You are on page 1of 28

Absolute Advantage

 Export those goods and services for


which a country is more productive
than other countries
 Import those goods and services for
which other countries are more
productive than it is

6-1 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Table 6.1 The Theory of Absolute
Advantage: An Example

OUTPUT PER HOUR OF LABOR


France Japan
Wine 2 1

Clock 3 5
radios

6-2 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Absolute Advantage’s Flaw

 What happens to trade if one country


has an absolute advantage in both
products?
 No trade would occur

6-3 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Comparative Advantage

 Produce and export those goods and


services for which it is relatively more
productive than other countries
 Import those goods and services for
which other countries are relatively
more productive than it is

6-4 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Differences between Comparative and
Absolute Advantage
 Absolute versus relative productivity
differences
 Comparative advantage incorporates
the concept of opportunity cost
– Value of what is given up to get the good

6-5 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Table 6.2 The Theory of Comparative
Advantage: An Example

OUTPUT PER HOUR OF LABOR


France Japan
Wine 4 1
9 4
Clock 6 5
radios 6 11

6-6 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Table 6.2 The Theory of Comparative
Advantage: An Example

OUTPUT PER HOUR OF LABOR


France Japan
Wine 5 4

Clock 6 5
radios

6-7 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Relative Factor Endowments

 What determines the products for


which a country will have a
comparative advantage?
– Factor endowments vary among countries
– Goods differ according to the types of
factors that are used to produce them

6-8 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Relative Factor Endowments_2

 A country will have a comparative


advantage in producing products that
intensively use resources (factors of
production) it has in abundance
– China: labor
– Saudi Arabia: oil
– Argentina: wheat
6-9 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Modern Firm-Based Trade Theories

 Country Similarity Theory


 Product Life Cycle Theory
 Global Strategic Rivalry Theory
 Porter’s National Competitive
Advantage

6-10 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Country Similarity Theory

 Explains the phenomenon of


intraindustry trade
– Trade between two countries of goods
produced by the same industry
• Japan exports Toyotas to Germany
• Germany exports BMWs to Japan

6-11 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Country Similarity Theory_2

 Trade results from similarities of


preferences among consumers in
countries that are at the same stage of
economic development
 Most trade in manufactured goods
should be between countries with
similar per capita incomes
6-12 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Product Life Cycle Theory

 Describes the evolution of marketing


strategies
 Stages
– New product
– Maturing product
– Standardized product

6-13 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Figure 6.4 The International Product Life
Cycle: Innovating Firm’s Country

6-14 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Figure 6.4 The International Product Life
Cycle: Other Industrialized Countries

6-15 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Figure 6.4 The International Product Life
Cycle: Less Developed Countries

6-16 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Global Strategic Rivalry Theory

 Firms struggle to develop sustainable


competitive advantage
 Advantage provides ability to dominate
global marketplace
 Focus: strategic decisions firms use to
compete internationally

6-17 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Sustaining Competitive Advantage

 Owning intellectual property rights


 Investing in research and development
 Achieving economies of scale or scope
 Exploiting the experience curve

6-18 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Porter’s National
Competitive Advantage
 Success in trade comes from the
interaction of four country and firm
specific elements
– Factor conditions
– Demand conditions
– Related and supporting industries
– Firm strategy, structure, and rivalry
6-19 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Figure 6.5 Porter’s Diamond of
National Competitive Advantage

Firm Strategy,
Structure,
and Rivalry
Factor Demand
Conditions Conditions
Related and
Supporting
Industries

6-20 ©2004 Prentice Hall


The intense
competitiveness
of Japanese
market forces
manufacturers to
continually
develop and fine-
tune new
products

6-21 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Figure 6.6 Theories of
International Trade
Country-Based Theories Firm-Based Theories
 Country is unit of analysis  Firm is unit of analysis
 Emerged prior to WWII  Emerged after WWII
 Developed by economists  Developed by business school
 Explain interindustry trade professors
 Include  Explain intraindustry trade
– Mercantilism  Include
– Absolute advantage – Country similarity theory
– Comparative advantage – Product life cycle
– Relative factor endowments – Global strategic rivalry
– National competitive
advantage

6-22 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Types of International Investments

 Does the investor seek an active


management role in the firm or merely
a return from a passive investment?
– Foreign Direct Investment
– Portfolio Investment

6-23 ©2004 Prentice Hall


International Investment Theories

 Ownership Advantages
 Internalization
 Dunning’s Eclectic Theory

6-24 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Ownership Advantages

 A firm owning a valuable asset that


creates a competitive advantage
domestically can use that advantage to
penetrate foreign markets through FDI
 Why FDI and not other methods?

6-25 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Internalization Theory

 FDI is more likely to occur when


transaction costs with a second firm are
high
 Transaction costs: costs associated
with negotiating, monitoring, and
enforcing a contract

6-26 ©2004 Prentice Hall


Dunning’s Eclectic Theory

 FDI reflects both international business


activity and business activity internal
to the firm
 3 conditions for FDI
– Ownership advantage
– Location advantage
– Internalization advantage
6-27 ©2004 Prentice Hall
Table 6.5 Factors Affecting
the FDI Decision
Supply Factors Demand Factors Political Factors

Production costs Customer access Avoidance of trade


barriers

Logistics Marketing advantages Economic


development
incentives
Resource availability Exploitation of
competitive advantages

Access to technology Customer mobility

6-28 ©2004 Prentice Hall

You might also like