinestheti
19 31.7
c
visual 28 46.7
Total 60 100.0
style
auditory
kinesthetic
visual
Diagram 1.2
INTERPRETATION: The above chart depicts the distribution of the total sample that we had
undertaken in our study. In our study, we had taken 60 samples from the total manipal
students strength. The total students who have the following learning styles are
Auditory 13
Kinesthetic 19
Visual 28 Out of the 60 students population.
Count
style Total
kinestheti
auditory c Visual
gender female 5 12 8 25
male 8 7 20 35
Total 13 19 28 60
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp.
Sig. (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-
5.641(a) 2 .060
Square
Bar Chart
20
style
15 auditory
Count 10
kinesthetic
visual
5
0
female male
gender
Diagram 1.3
INTERPRETATION: As we observe from the bar chart that gender factor does not have
significance association with auditory and kinaesthetic learning style but it has association
with the visual learning style as per the graph. The hypothesis can accepted as per the chi
square test.
Gender has an association with the learning style of a student. As per the graph we conclude
that visual learners are more in males and kinesthetic learner’s are more in females.
Here domain means the branch that a student has opted during his class 11 and 12 any one of
the branch like science, commerce, and arts.
Count
Style
kinestheti
auditory c visual Total
domain Arts 4 0 1 5
commerc
2 10 7 19
e
science 7 9 20 36
Total 13 19 28 60
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp.
Sig. (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi- 15.513(a
4 .004
Square )
Diagram 1.4
INTERPRETATION: As we observe from the bar chart that domain factor does not have
significance influence for auditory and kinaesthetic learning style but it influences the visual
learning style as per the graph. Since the chi square test result value is 0.04, the hypothesis is
rejected as per the chi square test.
Count
Style
kinestheti
auditory c Visual Total
educatio undergraduat
5 5 9 19
n e
post graduate 8 14 19 41
Total 13 19 28 60
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp.
Sig. (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-
.532(a) 2 .767
Square
|
Bar Chart
20 style
auditory
15
kinesthetic
Count 10
visual
0
undergraduate post graduate
education
Diagram 1.5
INTERPRETATION: As we observe from the bar chart that education factor does not have
significance influence for auditory and kinaesthetic learning style but it does influence the
visual learning style as per the graph. The hypothesis can accepted as per the chi square test.
We conclude that, students who are in post graduation they have already perused a learning
style where as undergraduate students have not perused.
CONCLUSION
Research findings:
1. In the sample, the maximum students are visual learners when compared to auditory
and kinaesthetic learning.
2. The demographic feature has an association with the visual learning style, but it does
not influence the kinaesthetic and auditory learning of style.
3. The branch that a student takes in his class 11 and 12 does not influence his learning
style.
4. The education background also influences a students learning style.
The time span for the survey was short and as a result only the main aspects have
been considered.
QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear Sir/Madam,
This questionnaire has been prepared with a view to find out the
learning styles of students. The information will be strictly used for educational
purpose only by the students of Manipal Institute of Management (Manipal
University)
BIBLIOGRAPHY